Reintegration programmes for people with severe mental illnesses released from correctional institutions: systematic review.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Alexander I F Simpson, M Umer Waqar, Cory Gerritsen, Vito Adamo, Marco Kilada, Margaret Maheandiran, Reena Besa, Roland M Jones
{"title":"Reintegration programmes for people with severe mental illnesses released from correctional institutions: systematic review.","authors":"Alexander I F Simpson, M Umer Waqar, Cory Gerritsen, Vito Adamo, Marco Kilada, Margaret Maheandiran, Reena Besa, Roland M Jones","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2026.12034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with severe mental illness (SMI) face significant challenges when reintegrating from correctional facilities back to the community. These include increased recidivism risk, homelessness and mental health deterioration. Although specialised reintegration programmes were developed to address the needs of this vulnerable population, their effectiveness remains unclear owing to mixed findings reported in the literature.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We performed a systematic review to synthesise and evaluate available evidence on reintegration programmes designed specifically for people with SMI.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Studies were included if they focused on adults with SMI transitioning from correctional facilities to community settings. The search was conducted through 10 January 2026. Two reviewers independently screened eligible studies and scored the appropriate risk of bias tools under supervision. A narrative analysis was adopted given the heterogeneity of methodologies and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 26 eligible studies, of which 11 were longitudinal, seven were randomised controlled trials, 3 had an AB design, 2 quasi-experimental, 2 retrospective and 1 brief report. The median number of participants involved in these studies was 207 (range: 22-3086). Studies employed various interventions, including peer mentoring, critical time intervention models, case management and therapeutic community. Results showed mixed effectiveness: some programmes demonstrated reduced recidivism and improved mental health service engagement, whereas others had minimal impact or even counterintuitive increases in re-imprisonment. Programmes generally showed better outcomes with a longer duration and comprehensive aftercare components.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reintegration programmes show promise, but current approaches demonstrate variable efficacy. Successful interventions appear to require comprehensive, sustained support addressing multiple domains including mental health treatment, housing, employment and social support.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"12 4","pages":"e181"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13359055/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2026.12034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People with severe mental illness (SMI) face significant challenges when reintegrating from correctional facilities back to the community. These include increased recidivism risk, homelessness and mental health deterioration. Although specialised reintegration programmes were developed to address the needs of this vulnerable population, their effectiveness remains unclear owing to mixed findings reported in the literature.

Aims: We performed a systematic review to synthesise and evaluate available evidence on reintegration programmes designed specifically for people with SMI.

Method: Studies were included if they focused on adults with SMI transitioning from correctional facilities to community settings. The search was conducted through 10 January 2026. Two reviewers independently screened eligible studies and scored the appropriate risk of bias tools under supervision. A narrative analysis was adopted given the heterogeneity of methodologies and outcomes.

Results: We identified 26 eligible studies, of which 11 were longitudinal, seven were randomised controlled trials, 3 had an AB design, 2 quasi-experimental, 2 retrospective and 1 brief report. The median number of participants involved in these studies was 207 (range: 22-3086). Studies employed various interventions, including peer mentoring, critical time intervention models, case management and therapeutic community. Results showed mixed effectiveness: some programmes demonstrated reduced recidivism and improved mental health service engagement, whereas others had minimal impact or even counterintuitive increases in re-imprisonment. Programmes generally showed better outcomes with a longer duration and comprehensive aftercare components.

Conclusions: Reintegration programmes show promise, but current approaches demonstrate variable efficacy. Successful interventions appear to require comprehensive, sustained support addressing multiple domains including mental health treatment, housing, employment and social support.

从惩教机构释放的严重精神疾病患者重返社会方案:系统审查。
背景:重度精神疾病(SMI)患者在从惩教设施重新融入社会时面临着重大挑战。其中包括累犯风险增加、无家可归和精神健康恶化。虽然制定了专门的重返社会方案,以解决这一弱势群体的需要,但由于文献中报告的结果不一,其有效性仍不清楚。目的:我们进行了一项系统综述,以综合和评估专门为重度精神障碍患者设计的重返社会方案的现有证据。方法:如果研究集中于从教养设施过渡到社区环境的重度精神障碍成人,则纳入研究。搜寻工作一直进行到2026年1月10日。两名审稿人独立筛选符合条件的研究,并在监督下对适当的偏倚风险工具进行评分。考虑到方法和结果的异质性,采用了叙述分析。结果:我们确定了26项符合条件的研究,其中11项为纵向研究,7项为随机对照试验,3项为AB设计,2项为准实验,2项为回顾性研究,1项为简短报告。参与这些研究的参与者中位数为207人(范围:22-3086)。研究采用了多种干预措施,包括同伴指导、关键时间干预模型、病例管理和治疗社区。结果显示出好坏参半的效果:一些方案表明减少了再犯,提高了精神卫生服务的参与度,而另一些方案影响甚微,甚至违反直觉地增加了再监禁。方案一般表现出较长的持续时间和全面的善后部分较好的结果。结论:重返社会方案显示出希望,但目前的方法显示出不同的效果。成功的干预措施似乎需要全面、持续的支持,涉及心理健康治疗、住房、就业和社会支持等多个领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书