{"title":"MRI-based 3D cartilage modelling in the elbow joint : a validation study with potential for biomechanical modelling.","authors":"Tasuku Miyake, Satoshi Miyamura, Ryoya Shiode, Toru Iwahashi, Arisa Kazui, Natsuki Yamamoto, Hiroki Kondo, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Seiji Okada, Tsuyoshi Murase, Kunihiro Oka","doi":"10.1302/2046-3758.157.BJR-2025-0545.R2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To construct and validate a 3D MRI-based cartilage model of the elbow joint by comparing it with laser-scanned models and to assess how cartilage morphology influences intra-articular stress distribution through finite element analysis (FEA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven formalin-fixed cadaveric elbows were scanned using high-resolution MRI (voxel size: 0.375 × 0.375 × 0.400 mm), with sequences selected based on the contrast-to-noise ratio. Cartilage models of the distal humerus, radial head, and proximal ulna were reconstructed and validated against laser-scanned reference models. Validation metrics included cartilage thickness differences, surface-to-surface distances, and Dice similarity coefficients. Subsequently, FEA was performed using models with and without cartilage, under physiological loading, to evaluate the intra-articular stress distribution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MRI-based and laser-scanned models showed similar cartilage thickness distributions, with differences within or close to the imaging resolution. The median cartilage thicknesses measured using the MRI-based and laser-scanned models were 1.15 mm (IQR 0.97 to 1.54) and 1.25 mm (IQR 1.14 to 1.29) in the distal humerus, 1.15 mm (IQR 0.97 to 1.18) and 1.03 mm (IQR 1.01 to 1.14) in the radial head, and 1.06 mm (IQR 0.93 to 1.21) and 1.05 mm (IQR 1.00 to 1.10) in the proximal ulna, respectively. The surface-to-surface root mean square distances were < 0.40 mm, and the Dice coefficients exceeded 0.96. FEA revealed physiologically plausible stress concentration patterns at anatomical contact areas only in models incorporating the cartilage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 3D MRI-based cartilage models have high geometrical accuracy and biomechanical validity. These models offer a noninvasive tool for assessing cartilage morphology and joint mechanics, and may provide a foundation for future studies investigating the pathophysiology of elbow osteoarthritis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9074,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Research","volume":"15 7","pages":"811-821"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13341216/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.157.BJR-2025-0545.R2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: To construct and validate a 3D MRI-based cartilage model of the elbow joint by comparing it with laser-scanned models and to assess how cartilage morphology influences intra-articular stress distribution through finite element analysis (FEA).
Methods: Seven formalin-fixed cadaveric elbows were scanned using high-resolution MRI (voxel size: 0.375 × 0.375 × 0.400 mm), with sequences selected based on the contrast-to-noise ratio. Cartilage models of the distal humerus, radial head, and proximal ulna were reconstructed and validated against laser-scanned reference models. Validation metrics included cartilage thickness differences, surface-to-surface distances, and Dice similarity coefficients. Subsequently, FEA was performed using models with and without cartilage, under physiological loading, to evaluate the intra-articular stress distribution.
Results: MRI-based and laser-scanned models showed similar cartilage thickness distributions, with differences within or close to the imaging resolution. The median cartilage thicknesses measured using the MRI-based and laser-scanned models were 1.15 mm (IQR 0.97 to 1.54) and 1.25 mm (IQR 1.14 to 1.29) in the distal humerus, 1.15 mm (IQR 0.97 to 1.18) and 1.03 mm (IQR 1.01 to 1.14) in the radial head, and 1.06 mm (IQR 0.93 to 1.21) and 1.05 mm (IQR 1.00 to 1.10) in the proximal ulna, respectively. The surface-to-surface root mean square distances were < 0.40 mm, and the Dice coefficients exceeded 0.96. FEA revealed physiologically plausible stress concentration patterns at anatomical contact areas only in models incorporating the cartilage.
Conclusion: The 3D MRI-based cartilage models have high geometrical accuracy and biomechanical validity. These models offer a noninvasive tool for assessing cartilage morphology and joint mechanics, and may provide a foundation for future studies investigating the pathophysiology of elbow osteoarthritis.
目的:通过与激光扫描模型的比较,构建并验证基于mri的肘关节三维软骨模型,并通过有限元分析(FEA)评估软骨形态对关节内应力分布的影响。方法:采用高分辨率MRI(体素尺寸:0.375 × 0.375 × 0.400 mm)扫描7例经福尔马林固定的尸体肘部,根据噪比选择序列。重建肱骨远端、桡骨头和尺骨近端软骨模型,并对照激光扫描参考模型进行验证。验证指标包括软骨厚度差异、表面距离和Dice相似系数。随后,采用带软骨和不带软骨的模型,在生理负荷下进行有限元分析,评估关节内应力分布。结果:基于mri和激光扫描的模型显示出相似的软骨厚度分布,差异在成像分辨率内或接近成像分辨率。使用基于mri和激光扫描模型测量的中位软骨厚度在肱骨远端分别为1.15 mm (IQR 0.97至1.54)和1.25 mm (IQR 1.14至1.29),在桡骨头分别为1.15 mm (IQR 0.97至1.18)和1.03 mm (IQR 1.01至1.14),在尺骨近端分别为1.06 mm (IQR 0.93至1.21)和1.05 mm (IQR 1.00至1.10)。地面均方根距离< 0.40 mm, Dice系数大于0.96。有限元分析显示生理上合理的应力集中模式在解剖接触区只有在模型纳入软骨。结论:基于mri的三维软骨模型具有较高的几何精度和生物力学有效性。这些模型提供了一种评估软骨形态和关节力学的无创工具,并可能为未来研究肘关节骨关节炎的病理生理学提供基础。