The current standing of standard PCNL in the era of miniaturization.

IF 1.3 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urologia Journal Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-07 DOI:10.1177/03915603261457526
Deepak Prakash Bhirud, Jaideep Singh Soni, Shiv Charan Navriya, Vikram Singh, Gautam Ram Choudhary, Mahendra Singh, Arjun Singh Sandhu
{"title":"The current standing of standard PCNL in the era of miniaturization.","authors":"Deepak Prakash Bhirud, Jaideep Singh Soni, Shiv Charan Navriya, Vikram Singh, Gautam Ram Choudhary, Mahendra Singh, Arjun Singh Sandhu","doi":"10.1177/03915603261457526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate how standard operating procedures (SOPs), modification in puncture techniques, advancements in preoperative imaging to better understand calyceal anatomy have revitalized standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for large kidney stones (>2.5 cm).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At our center, renal stones are managed with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) according to stone characteristics and patient profile. Renal stones larger than 2.5 cm are managed with standard PCNL. In this retrospective study patients undergoing standard PCNL at a tertiary healthcare center from January 2018 to December 2023 having complete records were included. Data on demographics, stone characteristics, operative details, and outcomes were assessed using SPSS v26, with ethical approval ensuring confidentiality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 766 patients were included. Mean age was 43.75 ± 16.0 years; 69.7% were male. Mean stone size was 3.8 ± 1.2 cm, with 46.7% complex (Guy's Stone Score [GSS] ⩾ 2). Using a 24 ± 3 Fr sheath and 1.3 tracts per procedure, operative time averaged 92.5 ± 20.3 min. Stone clearance was 91.3%, with significant intraoperative bleeding (requiring transfusion) in 1.7%. Overall complication rate was 16.4%, and hospital stay averaged 3.6 ± 1.2 days; 8.7% required additional interventions, including RIRS in 44.3% of those cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Modern standard PCNL achieves high clearance (91.3%) with minimal morbidity, reaffirming its role for large stones despite mini-PCNL's rise.</p>","PeriodicalId":23574,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Journal","volume":" ","pages":"551-559"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603261457526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate how standard operating procedures (SOPs), modification in puncture techniques, advancements in preoperative imaging to better understand calyceal anatomy have revitalized standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for large kidney stones (>2.5 cm).

Methods: At our center, renal stones are managed with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) according to stone characteristics and patient profile. Renal stones larger than 2.5 cm are managed with standard PCNL. In this retrospective study patients undergoing standard PCNL at a tertiary healthcare center from January 2018 to December 2023 having complete records were included. Data on demographics, stone characteristics, operative details, and outcomes were assessed using SPSS v26, with ethical approval ensuring confidentiality.

Results: A total of 766 patients were included. Mean age was 43.75 ± 16.0 years; 69.7% were male. Mean stone size was 3.8 ± 1.2 cm, with 46.7% complex (Guy's Stone Score [GSS] ⩾ 2). Using a 24 ± 3 Fr sheath and 1.3 tracts per procedure, operative time averaged 92.5 ± 20.3 min. Stone clearance was 91.3%, with significant intraoperative bleeding (requiring transfusion) in 1.7%. Overall complication rate was 16.4%, and hospital stay averaged 3.6 ± 1.2 days; 8.7% required additional interventions, including RIRS in 44.3% of those cases.

Conclusion: Modern standard PCNL achieves high clearance (91.3%) with minimal morbidity, reaffirming its role for large stones despite mini-PCNL's rise.

标准PCNL在微型化时代的现状。
目的:评价标准操作程序(sop)、穿刺技术的改进、术前成像技术的进步,以更好地了解肾盏解剖,如何使标准经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)在治疗大肾结石(>2.5 cm)中重新发挥作用。方法:在我中心,根据结石特征和患者情况,采用体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)、经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)和逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗肾结石。大于2.5 cm的肾结石采用标准PCNL治疗。在这项回顾性研究中,纳入了2018年1月至2023年12月在三级医疗中心接受标准PCNL的患者,这些患者有完整的记录。人口统计学、结石特征、手术细节和结果的数据使用SPSS v26进行评估,并获得伦理批准以确保保密。结果:共纳入766例患者。平均年龄43.75±16.0岁;69.7%为男性。平均结石大小为3.8±1.2 cm,并发症为46.7%(盖伊结石评分[GSS]大于或等于2)。每次手术使用24±3fr鞘和1.3束,手术时间平均为92.5±20.3分钟。结石清除率为91.3%,术中明显出血(需要输血)的占1.7%。总并发症发生率16.4%,平均住院时间3.6±1.2天;8.7%的病例需要额外的干预措施,其中44.3%的病例需要RIRS。结论:现代标准PCNL获得了高清除率(91.3%)和低发病率,重申了其在大结石中的作用,尽管迷你PCNL有所增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urologia Journal
Urologia Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
66
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书