Statistical Inference in Database Exploitation: Sample Size and Confounding Factors.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Carmen Carazo-Díaz, Luis Prieto-Valiente
{"title":"Statistical Inference in Database Exploitation: Sample Size and Confounding Factors.","authors":"Carmen Carazo-Díaz, Luis Prieto-Valiente","doi":"10.31083/RN52643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Database (DB) exploitation is an essential tool in medical and epidemiological research, enabling the extraction of hidden insights from large volumes of information through statistical analysis. This work provides a methodological reflection on two critical aspects of such studies, namely sample size and confounder detection via multivariate analysis. When working with databases, researchers must perform statistical inference based exclusively on the available data and therefore often ask whether the fixed sample size is sufficient to detect relationships of interest. In most cases, no threshold value separates valid sizes from invalid ones, as statistical power increases gradually and depends on multiple parameters, with no fixed cutoff points. Even when the results are inconclusive (high <i>p</i>-values), possibly because of limited sample size, their publication is essential to feed future meta-analyses that may provide more solid conclusions. DB analysis requires discriminating between general and circumstantial associations. Although the relationships revealed by univariate analysis maintain their descriptive value, the accuracy of their interpretation can be increased by identifying possible confounding factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":21281,"journal":{"name":"Revista de neurologia","volume":"81 6","pages":"52643"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13339777/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/RN52643","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Database (DB) exploitation is an essential tool in medical and epidemiological research, enabling the extraction of hidden insights from large volumes of information through statistical analysis. This work provides a methodological reflection on two critical aspects of such studies, namely sample size and confounder detection via multivariate analysis. When working with databases, researchers must perform statistical inference based exclusively on the available data and therefore often ask whether the fixed sample size is sufficient to detect relationships of interest. In most cases, no threshold value separates valid sizes from invalid ones, as statistical power increases gradually and depends on multiple parameters, with no fixed cutoff points. Even when the results are inconclusive (high p-values), possibly because of limited sample size, their publication is essential to feed future meta-analyses that may provide more solid conclusions. DB analysis requires discriminating between general and circumstantial associations. Although the relationships revealed by univariate analysis maintain their descriptive value, the accuracy of their interpretation can be increased by identifying possible confounding factors.

数据库开发中的统计推断:样本量和混杂因素。
数据库(DB)利用是医学和流行病学研究中的重要工具,可以通过统计分析从大量信息中提取隐藏的见解。这项工作提供了对这类研究的两个关键方面的方法学反思,即样本量和通过多变量分析的混杂检测。当使用数据库时,研究人员必须完全基于可用数据进行统计推断,因此经常询问固定的样本量是否足以检测感兴趣的关系。在大多数情况下,没有阈值可以区分有效的大小和无效的大小,因为统计能力是逐渐增加的,并且取决于多个参数,没有固定的截止点。即使结果是不确定的(高p值),可能是因为有限的样本量,他们的发表对于将来的荟萃分析是必不可少的,这可能会提供更可靠的结论。DB分析需要区分一般关联和间接关联。虽然单变量分析揭示的关系保持其描述价值,但通过识别可能的混杂因素可以提高其解释的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de neurologia
Revista de neurologia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
117
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Revista de Neurología fomenta y difunde el conocimiento generado en lengua española sobre neurociencia, tanto clínica como experimental.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书