Adherence to international pharmacogenomic recommendations in pediatric cancer care: a cohort analysis embedded within the MARVEL-PIC randomized trial.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacogenomics Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-06 DOI:10.1080/14622416.2026.2685213
Aniket Chawla, Sean Carter, Roxanne Dyas, Elizabeth Williams, Claire Moore, Rachel Conyers
{"title":"Adherence to international pharmacogenomic recommendations in pediatric cancer care: a cohort analysis embedded within the MARVEL-PIC randomized trial.","authors":"Aniket Chawla, Sean Carter, Roxanne Dyas, Elizabeth Williams, Claire Moore, Rachel Conyers","doi":"10.1080/14622416.2026.2685213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing can optimize drug efficacy and minimize toxicity, but prescriber adherence to PGx recommendations remains unclear. We aimed to quantify clinician adherence to international PGx recommendations in a cohort of pediatric oncology patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed files of children with PGx recommendations generated through the MARVEL-PIC (NCT05667766) trial. Patients were included if ≥12 weeks had passed since their PGx report was released to clinicians. Prescribing events were identified for actionable and relevant PGx recommendations and classified as \"explicitly followed,\" \"inadvertently followed,\" or \"not followed.\" Adherence was assessed by patient, drug, and recommendation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2,063 PGx recommendations were available for 216 patients. Sixty‑four (3.1%) recommendations were actionable and relevant to 44 patients and 10 drugs within the 12-week study period. Recommendations were explicitly followed in 57/288 (19.8%) events, inadvertently followed in 145 (50.3%) events, and not followed in 86 (29.9%) prescribing events. Mercaptopurine demonstrated the highest explicit adherence (87.5%). No significant associations were observed between adherence and age group, disease group, drug type, or strength of recommendation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adherence to PGx recommendations was very low, highlighting a need to understand barriers to PGx implementation, increase education of healthcare professionals, and consider clinical decision support tools to facilitate adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":20018,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacogenomics","volume":" ","pages":"179-186"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13374781/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacogenomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14622416.2026.2685213","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing can optimize drug efficacy and minimize toxicity, but prescriber adherence to PGx recommendations remains unclear. We aimed to quantify clinician adherence to international PGx recommendations in a cohort of pediatric oncology patients.

Methods: We reviewed files of children with PGx recommendations generated through the MARVEL-PIC (NCT05667766) trial. Patients were included if ≥12 weeks had passed since their PGx report was released to clinicians. Prescribing events were identified for actionable and relevant PGx recommendations and classified as "explicitly followed," "inadvertently followed," or "not followed." Adherence was assessed by patient, drug, and recommendation.

Results: 2,063 PGx recommendations were available for 216 patients. Sixty‑four (3.1%) recommendations were actionable and relevant to 44 patients and 10 drugs within the 12-week study period. Recommendations were explicitly followed in 57/288 (19.8%) events, inadvertently followed in 145 (50.3%) events, and not followed in 86 (29.9%) prescribing events. Mercaptopurine demonstrated the highest explicit adherence (87.5%). No significant associations were observed between adherence and age group, disease group, drug type, or strength of recommendation.

Conclusion: Adherence to PGx recommendations was very low, highlighting a need to understand barriers to PGx implementation, increase education of healthcare professionals, and consider clinical decision support tools to facilitate adherence.

在儿童癌症治疗中遵守国际药物基因组学建议:一项嵌入在MARVEL-PIC随机试验中的队列分析
背景:药物基因组学(PGx)测试可以优化药物疗效和最小化毒性,但处方者对PGx建议的依从性尚不清楚。我们的目的是量化儿科肿瘤患者队列中临床医生对国际PGx建议的依从性。方法:我们回顾了通过MARVEL-PIC (NCT05667766)试验生成的PGx推荐儿童的文件。如果患者的PGx报告发布给临床医生后已经过了≥12周,则纳入患者。处方事件被确定为可操作的和相关的PGx建议,并被分类为“明确遵循”、“无意中遵循”或“未遵循”。依从性由患者、药物和推荐进行评估。结果:216例患者获得2063份PGx推荐。在12周的研究期间,64项(3.1%)建议是可操作的,与44名患者和10种药物相关。有57/288例(19.8%)事件明确遵循建议,145例(50.3%)事件无意间遵循建议,86例(29.9%)事件未遵循建议。巯基嘌呤表现出最高的显性依从性(87.5%)。没有观察到依从性与年龄组、疾病组、药物类型或推荐强度之间的显著关联。结论:PGx建议的依从性非常低,强调需要了解PGx实施的障碍,增加医疗保健专业人员的教育,并考虑临床决策支持工具以促进依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacogenomics
Pharmacogenomics 医学-药学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
9.50%
发文量
88
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmacogenomics (ISSN 1462-2416) is a peer-reviewed journal presenting reviews and reports by the researchers and decision-makers closely involved in this rapidly developing area. Key objectives are to provide the community with an essential resource for keeping abreast of the latest developments in all areas of this exciting field. Pharmacogenomics is the leading source of commentary and analysis, bringing you the highest quality expert analyses from corporate and academic opinion leaders in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书