{"title":"Understanding Postoperative Persistent Opioid Use: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.","authors":"Göknur Parlak, Seçil Taylan, Fatma Eti Aslan","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2026.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Worldwide, the clinical condition referred to as \"new persistent opioid use\" describes prolonged opioid use in the postoperative period. Long-term postoperative opioid use is associated with an increased risk of complications, opioid use disorder, overdose, and death. This study focuses on the subjective experiences of patients using opioids after surgery. The aim was to generate a nuanced understanding of the reasons for the continuation of postoperative opioid use and to elucidate how these experiences shape patients' perceptions, decision-making processes, and coping mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study is a thematic meta-synthesis of qualitative research.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines were followed, and the study was registered in PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; CRD4202661291520). The literature search was conducted on January 25, 2026. To identify relevant literature, MEDLINE, Web of Science (WOS), PubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane, Scopus, and Google Scholar were systematically searched, and studies meeting the inclusion criteria were selected.</p><p><strong>Review/analysis methods: </strong>Study data were analyzed in accordance with Thomas and Harden's three-stage thematic synthesis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-synthesis was conducted by analyzing eight qualitative studies carried out in four different countries, encompassing findings from a total of 310 patients who met the inclusion criteria. As a result of the analysis, four main themes and 12 subthemes were identified regarding surgical patients' experiences with pain and opioid use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The synthesis of the studies included in this research reveals patients' experiences with postoperative pain and opioid use. It demonstrates that pain relief is not the sole reason for postoperative opioid use; opioids are also used to maintain functionality and to facilitate a return to daily life. Our findings highlight the need for patient-centered approaches, as well as education and guidance, when planning interventions aimed at preventing persistent opioid use.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2026.06.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Worldwide, the clinical condition referred to as "new persistent opioid use" describes prolonged opioid use in the postoperative period. Long-term postoperative opioid use is associated with an increased risk of complications, opioid use disorder, overdose, and death. This study focuses on the subjective experiences of patients using opioids after surgery. The aim was to generate a nuanced understanding of the reasons for the continuation of postoperative opioid use and to elucidate how these experiences shape patients' perceptions, decision-making processes, and coping mechanisms.
Design: This study is a thematic meta-synthesis of qualitative research.
Data sources: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines were followed, and the study was registered in PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; CRD4202661291520). The literature search was conducted on January 25, 2026. To identify relevant literature, MEDLINE, Web of Science (WOS), PubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane, Scopus, and Google Scholar were systematically searched, and studies meeting the inclusion criteria were selected.
Review/analysis methods: Study data were analyzed in accordance with Thomas and Harden's three-stage thematic synthesis approach.
Results: This meta-synthesis was conducted by analyzing eight qualitative studies carried out in four different countries, encompassing findings from a total of 310 patients who met the inclusion criteria. As a result of the analysis, four main themes and 12 subthemes were identified regarding surgical patients' experiences with pain and opioid use.
Conclusion: The synthesis of the studies included in this research reveals patients' experiences with postoperative pain and opioid use. It demonstrates that pain relief is not the sole reason for postoperative opioid use; opioids are also used to maintain functionality and to facilitate a return to daily life. Our findings highlight the need for patient-centered approaches, as well as education and guidance, when planning interventions aimed at preventing persistent opioid use.
目的:在世界范围内,临床状况被称为“新的持续性阿片类药物使用”,用于描述术后阿片类药物使用时间延长。术后长期使用阿片类药物与并发症、阿片类药物使用障碍、过量使用和死亡风险增加相关。本研究关注的是术后使用阿片类药物患者的主观体验。目的是对术后继续使用阿片类药物的原因有一个细致入微的理解,并阐明这些经历如何塑造患者的观念、决策过程和应对机制。设计:本研究是定性研究的主题综合。数据来源:遵循系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA) 2020指南,该研究已在PROSPERO(国际前瞻性系统评价登记册;CRD4202661291520)注册。文献检索于2026年1月25日进行。为确定相关文献,系统检索MEDLINE、Web of Science (WOS)、PubMed、EBSCO、Cochrane、Scopus和谷歌Scholar,筛选出符合纳入标准的研究。回顾/分析方法:根据Thomas和Harden的三阶段主题综合方法分析研究数据。结果:本荟萃综合分析了在四个不同国家进行的八项定性研究,涵盖了符合纳入标准的310名患者的研究结果。作为分析的结果,确定了关于手术患者疼痛和阿片类药物使用经历的四个主要主题和12个次要主题。结论:综合本研究纳入的研究揭示了患者术后疼痛和阿片类药物使用的经历。这表明疼痛缓解不是术后阿片类药物使用的唯一原因;阿片类药物也用于维持功能和促进恢复日常生活。我们的研究结果强调,在计划旨在防止持续使用阿片类药物的干预措施时,需要以患者为中心的方法,以及教育和指导。
期刊介绍:
This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.