Content Gaps and Informational Quality of TikTok and Bilibili Videos on Pit and Fissure Sealing in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Feng Cai, Wending Gao, Linhu Wang
{"title":"Content Gaps and Informational Quality of TikTok and Bilibili Videos on Pit and Fissure Sealing in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Feng Cai, Wending Gao, Linhu Wang","doi":"10.3290/j.ohpd.c_2759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the disease-specific content coverage, overall quality, reliability, and transparency of Chinese-language short videos on pit and fissure sealing posted on TikTok and Bilibili.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, videos were retrieved from TikTok and Bilibili on December 20, 2025, using the Chinese search term '' (pit and fissure sealing). The first 150 results from each platform were screened, and 204 eligible videos were included. Overall quality, reliability, and transparency were assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS), modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), and Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, respectively. A predefined disease-specific coding framework was used to evaluate content coverage. Group comparisons, Spearman's rank correlation, and multivariable ordered logistic regression were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Benefits and indications were the most frequently covered domains, appearing in 87.75% and 78.92% of videos, respectively, whereas contraindications and cost were addressed in only 21.57% and 28.92%. The median GQS, mDISCERN, and JAMA scores were all 3.00. No significant differences in validated assessment scores were observed between TikTok and Bilibili. Videos uploaded by healthcare professionals, especially specialised healthcare professionals, achieved higher scores than those uploaded by individual users. Video duration showed weak positive correlations with validated assessment scores, whereas engagement indicators were not meaningfully associated with informational quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Short videos on pit and fissure sealing provide moderately useful information, but content coverage remains incomplete and uneven. Greater participation by healthcare professionals and better access to balanced, trustworthy preventive information are needed on short-video platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":19696,"journal":{"name":"Oral health & preventive dentistry","volume":"24 ","pages":"527-539"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13339210/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral health & preventive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ohpd.c_2759","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the disease-specific content coverage, overall quality, reliability, and transparency of Chinese-language short videos on pit and fissure sealing posted on TikTok and Bilibili.

Methods and materials: In this cross-sectional study, videos were retrieved from TikTok and Bilibili on December 20, 2025, using the Chinese search term '' (pit and fissure sealing). The first 150 results from each platform were screened, and 204 eligible videos were included. Overall quality, reliability, and transparency were assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS), modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), and Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, respectively. A predefined disease-specific coding framework was used to evaluate content coverage. Group comparisons, Spearman's rank correlation, and multivariable ordered logistic regression were performed.

Results: Benefits and indications were the most frequently covered domains, appearing in 87.75% and 78.92% of videos, respectively, whereas contraindications and cost were addressed in only 21.57% and 28.92%. The median GQS, mDISCERN, and JAMA scores were all 3.00. No significant differences in validated assessment scores were observed between TikTok and Bilibili. Videos uploaded by healthcare professionals, especially specialised healthcare professionals, achieved higher scores than those uploaded by individual users. Video duration showed weak positive correlations with validated assessment scores, whereas engagement indicators were not meaningfully associated with informational quality.

Conclusion: Short videos on pit and fissure sealing provide moderately useful information, but content coverage remains incomplete and uneven. Greater participation by healthcare professionals and better access to balanced, trustworthy preventive information are needed on short-video platforms.

TikTok和Bilibili视频在中国坑缝密封的内容差距和信息质量:一项横断面研究。
目的:评估抖音和哔哩哔哩上发布的窝裂封堵中文短视频的疾病内容覆盖率、整体质量、可靠性和透明度。方法与材料:在本横断面研究中,使用中文搜索词“(坑裂密封)”,于2025年12月20日在抖音和哔哩哔哩上检索视频。每个平台的前150个结果被筛选,并包括204个符合条件的视频。总体质量、可靠性和透明度分别采用全球质量评分(GQS)、修改后的DISCERN (mDISCERN)和美国医学会杂志(JAMA)基准标准进行评估。使用预定义的疾病特定编码框架来评估内容覆盖率。进行分组比较、Spearman秩相关和多变量有序逻辑回归。结果:疗效和适应症是最常涉及的领域,分别出现在87.75%和78.92%的视频中,而禁忌症和成本仅占21.57%和28.92%。GQS、mDISCERN和JAMA评分的中位数均为3.00。抖音和哔哩哔哩的有效评估得分无显著差异。医护专业人员(特别是专业医护专业人员)上传的视频得分高于个人用户上传的视频。视频时长与有效的评估分数呈弱正相关,而参与指标与信息质量没有意义的关联。结论:短视频提供了中等有用的信息,但内容覆盖不完整且不均匀。短视频平台需要更多医疗保健专业人员的参与,以及更好地获取平衡、可靠的预防信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oral health & preventive dentistry
Oral health & preventive dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinicians, general practitioners, teachers, researchers, and public health administrators will find this journal an indispensable source of essential, timely information about scientific progress in the fields of oral health and the prevention of caries, periodontal diseases, oral mucosal diseases, and dental trauma. Central topics, including oral hygiene, oral epidemiology, oral health promotion, and public health issues, are covered in peer-reviewed articles such as clinical and basic science research reports; reviews; invited focus articles, commentaries, and guest editorials; and symposium, workshop, and conference proceedings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书