Clinical Nuances of Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: A Literature Review.

IF 4.7 4区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-06 DOI:10.1097/OGX.0000000000001575
Adwoa A Baffoe-Bonnie, Sara Jones, Elizabeth Livingston, Jeffrey A Kuller, Sarah K Dotters-Katz
{"title":"Clinical Nuances of Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: A Literature Review.","authors":"Adwoa A Baffoe-Bonnie, Sara Jones, Elizabeth Livingston, Jeffrey A Kuller, Sarah K Dotters-Katz","doi":"10.1097/OGX.0000000000001575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) presents significant challenges in obstetric care, particularly due to its association with both maternal and neonatal morbidity. Management becomes even more complex when PPROM occurs in the context of coexisting maternal conditions or atypical clinical scenarios.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review common clinical challenges in the management of PPROM and summarize the available evidence on outcomes and current recommendations.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed to identify relevant studies, systematic reviews, and practice guidelines. Articles addressing PPROM complicated by concurrent maternal, fetal, or obstetric conditions were reviewed and synthesized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Evidence remains limited in many nuanced clinical scenarios involving PPROM. Studies suggest that outcomes and management may differ in cases of PPROM occurring near the limit of viability, with coexisting infections (eg, HSV or HIV), in the setting of cerclage, or in twin gestations. Although guidelines support expectant management of otherwise uncomplicated cases occurring at <34 0/7 weeks' gestation, individualization of care is often necessary. Factors such as gestational age, presence of infection or labor, cerclage status, and maternal comorbidities influence decision-making. Shared decision-making is critical, and emerging tools, such as amniotic fluid biomarkers, may aid in guiding clinical choices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PPROM management must be tailored to the clinical context. While general recommendations exist, special scenarios require individualized care based on available evidence and patient values.</p><p><strong>Relevance: </strong>This review provides insight into management strategies and expected outcomes in complex cases of PPROM, supporting clinicians in navigating less straightforward presentations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19409,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey","volume":"81 7","pages":"361-369"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0000000000001575","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) presents significant challenges in obstetric care, particularly due to its association with both maternal and neonatal morbidity. Management becomes even more complex when PPROM occurs in the context of coexisting maternal conditions or atypical clinical scenarios.

Objective: To review common clinical challenges in the management of PPROM and summarize the available evidence on outcomes and current recommendations.

Evidence acquisition: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed to identify relevant studies, systematic reviews, and practice guidelines. Articles addressing PPROM complicated by concurrent maternal, fetal, or obstetric conditions were reviewed and synthesized.

Results: Evidence remains limited in many nuanced clinical scenarios involving PPROM. Studies suggest that outcomes and management may differ in cases of PPROM occurring near the limit of viability, with coexisting infections (eg, HSV or HIV), in the setting of cerclage, or in twin gestations. Although guidelines support expectant management of otherwise uncomplicated cases occurring at <34 0/7 weeks' gestation, individualization of care is often necessary. Factors such as gestational age, presence of infection or labor, cerclage status, and maternal comorbidities influence decision-making. Shared decision-making is critical, and emerging tools, such as amniotic fluid biomarkers, may aid in guiding clinical choices.

Conclusions: PPROM management must be tailored to the clinical context. While general recommendations exist, special scenarios require individualized care based on available evidence and patient values.

Relevance: This review provides insight into management strategies and expected outcomes in complex cases of PPROM, supporting clinicians in navigating less straightforward presentations.

早产产前胎膜破裂的临床差异:文献综述。
重要性:早产胎膜早破(PPROM)在产科护理中提出了重大挑战,特别是由于其与孕产妇和新生儿发病率相关。当PPROM发生在共存的产妇条件或非典型临床情况的背景下,管理变得更加复杂。目的:回顾PPROM治疗中常见的临床挑战,总结现有的结局证据和目前的建议。证据获取:使用PubMed进行了全面的文献检索,以确定相关研究、系统评价和实践指南。文章解决PPROM并发的产妇,胎儿,或产科条件进行了审查和综合。结果:在涉及PPROM的许多细微的临床情况中,证据仍然有限。研究表明,PPROM发生在生存能力极限附近,同时存在感染(如HSV或HIV),结扎或双胎妊娠,其结局和处理可能会有所不同。结论:PPROM的治疗必须根据临床情况量身定制。虽然存在一般建议,但特殊情况需要根据现有证据和患者价值观进行个性化护理。相关性:本综述提供了对复杂PPROM病例的管理策略和预期结果的见解,支持临床医生导航不太直接的报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
245
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Each monthly issue of Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey presents summaries of the most timely and clinically relevant research being published worldwide. These concise, easy-to-read summaries provide expert insight into how to apply the latest research to patient care. The accompanying editorial commentary puts the studies into perspective and supplies authoritative guidance. The result is a valuable, time-saving resource for busy clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书