Echocardiographic changes following dual-chamber pacemaker implantation at a Malaysian tertiary heart center.

Q2 Medicine
Si Ling Soh, Ian J Y Wee, Rowina Lynne Murray Binti Jeffery Murray, Suraya Hani Kamsani, Aslannif Roslan, Azlan Hussin
{"title":"Echocardiographic changes following dual-chamber pacemaker implantation at a Malaysian tertiary heart center.","authors":"Si Ling Soh, Ian J Y Wee, Rowina Lynne Murray Binti Jeffery Murray, Suraya Hani Kamsani, Aslannif Roslan, Azlan Hussin","doi":"10.1186/s44348-026-00077-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dual-chamber pacemaker implantation restores atrioventricular synchrony, but it might be associated with alterations in ventricular mechanics and valvular function. The echocardiographic effects of dual-chamber pacing in contemporary practice remain incompletely characterized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective single-center study of patients who underwent dual-chamber pacemaker implantation and had transthoracic echocardiography performed before and after implantation in 2022. Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), ventricular and atrial functional parameters, strain-derived measures, and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) severity were assessed using paired statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 57 patients were included. The mean LVEF declined from 59.6% before implantation to 55.8% after implantation (mean change, - 3.76%; 95% confidence interval [CI], - 7.45 to 0.08; P = 0.051). Among the strain-based measures, right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RVGLS) worsened by a mean of 3.10% (95% CI, 0.73 to 5.48; P = 0.012), and left atrial conduit strain (LAScd) declined by 3.74% (95% CI, 3.11 to 4.37; P = 0.032) following pacemaker implantation. Stuart-Maxwell testing showed no significant overall shift in TR severity following pacemaker implantation (χ<sup>2</sup> = 24.94, P = 0.678). The left atrial volume index decreased significantly (38.98 ± 17.16 mL/m<sup>2</sup> vs. 34.38 ± 12.65 mL/m<sup>2</sup>, P = 0.023), but it showed no correlation with LAScd at baseline (ρ =  - 0.183, P = 0.265) or with changes in LAScd over time (ρ = 0.160, P = 0.350). In regression analyses, increasing age was independently associated with greater decline in LAScd (β =  - 0.323 per year; 95% CI, - 0.494 to - 0.152; P < 0.001). A high pacing burden (> 20%) was not associated with changes in LVEF, LAScd, or RVGLS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dual-chamber pacemaker implantation was associated with early deterioration in myocardial deformation, particularly RVGLS and LAScd, despite preserved conventional systolic parameters. These functional changes were not accompanied by structural remodeling and were independent of TR progression, supporting a mechanism related to pacing-induced dyssynchrony and altered ventricular-atrial coupling. Strain imaging could offer incremental value in detecting early subclinical dysfunction in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":15229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13335278/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44348-026-00077-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dual-chamber pacemaker implantation restores atrioventricular synchrony, but it might be associated with alterations in ventricular mechanics and valvular function. The echocardiographic effects of dual-chamber pacing in contemporary practice remain incompletely characterized.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center study of patients who underwent dual-chamber pacemaker implantation and had transthoracic echocardiography performed before and after implantation in 2022. Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), ventricular and atrial functional parameters, strain-derived measures, and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) severity were assessed using paired statistical analyses.

Results: In total, 57 patients were included. The mean LVEF declined from 59.6% before implantation to 55.8% after implantation (mean change, - 3.76%; 95% confidence interval [CI], - 7.45 to 0.08; P = 0.051). Among the strain-based measures, right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RVGLS) worsened by a mean of 3.10% (95% CI, 0.73 to 5.48; P = 0.012), and left atrial conduit strain (LAScd) declined by 3.74% (95% CI, 3.11 to 4.37; P = 0.032) following pacemaker implantation. Stuart-Maxwell testing showed no significant overall shift in TR severity following pacemaker implantation (χ2 = 24.94, P = 0.678). The left atrial volume index decreased significantly (38.98 ± 17.16 mL/m2 vs. 34.38 ± 12.65 mL/m2, P = 0.023), but it showed no correlation with LAScd at baseline (ρ =  - 0.183, P = 0.265) or with changes in LAScd over time (ρ = 0.160, P = 0.350). In regression analyses, increasing age was independently associated with greater decline in LAScd (β =  - 0.323 per year; 95% CI, - 0.494 to - 0.152; P < 0.001). A high pacing burden (> 20%) was not associated with changes in LVEF, LAScd, or RVGLS.

Conclusions: Dual-chamber pacemaker implantation was associated with early deterioration in myocardial deformation, particularly RVGLS and LAScd, despite preserved conventional systolic parameters. These functional changes were not accompanied by structural remodeling and were independent of TR progression, supporting a mechanism related to pacing-induced dyssynchrony and altered ventricular-atrial coupling. Strain imaging could offer incremental value in detecting early subclinical dysfunction in this population.

马来西亚三级心脏中心双室起搏器植入后的超声心动图变化。
背景:双室起搏器植入可恢复房室同步,但可能与心室力学和瓣膜功能的改变有关。双室起搏的超声心动图效果在当代实践中仍不完全表征。方法:我们对2022年接受双室起搏器植入并在植入前后行经胸超声心动图检查的患者进行回顾性单中心研究。采用配对统计分析评估左心室射血分数(LVEF)、心室和心房功能参数、应变衍生测量和三尖瓣反流(TR)严重程度的变化。结果:共纳入57例患者。平均LVEF从种植前的59.6%下降到种植后的55.8%(平均变化为- 3.76%;95%可信区间[CI], - 7.45 ~ 0.08; P = 0.051)。在以应变为基础的测量中,起搏器植入后,右心室总纵向应变(RVGLS)平均恶化3.10% (95% CI, 0.73 ~ 5.48; P = 0.012),左房导管应变(LAScd)下降3.74% (95% CI, 3.11 ~ 4.37; P = 0.032)。斯图尔特-麦克斯韦检验显示,起搏器植入后TR严重程度总体上没有显著变化(χ2 = 24.94, P = 0.678)。左房容积指数明显下降(38.98±17.16 mL/m2 vs. 34.38±12.65 mL/m2, P = 0.023),但与基线时LAScd (ρ = - 0.183, P = 0.265)或随时间LAScd的变化(ρ = 0.160, P = 0.350)无相关性。在回归分析中,年龄的增加与LAScd的较大下降独立相关(β = - 0.323 /年;95% CI, - 0.494至- 0.152;P为20%),而与LVEF、LAScd或RVGLS的变化无关。结论:双腔起搏器植入与早期心肌变形恶化有关,尤其是RVGLS和LAScd,尽管保留了常规收缩参数。这些功能变化不伴有结构重构,与TR进展无关,支持与起搏诱导的非同步化和心室-心房偶联改变有关的机制。应变成像在检测这一人群的早期亚临床功能障碍方面可以提供增量价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书