Sex differences of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a nationwide cohort study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Hack-Lyoung Kim, Yoonjong Bae, Mina Kim, Haechan Cho, Hyun Sung Joh, Woo-Hyun Lim, Jae-Bin Seo, Sang-Hyun Kim, Myung-A Kim
{"title":"Sex differences of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a nationwide cohort study.","authors":"Hack-Lyoung Kim, Yoonjong Bae, Mina Kim, Haechan Cho, Hyun Sung Joh, Woo-Hyun Lim, Jae-Bin Seo, Sang-Hyun Kim, Myung-A Kim","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sex differences in outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain debated, and evidence from large Asian populations is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 136 109 patients (101 301 men; 34 808 women) without prior major cardiovascular events who underwent PCI between 2004 and 2020, using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service. Baseline characteristics, in-hospital events, and long-term clinical outcomes were compared. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, repeat PCI, coronary artery bypass surgery, and ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women were older and had higher rates of hypertension and diabetes, whereas men had higher smoking and alcohol consumption rates. In-hospital adverse events, including death, ischemic stroke, and bleeding were more frequent in women (P < 0.001). However, during a mean follow-up of 3.1 years, women had a lower incidence of MACE compared to men (58.0 vs. 65.3%; P < 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression confirmed that female sex was independently associated with a lower long-term risk of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.69-0.82, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite worse in-hospital outcomes, women had a more favorable long-term prognosis after PCI compared to men. These findings emphasize the importance of sex-specific approaches in risk assessment and long-term management after PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronary artery disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001660","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sex differences in outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain debated, and evidence from large Asian populations is limited.

Methods: We analyzed 136 109 patients (101 301 men; 34 808 women) without prior major cardiovascular events who underwent PCI between 2004 and 2020, using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service. Baseline characteristics, in-hospital events, and long-term clinical outcomes were compared. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, repeat PCI, coronary artery bypass surgery, and ischemic stroke.

Results: Women were older and had higher rates of hypertension and diabetes, whereas men had higher smoking and alcohol consumption rates. In-hospital adverse events, including death, ischemic stroke, and bleeding were more frequent in women (P < 0.001). However, during a mean follow-up of 3.1 years, women had a lower incidence of MACE compared to men (58.0 vs. 65.3%; P < 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression confirmed that female sex was independently associated with a lower long-term risk of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.69-0.82, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Despite worse in-hospital outcomes, women had a more favorable long-term prognosis after PCI compared to men. These findings emphasize the importance of sex-specific approaches in risk assessment and long-term management after PCI.

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者临床结果的性别差异:一项全国性队列研究。
背景:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后结果的性别差异仍有争议,来自亚洲大量人群的证据有限。方法:我们分析了2004年至2020年间接受PCI治疗的136 109例患者(101 301名男性;34 808名女性),这些患者之前没有重大心血管事件,使用的数据来自韩国国民健康保险服务。比较基线特征、院内事件和长期临床结果。主要终点是主要心血管不良事件(MACE),定义为全因死亡、非致死性心肌梗死、重复PCI、冠状动脉搭桥手术和缺血性卒中的复合。结果:女性年龄较大,高血压和糖尿病的发病率较高,而男性的吸烟率和饮酒率较高。住院不良事件,包括死亡、缺血性卒中和出血在女性中更常见(P结论:尽管住院结果较差,但与男性相比,女性PCI术后的长期预后更好。这些发现强调了在PCI术后风险评估和长期管理中性别特异性方法的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Coronary artery disease
Coronary artery disease 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
190
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Coronary Artery Disease welcomes reports of original research with a clinical emphasis, including observational studies, clinical trials, translational research, novel imaging, pharmacology and interventional approaches as well as advances in laboratory research that contribute to the understanding of coronary artery disease. Each issue of Coronary Artery Disease is divided into four areas of focus: Original Research articles, Review in Depth articles by leading experts in the field, Editorials and Images in Coronary Artery Disease. The Editorials will comment on selected original research published in each issue of Coronary Artery Disease, as well as highlight controversies in coronary artery disease understanding and management. Submitted artcles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and​ peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书