Associations between government-supported institutional long-term care and health outcomes among socioeconomically disadvantaged older adults in China.
IF 5.2 2区 医学Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Qiufeng Gao, Yuxin Jiang, Xintong Wang, Bei Zhou, Yaojiang Shi
{"title":"Associations between government-supported institutional long-term care and health outcomes among socioeconomically disadvantaged older adults in China.","authors":"Qiufeng Gao, Yuxin Jiang, Xintong Wang, Bei Zhou, Yaojiang Shi","doi":"10.1186/s12939-026-02940-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although Long-Term Care (LTC) benefits aging populations, evidence on government-supported LTC for socioeconomically disadvantaged older adults in low- and middle-income countries remains limited. This study examines how government-supported institutional LTC is associated with physical and mental health outcomes among welfare-dependent older adults in rural China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis was conducted among 313 welfare recipients aged 60 and above in Shaanxi Province. Health outcomes were assessed using validated measures of physical health (self-rated health, pain, functional limitations) and mental health (depression, anxiety, loneliness). Regression models and propensity score matching were used to examine associations, and potential mechanisms were further explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Government-supported institutional LTC was significantly associated with better physical and mental health, particularly higher self-rated health (ATT = 0.177, p = 0.005; β = 0.079, p = 0.006) and lower anxiety (ATT=-0.288, p < 0.001; β=-0.146, p = 0.016). Longer stays were associated with more favorable health patterns. Mechanism analyses suggested that these associations may relate to age-friendly environments, improved healthcare access, enhanced social participation, and better nutritional conditions. Heterogeneity analyses indicated the associations were stronger among older, illiterate individuals and those with family guardians, particularly male guardians.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides robust empirical evidence of associations between government-supported institutional LTC and better health outcomes among socioeconomically disadvantaged older adults, highlighting its potential role in enhancing well-being in rural settings. These findings emphasize the importance of expanding equitable, integrated, and high-quality LTC services to support sustainable, person-centered aging care for vulnerable populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13621641/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-026-02940-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Although Long-Term Care (LTC) benefits aging populations, evidence on government-supported LTC for socioeconomically disadvantaged older adults in low- and middle-income countries remains limited. This study examines how government-supported institutional LTC is associated with physical and mental health outcomes among welfare-dependent older adults in rural China.
Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted among 313 welfare recipients aged 60 and above in Shaanxi Province. Health outcomes were assessed using validated measures of physical health (self-rated health, pain, functional limitations) and mental health (depression, anxiety, loneliness). Regression models and propensity score matching were used to examine associations, and potential mechanisms were further explored.
Results: Government-supported institutional LTC was significantly associated with better physical and mental health, particularly higher self-rated health (ATT = 0.177, p = 0.005; β = 0.079, p = 0.006) and lower anxiety (ATT=-0.288, p < 0.001; β=-0.146, p = 0.016). Longer stays were associated with more favorable health patterns. Mechanism analyses suggested that these associations may relate to age-friendly environments, improved healthcare access, enhanced social participation, and better nutritional conditions. Heterogeneity analyses indicated the associations were stronger among older, illiterate individuals and those with family guardians, particularly male guardians.
Conclusions: This study provides robust empirical evidence of associations between government-supported institutional LTC and better health outcomes among socioeconomically disadvantaged older adults, highlighting its potential role in enhancing well-being in rural settings. These findings emphasize the importance of expanding equitable, integrated, and high-quality LTC services to support sustainable, person-centered aging care for vulnerable populations.
期刊介绍：
International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
