Physicians' preferences for the use of clinical decision support systems in the context of acutely ill children presenting to ambulatory care: a focus group study.

IF 5.5 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Hannelore Dillen, Annelien Dankaerts, Daniëlle Snijders, Lennart Verlinden, Laure Wynants, Jan Y Verbakel
{"title":"Physicians' preferences for the use of clinical decision support systems in the context of acutely ill children presenting to ambulatory care: a focus group study.","authors":"Hannelore Dillen, Annelien Dankaerts, Daniëlle Snijders, Lennart Verlinden, Laure Wynants, Jan Y Verbakel","doi":"10.1186/s12911-026-03670-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acutely ill children are at risk of receiving unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions, yet within this context, clinical decision support systems (CDSS) have the potential to improve clinicians' prescribing behaviour. Since the uptake of CDSS is limited, research into the facilitators and barriers to its use and the preferred content and functions is needed to promote its use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four focus groups were conducted among Belgian general practitioners, paediatricians, and ear/nose/throat physicians. The groups took place in a university building, a regional hospital, and online, and were semi-structured according to the interview guide. We transcribed recordings and performed reflexive thematic analysis. All participants were asked to provide feedback on the final themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five physicians participated in the study. The analysis produced four themes: (i) Physicians prefer a pragmatic approach completing the CDSS, with as little additional work as possible; (ii) The comprehensive advice given by the CDSS should be concise, unambiguous, and presented clearly; (iii) The CDSS can reduce diagnostic uncertainty, especially by making physicians aware of alarm symptoms of serious illness; (iv) The scope should be determined beforehand, and implementation should consider reliability and technical barriers. Participants proposed several possibilities for the content and functions of the CDSS, which are informed by their workload, clinical uncertainty, and their emphasis on professional autonomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study contribute to the development of a user-friendly CDSS for the assessment of acutely ill children in ambulatory care. Physicians prefer a CDSS that is pragmatic to apply and shows clear guidance on diagnostics and disease management, including support to reduce uncertainty regarding illness severity. The implementation of a CDSS plays a pivotal role in enhancing antimicrobial stewardship.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13621462/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-026-03670-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acutely ill children are at risk of receiving unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions, yet within this context, clinical decision support systems (CDSS) have the potential to improve clinicians' prescribing behaviour. Since the uptake of CDSS is limited, research into the facilitators and barriers to its use and the preferred content and functions is needed to promote its use.

Methods: Four focus groups were conducted among Belgian general practitioners, paediatricians, and ear/nose/throat physicians. The groups took place in a university building, a regional hospital, and online, and were semi-structured according to the interview guide. We transcribed recordings and performed reflexive thematic analysis. All participants were asked to provide feedback on the final themes.

Results: Twenty-five physicians participated in the study. The analysis produced four themes: (i) Physicians prefer a pragmatic approach completing the CDSS, with as little additional work as possible; (ii) The comprehensive advice given by the CDSS should be concise, unambiguous, and presented clearly; (iii) The CDSS can reduce diagnostic uncertainty, especially by making physicians aware of alarm symptoms of serious illness; (iv) The scope should be determined beforehand, and implementation should consider reliability and technical barriers. Participants proposed several possibilities for the content and functions of the CDSS, which are informed by their workload, clinical uncertainty, and their emphasis on professional autonomy.

Conclusions: The results of this study contribute to the development of a user-friendly CDSS for the assessment of acutely ill children in ambulatory care. Physicians prefer a CDSS that is pragmatic to apply and shows clear guidance on diagnostics and disease management, including support to reduce uncertainty regarding illness severity. The implementation of a CDSS plays a pivotal role in enhancing antimicrobial stewardship.

医生对门诊急症儿童使用临床决策支持系统的偏好:焦点小组研究。
背景:急性患儿有接受不必要抗生素处方的风险,然而在这种情况下,临床决策支持系统(CDSS)有可能改善临床医生的处方行为。由于CDSS的采用是有限的,因此需要研究其使用的促进因素和障碍以及首选的内容和功能,以促进其使用。方法:在比利时全科医生、儿科医生和耳鼻喉科医生中进行了四个焦点小组的研究。这些小组分别在大学大楼、地区医院和网上进行,并根据面试指南进行了半结构化。我们对录音进行转录并进行反身性主题分析。所有参与者都被要求对最后的主题提供反馈。结果:25名医生参与了研究。分析产生了四个主题:(i)医生更喜欢以务实的方式完成CDSS,尽可能少地增加工作;CDSS提供的全面意见应简明、明确和清楚地提出;(三)CDSS可以减少诊断的不确定性,特别是通过使医生了解严重疾病的警报症状;范围应事先确定,执行时应考虑到可靠性和技术障碍。与会者根据他们的工作量、临床的不确定性和他们对专业自主权的强调,对CDSS的内容和功能提出了几种可能性。结论:本研究的结果有助于开发一个用户友好的CDSS来评估急性病儿童的门诊护理。医生更喜欢实用的CDSS,并在诊断和疾病管理方面提供明确的指导,包括支持减少疾病严重程度的不确定性。CDSS的实施在加强抗菌素管理方面起着关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书