Felix Engel, Claudia Giuliani, Manuel Watter, Aref Kalantari, Karin Schuller, Harald Binder, Klaus Kaier
{"title":"From manual entry to machine precision: challenges and evolution of metadata schema development in collaborative research centers.","authors":"Felix Engel, Claudia Giuliani, Manuel Watter, Aref Kalantari, Karin Schuller, Harald Binder, Klaus Kaier","doi":"10.1186/s13104-026-07937-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Metadata standardization in collaborative biomedical research must balance interoperability with domain-specific detail. We describe a parent-template approach in which a baseline schema from the nephrology-focused CRC 1453 NephGen was adapted for the tumor-immunology CRC OncoEscape and the perinatal-immunology CRC Pilot.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The derivation process produced three structurally compatible yet vocabulary-divergent schemas. Pilot required the highest granularity (324 levels), followed by NephGen (287) and OncoEscape (283). Vocabulary reuse from the NephGen baseline was limited: 134 of 283 OncoEscape levels (47%) and 113 of 324 Pilot levels (35%) were retained unchanged. The main adaptations were not only expanded level lists, such as cell lines and mouse lines, but also new CRC-specific query dimensions, including \"Oncogenes\" in OncoEscape and \"Timeline\" in Pilot. In the context of AI-assisted extraction, we use the term instruction set to denote a schema that specifies target fields, expected granularity, example values, and validation resources for each metadata dimension, rather than a simple drop-down form or a free-text prompt template.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13339696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-026-07937-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Metadata standardization in collaborative biomedical research must balance interoperability with domain-specific detail. We describe a parent-template approach in which a baseline schema from the nephrology-focused CRC 1453 NephGen was adapted for the tumor-immunology CRC OncoEscape and the perinatal-immunology CRC Pilot.
Results: The derivation process produced three structurally compatible yet vocabulary-divergent schemas. Pilot required the highest granularity (324 levels), followed by NephGen (287) and OncoEscape (283). Vocabulary reuse from the NephGen baseline was limited: 134 of 283 OncoEscape levels (47%) and 113 of 324 Pilot levels (35%) were retained unchanged. The main adaptations were not only expanded level lists, such as cell lines and mouse lines, but also new CRC-specific query dimensions, including "Oncogenes" in OncoEscape and "Timeline" in Pilot. In the context of AI-assisted extraction, we use the term instruction set to denote a schema that specifies target fields, expected granularity, example values, and validation resources for each metadata dimension, rather than a simple drop-down form or a free-text prompt template.
BMC Research NotesBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍:
BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.