Should occult contralateral inguinal hernias be repaired during unilateral TAPP? A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Hernia Pub Date : 2026-07-07 DOI:10.1007/s10029-026-03773-w
Maria Clara Morais, Denise Padilha Abs de Almeida, Thiago Souza E Silva, Raquel Nogueira, Diego Camacho, Leandro Totti Cavazzola, Flavio Malcher, Diego Laurentino Lima
{"title":"Should occult contralateral inguinal hernias be repaired during unilateral TAPP? A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.","authors":"Maria Clara Morais, Denise Padilha Abs de Almeida, Thiago Souza E Silva, Raquel Nogueira, Diego Camacho, Leandro Totti Cavazzola, Flavio Malcher, Diego Laurentino Lima","doi":"10.1007/s10029-026-03773-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Occult inguinal hernias (OIH) are frequently detected during laparoscopic repair of unilateral inguinal hernias due to direct visualization of the contralateral groin. However, the optimal management of these asymptomatic defects remains debated. This systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and postoperative outcomes of contralateral OIH repaired during transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched from inception to February 2026 for studies including adult patients undergoing TAPP repair with intraoperative identification of contralateral OIH. Due to heterogeneous reporting and inconsistent measures of dispersion, comparative meta-analysis was not feasible. A single-arm meta-analysis was therefore performed only on patients undergoing contralateral OIH repair. Data were synthesized with random-effects models for dichotomous outcomes. Continuous variables were pooled using inverse-variance methods. Weighted pooled estimates were calculated for baseline characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five retrospective cohort studies published between 2018 and 2025 were included, comprising 4,485 total patients, of whom 873 (19.5%) had occult inguinal hernias identified intraoperatively and subsequently repaired. The majority of repairs were performed using laparoscopy, with robotic approach reported in two studies. Mean patient age was 52.6 ± 14.0 years, mean BMI was 23.4 ± 3.9 kg/m², and > 90% of patients were male. Operative time ranged from 90.3 ± 30.9 to 132 ± 44.1 min, with a pooled mean of 116.9 min (95% CI 59.6-174.2) under a random-effects model (I² = 97.2%). Overall postoperative complications were reported in four studies, totaling 39 events among 819 patients (4.7%), with a pooled complication rate of 13% (95% CI 6-26%; I² = 31%). Surgical site infections (SSI) were rare, with 4 events among 873 patients (0.4%), corresponding to a pooled SSI rate of 1% (95% CI 1-2%; I² = 0%). Surgical site occurrences (SSO) were reported in 32 of 819 patients (3.6%), with a pooled rate of 12% (95% CI 4-29%; I² = 46.7%). Recurrence was reported in one study, with 9 cases (2.2%) during a mean follow-up of 30 months, and no reoperations or mortality were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Occult inguinal hernias are identified in approximately one in five patients undergoing minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair. Repair of these defects during TAPP appears safe, with low surgical site infection rates, low complication rates, and no reported mortality or reoperation across available studies. Although contralateral repair may modestly increase operative time and short-term postoperative burden, it may reduce the likelihood of future symptomatic hernia development and the need for a second operation. Substantial heterogeneity and limited long-term recurrence data highlight the need for prospective studies to better define the role of routine contralateral exploration and repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hernia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-026-03773-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Occult inguinal hernias (OIH) are frequently detected during laparoscopic repair of unilateral inguinal hernias due to direct visualization of the contralateral groin. However, the optimal management of these asymptomatic defects remains debated. This systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and postoperative outcomes of contralateral OIH repaired during transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched from inception to February 2026 for studies including adult patients undergoing TAPP repair with intraoperative identification of contralateral OIH. Due to heterogeneous reporting and inconsistent measures of dispersion, comparative meta-analysis was not feasible. A single-arm meta-analysis was therefore performed only on patients undergoing contralateral OIH repair. Data were synthesized with random-effects models for dichotomous outcomes. Continuous variables were pooled using inverse-variance methods. Weighted pooled estimates were calculated for baseline characteristics.

Results: Five retrospective cohort studies published between 2018 and 2025 were included, comprising 4,485 total patients, of whom 873 (19.5%) had occult inguinal hernias identified intraoperatively and subsequently repaired. The majority of repairs were performed using laparoscopy, with robotic approach reported in two studies. Mean patient age was 52.6 ± 14.0 years, mean BMI was 23.4 ± 3.9 kg/m², and > 90% of patients were male. Operative time ranged from 90.3 ± 30.9 to 132 ± 44.1 min, with a pooled mean of 116.9 min (95% CI 59.6-174.2) under a random-effects model (I² = 97.2%). Overall postoperative complications were reported in four studies, totaling 39 events among 819 patients (4.7%), with a pooled complication rate of 13% (95% CI 6-26%; I² = 31%). Surgical site infections (SSI) were rare, with 4 events among 873 patients (0.4%), corresponding to a pooled SSI rate of 1% (95% CI 1-2%; I² = 0%). Surgical site occurrences (SSO) were reported in 32 of 819 patients (3.6%), with a pooled rate of 12% (95% CI 4-29%; I² = 46.7%). Recurrence was reported in one study, with 9 cases (2.2%) during a mean follow-up of 30 months, and no reoperations or mortality were reported.

Conclusion: Occult inguinal hernias are identified in approximately one in five patients undergoing minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair. Repair of these defects during TAPP appears safe, with low surgical site infection rates, low complication rates, and no reported mortality or reoperation across available studies. Although contralateral repair may modestly increase operative time and short-term postoperative burden, it may reduce the likelihood of future symptomatic hernia development and the need for a second operation. Substantial heterogeneity and limited long-term recurrence data highlight the need for prospective studies to better define the role of routine contralateral exploration and repair.

单侧TAPP时隐蔽性对侧腹股沟疝是否需要修复?系统回顾和单臂荟萃分析。
目的:腹腔镜下单侧腹股沟疝修补术中,由于对侧腹股沟的直接可见,极易发现隐性腹股沟疝(OIH)。然而,这些无症状的缺陷的最佳管理仍然存在争议。本系统综述和单臂荟萃分析旨在评估经腹腹膜前(TAPP)修复对侧OIH的临床特征和术后结果。方法:按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价。检索PubMed, Embase和Scopus从成立到2026年2月的研究,包括接受TAPP修复术中识别对侧OIH的成年患者。由于异质报告和不一致的测量分散,比较荟萃分析是不可行的。因此,单臂荟萃分析仅对接受对侧OIH修复的患者进行。采用随机效应模型对二分类结果进行综合。使用反方差方法合并连续变量。对基线特征进行加权汇总估计。结果:纳入2018 - 2025年间发表的5项回顾性队列研究,共4485例患者,其中873例(19.5%)术中发现并随后修复了腹股沟隐性疝。大多数修复是通过腹腔镜进行的,有两项研究报道了机器人方法。患者平均年龄52.6±14.0岁,平均BMI为23.4±3.9 kg/m²,> 90%为男性。随机效应模型(I²= 97.2%)下,手术时间90.3±30.9 ~ 132±44.1 min,合并平均116.9 min (95% CI 59.6-174.2)。4项研究报告了总体术后并发症,819例患者共发生39例事件(4.7%),合并并发症发生率为13% (95% CI 6-26%; I²= 31%)。手术部位感染(SSI)很少见,873例患者中有4例(0.4%)发生手术部位感染,相应的合并SSI发生率为1% (95% CI 1-2%; I²= 0%)。819例患者中有32例(3.6%)报告了手术部位发生(SSO),合并发生率为12% (95% CI 4-29%; I²= 46.7%)。一项研究报告复发,9例(2.2%),平均随访30个月,无再手术或死亡报告。结论:隐性腹股沟疝在接受微创腹股沟疝修补术的患者中约占五分之一。在TAPP中修复这些缺陷是安全的,手术部位感染率低,并发症发生率低,在现有研究中没有死亡或再手术的报道。虽然对侧修复可能会适度增加手术时间和短期术后负担,但它可以减少未来症状性疝发展的可能性和第二次手术的需要。大量的异质性和有限的长期复发数据突出了前瞻性研究的必要性,以更好地定义常规对侧探查和修复的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hernia
Hernia SURGERY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
26.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hernia was founded in 1997 by Jean P. Chevrel with the purpose of promoting clinical studies and basic research as they apply to groin hernias and the abdominal wall . Since that time, a true revolution in the field of hernia studies has transformed the field from a ”simple” disease to one that is very specialized. While the majority of surgeries for primary inguinal and abdominal wall hernia are performed in hospitals worldwide, complex situations such as multi recurrences, complications, abdominal wall reconstructions and others are being studied and treated in specialist centers. As a result, major institutions and societies are creating specific parameters and criteria to better address the complexities of hernia surgery. Hernia is a journal written by surgeons who have made abdominal wall surgery their specific field of interest, but we will consider publishing content from any surgeon who wishes to improve the science of this field. The Journal aims to ensure that hernia surgery is safer and easier for surgeons as well as patients, and provides a forum to all surgeons in the exchange of new ideas, results, and important research that is the basis of professional activity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书