{"title":"Randomized controlled trials confirm the efficacy of psychological interventions and medications: Commentary on Jobes and Barnett (2025).","authors":"Freddy A Paniagua","doi":"10.1037/amp0001596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Jobes and Barnett (see record 2024-78987-001) decided to emphasize and recommend only psychological interventions (e.g., dialectical behavior therapy) in the clinical treatment for suicidal risk and behavior. Such interventions have been, in fact, proven effective in research emphasizing randomized controlled trials. Jobes and Barnett, however, decided not to include a section dealing with medications because they concluded that, with some exceptions (e.g., clozapine), the majority of medications have \"little to no evidence\" in randomized controlled trials. The article by Jobes and Barnett not only appears to be unintentionally biased in favor of only recommending psychological interventions, but it also appears clinically unsound to advise clinicians to de-emphasize medications in the present clinical context. The core message in the article (emphasis on psychological interventions, but not on medications) does not appear in accord with the American Psychological Association RxP Designation Committee with the mission to review and approve programs in prescriptive authority for psychologists nor with the wide range of medications with evidenced clinical benefits derived from randomized controlled trials funded by the National Institutes of Health and approved for marketing by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":"81 5","pages":"716-717"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001596","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Jobes and Barnett (see record 2024-78987-001) decided to emphasize and recommend only psychological interventions (e.g., dialectical behavior therapy) in the clinical treatment for suicidal risk and behavior. Such interventions have been, in fact, proven effective in research emphasizing randomized controlled trials. Jobes and Barnett, however, decided not to include a section dealing with medications because they concluded that, with some exceptions (e.g., clozapine), the majority of medications have "little to no evidence" in randomized controlled trials. The article by Jobes and Barnett not only appears to be unintentionally biased in favor of only recommending psychological interventions, but it also appears clinically unsound to advise clinicians to de-emphasize medications in the present clinical context. The core message in the article (emphasis on psychological interventions, but not on medications) does not appear in accord with the American Psychological Association RxP Designation Committee with the mission to review and approve programs in prescriptive authority for psychologists nor with the wide range of medications with evidenced clinical benefits derived from randomized controlled trials funded by the National Institutes of Health and approved for marketing by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Established in 1946, American Psychologist® is the flagship peer-reviewed scholarly journal of the American Psychological Association. It publishes high-impact papers of broad interest, including empirical reports, meta-analyses, and scholarly reviews, covering psychological science, practice, education, and policy. Articles often address issues of national and international significance within the field of psychology and its relationship to society. Published in an accessible style, contributions in American Psychologist are designed to be understood by both psychologists and the general public.