Household Labour During the Workday in Remote Work Contexts. Who Integrates It, and Why?

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Psychologica Belgica Pub Date : 2026-07-01 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.5334/pb.1477
Nathan Pudles, Marine Willeput, Sabine Pohl, Catherine Hellemans
{"title":"Household Labour During the Workday in Remote Work Contexts. Who Integrates It, and Why?","authors":"Nathan Pudles, Marine Willeput, Sabine Pohl, Catherine Hellemans","doi":"10.5334/pb.1477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Remote work is often presented as a means to balance out work and family domains, by giving the ability to integrate the two domains. Using border theory and social role theory as a framework, the present study aims to uncover the relationships of autonomy, job demands, work engagement, and the involvement with domestic tasks, with doing household labour during the workday (HLW), and how these relationships may differ depending on gender. The study was conducted among a sample of 1309 workers (65.77% women), who worked remotely at least once a week. Hypotheses were tested with a logistic regression and fractional polynomials. Results were in contradiction with the hypothesized relationships. Job demands and work engagement increased the probability of doing HLW. Autonomy decreased the probability of doing HLW. Involvement in domestic tasks was non-linearly associated with HLW. Specifically, workers who had to deal with domestic tasks mostly by themselves were more likely to resort to HLW, whereas others were less likely to do so. The relationships of autonomy, job demands, work engagement and IDT with HLW did not differ depending on gender.</p>","PeriodicalId":46662,"journal":{"name":"Psychologica Belgica","volume":"66 1","pages":"81-97"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13330990/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.1477","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Remote work is often presented as a means to balance out work and family domains, by giving the ability to integrate the two domains. Using border theory and social role theory as a framework, the present study aims to uncover the relationships of autonomy, job demands, work engagement, and the involvement with domestic tasks, with doing household labour during the workday (HLW), and how these relationships may differ depending on gender. The study was conducted among a sample of 1309 workers (65.77% women), who worked remotely at least once a week. Hypotheses were tested with a logistic regression and fractional polynomials. Results were in contradiction with the hypothesized relationships. Job demands and work engagement increased the probability of doing HLW. Autonomy decreased the probability of doing HLW. Involvement in domestic tasks was non-linearly associated with HLW. Specifically, workers who had to deal with domestic tasks mostly by themselves were more likely to resort to HLW, whereas others were less likely to do so. The relationships of autonomy, job demands, work engagement and IDT with HLW did not differ depending on gender.

远程工作环境下工作日的家务劳动。谁来整合它,为什么?
远程工作通常被认为是平衡工作和家庭领域的一种手段,它提供了将这两个领域整合在一起的能力。本研究以边界理论和社会角色理论为框架,旨在揭示自主性、工作需求、工作投入和参与家务、在工作日做家务(HLW)之间的关系,以及这些关系如何因性别而异。这项研究是在1309名每周至少远程工作一次的员工中进行的,其中65.77%是女性。用逻辑回归和分数阶多项式检验假设。结果与假设的关系相矛盾。工作需求和工作投入增加了高绩效工作的可能性。自主性降低了做HLW的概率。参与家务劳动与高幸福感呈非线性相关。具体来说,那些不得不独自处理家务的工人更有可能求助于高福利,而其他人则不太可能这样做。自主性、工作要求、工作投入、IDT与高绩效之间的关系不存在性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychologica Belgica
Psychologica Belgica PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书