Interprofessional Education Between Undergraduate Medical and Midwifery Students: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Nermin Abulibda, Shukrat O Salisu-Olatunji, Clare L Gillies, Lisa Jesson, Kerri Eilertsen-Feeney, Jonathan Corne, Jayne E Marshall, Keith Nockels, Elizabeth Susan Anderson, Jeremy Howick
{"title":"Interprofessional Education Between Undergraduate Medical and Midwifery Students: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.","authors":"Nermin Abulibda, Shukrat O Salisu-Olatunji, Clare L Gillies, Lisa Jesson, Kerri Eilertsen-Feeney, Jonathan Corne, Jayne E Marshall, Keith Nockels, Elizabeth Susan Anderson, Jeremy Howick","doi":"10.1177/23821205261455974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Collaboration between doctors and midwives is critical for safe healthcare, and interprofessional education (IPE) can help ensure this. Despite emphasis on IPE, evidence on interventions specifically targeting medical and midwifery students has not been systematically synthesized. This review examined the effectiveness of IPE interventions between these professional groups and explored their educational experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, Maternity and Infant Care, and PsycINFO were searched for studies (2015-2025) involving interventions targeting interprofessional communication between undergraduate medical and midwifery students. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies were included. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted, and appraised studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (2018). Quantitative results were narratively synthesized and qualitative data underwent thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies (1,399 participants; eight countries) met inclusion criteria: five quantitative, six qualitative, and five mixed-methods studies. Interventions included simulation (most common), problem- and case-based learning, community placements, and anatomy sessions, lasting 3 hours to 3 years, delivered in-person, online, or hybrid. Quantitative findings demonstrated improvements across all six IPE domains (teamwork, roles/responsibilities, communication, learning/reflection, patient-centeredness, ethics/attitudes) with small to moderate effect sizes (standardized mean differences: 0.04-0.50). Validated instruments showed gains in collaborative attitudes, role understanding, and interprofessional skills. Qualitative synthesis revealed two main themes: facilitators of effective IPE, including enhanced collaborative learning, identity negotiation, experiential learning, and communication development, and implementation barriers such as hierarchies, scheduling, role confusion, and online delivery challenges.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This first systematic review of IPE interventions between medical and midwifery students demonstrates that structured simulation-based IPE improves collaborative competencies. Effectiveness depends on addressing professional hierarchies, and careful curriculum integration. Early IPE implementation can foster collaboration, and reduce communication-related harm in maternal care.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD420251070277.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"13 ","pages":"23821205261455974"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13329001/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205261455974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Collaboration between doctors and midwives is critical for safe healthcare, and interprofessional education (IPE) can help ensure this. Despite emphasis on IPE, evidence on interventions specifically targeting medical and midwifery students has not been systematically synthesized. This review examined the effectiveness of IPE interventions between these professional groups and explored their educational experiences.

Methods: MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, Maternity and Infant Care, and PsycINFO were searched for studies (2015-2025) involving interventions targeting interprofessional communication between undergraduate medical and midwifery students. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies were included. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted, and appraised studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (2018). Quantitative results were narratively synthesized and qualitative data underwent thematic analysis.

Results: Sixteen studies (1,399 participants; eight countries) met inclusion criteria: five quantitative, six qualitative, and five mixed-methods studies. Interventions included simulation (most common), problem- and case-based learning, community placements, and anatomy sessions, lasting 3 hours to 3 years, delivered in-person, online, or hybrid. Quantitative findings demonstrated improvements across all six IPE domains (teamwork, roles/responsibilities, communication, learning/reflection, patient-centeredness, ethics/attitudes) with small to moderate effect sizes (standardized mean differences: 0.04-0.50). Validated instruments showed gains in collaborative attitudes, role understanding, and interprofessional skills. Qualitative synthesis revealed two main themes: facilitators of effective IPE, including enhanced collaborative learning, identity negotiation, experiential learning, and communication development, and implementation barriers such as hierarchies, scheduling, role confusion, and online delivery challenges.

Discussion: This first systematic review of IPE interventions between medical and midwifery students demonstrates that structured simulation-based IPE improves collaborative competencies. Effectiveness depends on addressing professional hierarchies, and careful curriculum integration. Early IPE implementation can foster collaboration, and reduce communication-related harm in maternal care.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD420251070277.

医学和助产学本科学生的跨专业教育:一项混合方法的系统评价。
背景:医生和助产士之间的合作对安全医疗保健至关重要,跨专业教育(IPE)可以帮助确保这一点。尽管强调IPE,但专门针对医学和助产学学生的干预措施的证据尚未系统地综合。本文回顾了这些专业团体之间IPE干预的有效性,并探讨了他们的教育经验。方法:检索MEDLINE、Scopus、CINAHL、母婴护理和PsycINFO等相关研究(2015-2025),涉及针对医学与助产学本科学生跨专业交流的干预措施。包括定量、定性和混合方法研究。两位审稿人使用混合方法评估工具(2018)独立筛选、提取和评估研究。定量结果以叙述方式综合,定性数据进行专题分析。结果:16项研究(1399名参与者,8个国家)符合纳入标准:5项定量研究,6项定性研究和5项混合方法研究。干预措施包括模拟(最常见的)、基于问题和案例的学习、社区实习和解剖课程,持续3小时至3年,可亲自授课、在线授课或混合授课。定量研究结果显示,IPE在所有六个领域(团队合作、角色/责任、沟通、学习/反思、以患者为中心、道德/态度)都有改善,效果大小为小到中等(标准化平均差异:0.04-0.50)。经过验证的工具显示了在协作态度、角色理解和跨专业技能方面的收获。定性综合揭示了两个主要主题:有效IPE的促进因素,包括增强的协作学习、身份协商、体验式学习和沟通发展;实施障碍,如等级制度、日程安排、角色混淆和在线交付挑战。讨论:这是对医学和助产学学生之间的IPE干预的第一次系统回顾,表明基于结构化模拟的IPE提高了协作能力。有效性取决于解决专业等级和仔细的课程整合。早期实施公众健康教育可以促进合作,减少孕产妇保健中与沟通有关的危害。系统评价注册:PROSPERO CRD420251070277。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书