Construction of an ultrasound feature-based diagnostic model for predicting triple-negative breast cancer using 108 machine learning algorithm combinations.

IF 1.1 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science Pub Date : 2026-06-29 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.25259/JCIS_283_2025
Xin Zhang, Xiaomin Zhang, Shan Zhu, Ningxia Ao, Yali Cao, Guangfei Yang
{"title":"Construction of an ultrasound feature-based diagnostic model for predicting triple-negative breast cancer using 108 machine learning algorithm combinations.","authors":"Xin Zhang, Xiaomin Zhang, Shan Zhu, Ningxia Ao, Yali Cao, Guangfei Yang","doi":"10.25259/JCIS_283_2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer lacking estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor R expression. This study aimed to identify ultrasound features associated with TNBC and construct a robust diagnostic model using machine learning techniques.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 433 BC patients (47 TNBC and 386 non-TNBC) with complete clinical and ultrasound data were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified independent ultrasound predictors of TNBC. Subsequently, 108 combinations of feature selection methods and machine learning classifiers were systematically evaluated to identify the optimal diagnostic model. Model performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration plots in both training and validation cohorts. The ethical approval was obtained from the institutional review board, and the requirement for individual written informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariate analysis identified posterior acho, margins, calcification, and aspect ratio as independent predictors of TNBC (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Among all model combinations, the Stepwise Generalized Linear Model combined with Random Forest model achieved the best performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 1.000 in the training set and 0.913 in the validation set. Subgroup analysis revealed higher model accuracy in patients aged ≤50 years (AUC = 0.911) compared to those >50 years (AUC = 0.706). DCA and calibration plots indicated high clinical utility and excellent calibration performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Specific ultrasound features can effectively distinguish TNBC from non-TNBC. A machine learning-based diagnostic model that integrates multiple algorithmic combinations demonstrates strong generalizability and may serve as a valuable clinical tool, particularly for younger patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science","volume":"16 ","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13331217/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_283_2025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer lacking estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor R expression. This study aimed to identify ultrasound features associated with TNBC and construct a robust diagnostic model using machine learning techniques.

Material and methods: A total of 433 BC patients (47 TNBC and 386 non-TNBC) with complete clinical and ultrasound data were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified independent ultrasound predictors of TNBC. Subsequently, 108 combinations of feature selection methods and machine learning classifiers were systematically evaluated to identify the optimal diagnostic model. Model performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration plots in both training and validation cohorts. The ethical approval was obtained from the institutional review board, and the requirement for individual written informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Results: Multivariate analysis identified posterior acho, margins, calcification, and aspect ratio as independent predictors of TNBC (p < 0.05). Among all model combinations, the Stepwise Generalized Linear Model combined with Random Forest model achieved the best performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 1.000 in the training set and 0.913 in the validation set. Subgroup analysis revealed higher model accuracy in patients aged ≤50 years (AUC = 0.911) compared to those >50 years (AUC = 0.706). DCA and calibration plots indicated high clinical utility and excellent calibration performance.

Conclusion: Specific ultrasound features can effectively distinguish TNBC from non-TNBC. A machine learning-based diagnostic model that integrates multiple algorithmic combinations demonstrates strong generalizability and may serve as a valuable clinical tool, particularly for younger patients.

108种机器学习算法组合构建基于超声特征的三阴性乳腺癌预测诊断模型
目的:三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)是一种缺乏雌激素受体、孕激素受体和人表皮生长因子R表达的侵袭性乳腺癌亚型。本研究旨在识别与TNBC相关的超声特征,并使用机器学习技术构建稳健的诊断模型。材料与方法:回顾性分析433例BC患者(47例TNBC, 386例非TNBC)的临床及超声资料。单因素和多因素logistic回归分析确定了TNBC的独立超声预测因子。随后,系统评估了108种特征选择方法和机器学习分类器的组合,以确定最佳诊断模型。使用受试者工作特征曲线、决策曲线分析(DCA)以及训练和验证队列的校准图来评估模型的性能。获得了机构审查委员会的伦理批准,并且由于该研究的回顾性性质,放弃了个人书面知情同意的要求。结果:多变量分析发现后回声、边缘、钙化和纵横比是TNBC的独立预测因素(p < 0.05)。在所有模型组合中,逐步广义线性模型与随机森林模型的组合效果最好,训练集的曲线下面积(AUC)为1.000,验证集的AUC为0.913。亚组分析显示,年龄≤50岁的患者(AUC = 0.911)的模型准确率高于年龄≤50岁的患者(AUC = 0.706)。DCA和校正图具有较高的临床应用价值和良好的校正性能。结论:特异的超声特征可有效鉴别TNBC与非TNBC。基于机器学习的诊断模型集成了多种算法组合,具有很强的通用性,可以作为一种有价值的临床工具,特别是对年轻患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Imaging Science (JCIS) is an open access peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing high-quality articles in the field of Imaging Science. The journal aims to present Imaging Science and relevant clinical information in an understandable and useful format. The journal is owned and published by the Scientific Scholar. Audience Our audience includes Radiologists, Researchers, Clinicians, medical professionals and students. Review process JCIS has a highly rigorous peer-review process that makes sure that manuscripts are scientifically accurate, relevant, novel and important. Authors disclose all conflicts, affiliations and financial associations such that the published content is not biased.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书