Theory put into practice: probabilistic approach to propranolol as the cause of death.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Pirkko Kriikku, Paula Vauhkonen, Ilkka Ojanperä, Petteri Oura
{"title":"Theory put into practice: probabilistic approach to propranolol as the cause of death.","authors":"Pirkko Kriikku, Paula Vauhkonen, Ilkka Ojanperä, Petteri Oura","doi":"10.1093/jat/bkag059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Post-mortem forensic toxicology aims to assist in cause-of-death investigations, especially in suspected toxicity cases. Utilizing a large toxicology database derived from routine medico-legal autopsies, we tested a probabilistic approach in assessing the contribution of a toxicological finding to the underlying cause of death. In this retrospective study, theoretical general prior odds for a poisoning death were calculated for three different groups of cases based on the laboratory referral issued by the forensic pathologist. The groups were, in descending order according to the likelihood of poisoning: (i) suspected poisoning (N = 6356), (ii) exclusion of poisoning (N = 12 641), and (iii) for background information only (N = 15 018). Propranolol was selected as a model compound with 548 propranolol-positive cases in the database. First, the detected propranolol concentrations were divided into concentration ranges. Then, a likelihood ratio (LR) for each concentration range was calculated as the probability of observing a propranolol concentration within a certain concentration range given that propranolol poisoning was the cause of death, divided by the probability of observing a propranolol concentration within the same concentration range given that propranolol poisoning was not the cause of death. To showcase the practical applicability, posterior odds for fatal propranolol poisoning were derived using the odds form of Bayes' theorem (posterior odds = prior odds × LR) for a selection of propranolol-positive cases (N = 5) and compared with the cause of death recorded on the death certificate. In our dataset, the point estimate for LR exceeded 1 for propranolol concentrations ≥1.0 mg/L. The LR proved useful in assisting in the cause-of-death determination and making the interpretive process more systematic and transparent. Despite some limitations, this study added to the evidence of the usefulness of a probabilistic approach in assessing the relevance of a toxicology finding in autopsy cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":14905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkag059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Post-mortem forensic toxicology aims to assist in cause-of-death investigations, especially in suspected toxicity cases. Utilizing a large toxicology database derived from routine medico-legal autopsies, we tested a probabilistic approach in assessing the contribution of a toxicological finding to the underlying cause of death. In this retrospective study, theoretical general prior odds for a poisoning death were calculated for three different groups of cases based on the laboratory referral issued by the forensic pathologist. The groups were, in descending order according to the likelihood of poisoning: (i) suspected poisoning (N = 6356), (ii) exclusion of poisoning (N = 12 641), and (iii) for background information only (N = 15 018). Propranolol was selected as a model compound with 548 propranolol-positive cases in the database. First, the detected propranolol concentrations were divided into concentration ranges. Then, a likelihood ratio (LR) for each concentration range was calculated as the probability of observing a propranolol concentration within a certain concentration range given that propranolol poisoning was the cause of death, divided by the probability of observing a propranolol concentration within the same concentration range given that propranolol poisoning was not the cause of death. To showcase the practical applicability, posterior odds for fatal propranolol poisoning were derived using the odds form of Bayes' theorem (posterior odds = prior odds × LR) for a selection of propranolol-positive cases (N = 5) and compared with the cause of death recorded on the death certificate. In our dataset, the point estimate for LR exceeded 1 for propranolol concentrations ≥1.0 mg/L. The LR proved useful in assisting in the cause-of-death determination and making the interpretive process more systematic and transparent. Despite some limitations, this study added to the evidence of the usefulness of a probabilistic approach in assessing the relevance of a toxicology finding in autopsy cases.

理论付诸实践:普萘洛尔作为死因的概率方法。
死后法医毒理学的目的是协助死因调查,特别是在疑似中毒案件中。利用来自常规法医尸检的大型毒理学数据库,我们测试了一种概率方法来评估毒理学发现对潜在死亡原因的贡献。在这项回顾性研究中,根据法医病理学家出具的实验室转诊,计算了三组不同病例中中毒死亡的理论一般先验赔率。根据中毒可能性由高到低依次为:A)疑似中毒(N = 6356), B)排除中毒(N = 12 641), C)仅了解背景资料(N = 15 018)。选取548例普萘洛尔阳性病例作为模型化合物。首先,将检测到的心得安浓度划分为浓度范围。然后,计算每个浓度范围内的似然比(LR),即在某一浓度范围内观察到心得安中毒致死的概率,除以在同一浓度范围内观察到心得安中毒非致死的概率。为了展示该方法的实际适用性,我们选取了5例普萘洛尔阳性病例,采用贝叶斯定理的赔率形式(后验赔率=先验赔率x LR),得出了普萘洛尔致死性中毒的后验赔率,并与死亡证明上记录的死亡原因进行了比较。在我们的数据集中,当心得安浓度≥1.0 mg/L时,LR的点估计值超过1。事实证明,在协助确定死亡原因和使解释过程更加系统和透明方面,法律记录是有用的。尽管存在一些局限性,但本研究增加了概率方法在评估尸检病例毒理学发现相关性方面的有用性的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Analytical Toxicology (JAT) is an international toxicology journal devoted to the timely dissemination of scientific communications concerning potentially toxic substances and drug identification, isolation, and quantitation. Since its inception in 1977, the Journal of Analytical Toxicology has striven to present state-of-the-art techniques used in toxicology labs. The peer-review process provided by the distinguished members of the Editorial Advisory Board ensures the high-quality and integrity of articles published in the Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Timely presentation of the latest toxicology developments is ensured through Technical Notes, Case Reports, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书