Combined Ab-Interno Trabeculectomy and Trabecular Aspiration as a Simultaneous versus Sequential Addition to Phacoemulsification in Exfoliative Eyes.

IF 0.9 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Current Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2026-06-23 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.4103/joco.joco_226_25
David Kiessling, Alexandra Lappas, Thomas S Dietlein, Gernot F Roessler, Randolf A Widder
{"title":"Combined Ab-Interno Trabeculectomy and Trabecular Aspiration as a Simultaneous versus Sequential Addition to Phacoemulsification in Exfoliative Eyes.","authors":"David Kiessling, Alexandra Lappas, Thomas S Dietlein, Gernot F Roessler, Randolf A Widder","doi":"10.4103/joco.joco_226_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine differing outcomes among pseudophakic patients with exfoliation glaucoma who underwent combined trabectome surgery and trabecular aspiration and phakic patients treated by a triple procedure with additional phacoemulsification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study involved 75 eyes of 75 participants, of which 25 eyes received combined ab-interno trabeculectomy and trabecular aspiration (Trabectome + TA group), and 50 eyes underwent a triple procedure with additional phacoemulsification (triple group). The groups were matched at a 1:2 ratio, based on the following criteria: preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), maximum known preoperative IOP, preoperative medication score, cup/disc ratio, follow-up time, and age. Successful surgery was defined by three scores: IOP at longest follow-up <21 mmHg (Score A) or <18 mmHg (Score B), without re-surgery and an IOP reduction >20% or IOP ≤15 mmHg without re-surgery and an IOP reduction ≥40% (Score C).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The preoperative IOP was 23.7 ± 5 mmHg, respectively, and decreased to 15.2 ± 4 mmHg in the triple group, which is significantly lower than postoperative IOP in the Trabectome + TA group, being 18.6 ± 8 mmHg during an average follow-up period of 33.4 ± 26 months (<i>P</i> = 0.02). The success rate in the triple group was significantly higher than in the Trabectome + TA group, according to Score A (78% vs. 40%) and Score B (70% vs. 36%). When aiming at a lower target IOP (Score C), the success rates did not differ significantly (36% vs. 24%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cataract extraction, as a part of a triple procedure, seems to contribute to more effective IOP-lowering than trabectome surgery and trabecular aspiration alone in patients who underwent standalone phacoemulsification previously.</p>","PeriodicalId":15423,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","volume":"37 4","pages":"389-394"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13331293/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joco.joco_226_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine differing outcomes among pseudophakic patients with exfoliation glaucoma who underwent combined trabectome surgery and trabecular aspiration and phakic patients treated by a triple procedure with additional phacoemulsification.

Methods: This retrospective study involved 75 eyes of 75 participants, of which 25 eyes received combined ab-interno trabeculectomy and trabecular aspiration (Trabectome + TA group), and 50 eyes underwent a triple procedure with additional phacoemulsification (triple group). The groups were matched at a 1:2 ratio, based on the following criteria: preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), maximum known preoperative IOP, preoperative medication score, cup/disc ratio, follow-up time, and age. Successful surgery was defined by three scores: IOP at longest follow-up <21 mmHg (Score A) or <18 mmHg (Score B), without re-surgery and an IOP reduction >20% or IOP ≤15 mmHg without re-surgery and an IOP reduction ≥40% (Score C).

Results: The preoperative IOP was 23.7 ± 5 mmHg, respectively, and decreased to 15.2 ± 4 mmHg in the triple group, which is significantly lower than postoperative IOP in the Trabectome + TA group, being 18.6 ± 8 mmHg during an average follow-up period of 33.4 ± 26 months (P = 0.02). The success rate in the triple group was significantly higher than in the Trabectome + TA group, according to Score A (78% vs. 40%) and Score B (70% vs. 36%). When aiming at a lower target IOP (Score C), the success rates did not differ significantly (36% vs. 24%).

Conclusions: Cataract extraction, as a part of a triple procedure, seems to contribute to more effective IOP-lowering than trabectome surgery and trabecular aspiration alone in patients who underwent standalone phacoemulsification previously.

联合Ab-Interno小梁切除术和小梁抽吸术在剥脱性眼超声乳化术中的应用。
目的:确定假晶状体伴剥脱性青光眼患者联合小梁切除术和小梁抽吸治疗与晶状体患者联合三重手术加超声乳化治疗的不同结果。方法:回顾性研究75只眼,其中25只眼接受了联合小梁切除术和小梁抽吸术(小梁切除术+ TA组),50只眼接受了三联手术并附加超声乳化术(三联组)。根据术前眼压(IOP)、已知最大术前IOP、术前用药评分、杯盘比、随访时间、年龄,按1:2的比例进行分组匹配。手术成功由三个评分来定义:最长随访时IOP为20%或IOP≤15mmhg而无需再次手术,IOP降低≥40%(评分C)。结果:术前眼压分别为23.7±5 mmHg,三联组眼压降至15.2±4 mmHg,明显低于术后小梁组眼压18.6±8 mmHg,平均随访33.4±26个月(P = 0.02)。根据A评分(78%对40%)和B评分(70%对36%),三联组的成功率明显高于trabecome + TA组。当瞄准较低的目标IOP(评分C)时,成功率无显著差异(36% vs. 24%)。结论:白内障摘除,作为三联手术的一部分,似乎比小梁切除术和小梁吸除术更有效地降低了先前单独行超声乳化术的患者的眼压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
45
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Peer Review under the responsibility of Iranian Society of Ophthalmology Journal of Current Ophthalmology, the official publication of the Iranian Society of Ophthalmology, is a peer-reviewed, open-access, scientific journal that welcomes high quality original articles related to vision science and all fields of ophthalmology. Journal of Current Ophthalmology is the continuum of Iranian Journal of Ophthalmology published since 1969.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书