Stress Buffering Through Online Social Support Under Offline Constraints.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Juwon Hwang
{"title":"Stress Buffering Through Online Social Support Under Offline Constraints.","authors":"Juwon Hwang","doi":"10.1080/10810730.2026.2699882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stress-buffering theory explains how perceived social support mitigates the negative effects of stress but offers limited guidance on when this buffering function varies across social contexts. Integrating stress-buffering and social compensation perspectives, this study examines online social support as a context-dependent form of support whose buffering role depends on constraints on face-to-face supportive communication. Two constraints are examined: chronic health conditions, which limit individuals' capacity to engage in in-person supportive interaction, and limited offline support availability, which restricts access to reliable face-to-face support. Using a U.S. survey (<i>N</i> = 2,650), analyses show that perceived online social support moderates the association between stress and quality of life, such that higher perceived online support is associated with a weaker negative association between stress and quality of life. Importantly, this stress-buffering association was stronger among individuals managing multiple chronic health conditions. A directionally consistent but non-confirmatory pattern was observed among individuals reporting lower offline support availability.</p>","PeriodicalId":16026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2026.2699882","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stress-buffering theory explains how perceived social support mitigates the negative effects of stress but offers limited guidance on when this buffering function varies across social contexts. Integrating stress-buffering and social compensation perspectives, this study examines online social support as a context-dependent form of support whose buffering role depends on constraints on face-to-face supportive communication. Two constraints are examined: chronic health conditions, which limit individuals' capacity to engage in in-person supportive interaction, and limited offline support availability, which restricts access to reliable face-to-face support. Using a U.S. survey (N = 2,650), analyses show that perceived online social support moderates the association between stress and quality of life, such that higher perceived online support is associated with a weaker negative association between stress and quality of life. Importantly, this stress-buffering association was stronger among individuals managing multiple chronic health conditions. A directionally consistent but non-confirmatory pattern was observed among individuals reporting lower offline support availability.

线下约束下的在线社会支持对压力的缓冲作用
压力缓冲理论解释了感知到的社会支持如何减轻压力的负面影响,但对于这种缓冲功能在不同社会背景下的变化提供了有限的指导。结合压力缓冲和社会补偿的观点,本研究考察了网络社会支持作为一种情境依赖的支持形式,其缓冲作用取决于对面对面支持沟通的约束。研究考察了两个制约因素:慢性健康状况,这限制了个人参与面对面支持互动的能力;有限的线下支持,这限制了获得可靠的面对面支持的机会。利用美国的一项调查(N = 2650),分析表明,感知到的网络社会支持调节了压力和生活质量之间的关系,因此,更高的感知到的网络支持与压力和生活质量之间的负相关关系较弱。重要的是,这种压力缓冲关联在管理多种慢性健康状况的个体中更强。在报告较低的离线支持可用性的个体中观察到方向一致但非证实的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives is the leading journal covering the full breadth of a field that focuses on the communication of health information globally. Articles feature research on: • Developments in the field of health communication; • New media, m-health and interactive health communication; • Health Literacy; • Social marketing; • Global Health; • Shared decision making and ethics; • Interpersonal and mass media communication; • Advances in health diplomacy, psychology, government, policy and education; • Government, civil society and multi-stakeholder initiatives; • Public Private partnerships and • Public Health campaigns. Global in scope, the journal seeks to advance a synergistic relationship between research and practical information. With a focus on promoting the health literacy of the individual, caregiver, provider, community, and those in the health policy, the journal presents research, progress in areas of technology and public health, ethics, politics and policy, and the application of health communication principles. The journal is selective with the highest quality social scientific research including qualitative and quantitative studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书