Popular Attitudes Toward Vaccination During the Initial COVID-19 Vaccination Rollout (December 2020-May 2021): A Social Media Analysis.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Yavuz Selim Balcioğlu, Özlem Karatana Çaliş, Erkut Altindağ
{"title":"Popular Attitudes Toward Vaccination During the Initial COVID-19 Vaccination Rollout (December 2020-May 2021): A Social Media Analysis.","authors":"Yavuz Selim Balcioğlu, Özlem Karatana Çaliş, Erkut Altindağ","doi":"10.1080/10810730.2026.2699886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic triggered global vaccination campaigns while simultaneously fueling misinformation and vaccine hesitancy. This study analyzed 77,171 English-language tweets related to vaccination collected between December 2020 and May 2021 to examine how attitudes toward vaccination evolved during this critical period. Using a mixed-methods approach combining sentiment analysis, thematic classification, and demographic analysis, the study identified trends that may influence vaccination acceptance beyond COVID-19. Results showed a decline in positive sentiment (18.3% to 10.9%) and an increase in negative sentiment (9.1% to 14.6%), with a critical inflection point in February 2021. Trust in institutions was the most frequently discussed theme, but its initially positive sentiment decreased substantially by May 2021. Negative sentiment toward childhood vaccination rose sharply from 6.7% to 43.3% by April 2021. Users with larger follower counts contributed more negative content, amplifying skepticism. Eight misinformation categories were identified, including claims about DNA alteration, government control, and 5 G connectivity. Interpreted through the Health Belief Model, Social Amplification of Risk Framework, and Institutional Trust Theory, the findings suggest that vaccine distrust may extend to routine immunizations and highlight the need for targeted communication strategies to rebuild public trust.</p>","PeriodicalId":16026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2026.2699886","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic triggered global vaccination campaigns while simultaneously fueling misinformation and vaccine hesitancy. This study analyzed 77,171 English-language tweets related to vaccination collected between December 2020 and May 2021 to examine how attitudes toward vaccination evolved during this critical period. Using a mixed-methods approach combining sentiment analysis, thematic classification, and demographic analysis, the study identified trends that may influence vaccination acceptance beyond COVID-19. Results showed a decline in positive sentiment (18.3% to 10.9%) and an increase in negative sentiment (9.1% to 14.6%), with a critical inflection point in February 2021. Trust in institutions was the most frequently discussed theme, but its initially positive sentiment decreased substantially by May 2021. Negative sentiment toward childhood vaccination rose sharply from 6.7% to 43.3% by April 2021. Users with larger follower counts contributed more negative content, amplifying skepticism. Eight misinformation categories were identified, including claims about DNA alteration, government control, and 5 G connectivity. Interpreted through the Health Belief Model, Social Amplification of Risk Framework, and Institutional Trust Theory, the findings suggest that vaccine distrust may extend to routine immunizations and highlight the need for targeted communication strategies to rebuild public trust.

在COVID-19疫苗接种初期(2020年12月- 2021年5月),公众对疫苗接种的态度:一项社交媒体分析。
COVID-19大流行引发了全球疫苗接种运动,同时助长了错误信息和疫苗犹豫。这项研究分析了2020年12月至2021年5月期间收集的77171条与疫苗接种相关的英语推文,以研究在这一关键时期人们对疫苗接种的态度是如何演变的。该研究采用情感分析、主题分类和人口统计分析相结合的混合方法,确定了除COVID-19之外可能影响疫苗接种接受度的趋势。结果显示,积极情绪下降(18.3%→10.9%),消极情绪上升(9.1%→14.6%),并在2021年2月出现关键拐点。对机构的信任是最常讨论的主题,但到2021年5月,其最初的积极情绪大幅下降。到2021年4月,对儿童接种疫苗的负面情绪从6.7%急剧上升至43.3%。关注者数量较多的用户发布了更多负面内容,放大了怀疑论。他们确定了8个错误信息类别,包括关于DNA改变、政府控制和5g连接的说法。通过健康信念模型、风险社会放大框架和制度信任理论的解释,研究结果表明,疫苗不信任可能会扩展到常规免疫接种,并强调需要有针对性的沟通策略来重建公众信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives is the leading journal covering the full breadth of a field that focuses on the communication of health information globally. Articles feature research on: • Developments in the field of health communication; • New media, m-health and interactive health communication; • Health Literacy; • Social marketing; • Global Health; • Shared decision making and ethics; • Interpersonal and mass media communication; • Advances in health diplomacy, psychology, government, policy and education; • Government, civil society and multi-stakeholder initiatives; • Public Private partnerships and • Public Health campaigns. Global in scope, the journal seeks to advance a synergistic relationship between research and practical information. With a focus on promoting the health literacy of the individual, caregiver, provider, community, and those in the health policy, the journal presents research, progress in areas of technology and public health, ethics, politics and policy, and the application of health communication principles. The journal is selective with the highest quality social scientific research including qualitative and quantitative studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书