Comparison of Corneal Surface Symmetry and Optical Aberrations after Conventional versus Brassiere Suture Technique in Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty.

IF 0.9 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Current Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2026-06-23 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.4103/joco.joco_206_25
Elmas Yüksel Sükün, Sibel Sipahioğlu
{"title":"Comparison of Corneal Surface Symmetry and Optical Aberrations after Conventional versus Brassiere Suture Technique in Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty.","authors":"Elmas Yüksel Sükün, Sibel Sipahioğlu","doi":"10.4103/joco.joco_206_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the effects of conventional blepharoplasty and the brassiere suture technique on corneal topography and optical aberrations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective comparative study included right eye data from 140 patients who underwent upper eyelid blepharoplasty for dermatochalasis between 2023 and 2025. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical technique: conventional blepharoplasty (<i>n</i> = 80) and brassiere suture technique (<i>n</i> = 60). Corneal topography and aberrometry were assessed preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively using the Sirius topography system. Pre- and postoperative changes in 40 parameters were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and intergroup comparisons of delta values (Δ) were performed using the Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Neither technique resulted in significant changes in most corneal topography or aberrometry parameters (<i>P</i> > 0.05). However, the brassiere suture group demonstrated significant improvements in the superior irregularity ratio (ΔSIR) and total symmetry index (ΔTSI) (<i>P</i> = 0.006 and <i>P</i> = 0.018, respectively). In addition, a significant reduction was observed in vertical trefoil aberration at 6 mm (ΔTrefoil vertical, <i>P</i> = 0.031). No significant intergroup differences were found in other aberration or keratometric parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The brassiere suture technique demonstrated statistically significant improvements in corneal symmetry (SIR) and regularity (TSI) compared to conventional blepharoplasty. These findings indicate that the surgical approach may influence corneal surface characteristics. Further prospective studies are warranted to assess the clinical relevance of these optical changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15423,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","volume":"37 4","pages":"413-420"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13331314/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joco.joco_206_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effects of conventional blepharoplasty and the brassiere suture technique on corneal topography and optical aberrations.

Methods: This retrospective comparative study included right eye data from 140 patients who underwent upper eyelid blepharoplasty for dermatochalasis between 2023 and 2025. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical technique: conventional blepharoplasty (n = 80) and brassiere suture technique (n = 60). Corneal topography and aberrometry were assessed preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively using the Sirius topography system. Pre- and postoperative changes in 40 parameters were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and intergroup comparisons of delta values (Δ) were performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test.

Results: Neither technique resulted in significant changes in most corneal topography or aberrometry parameters (P > 0.05). However, the brassiere suture group demonstrated significant improvements in the superior irregularity ratio (ΔSIR) and total symmetry index (ΔTSI) (P = 0.006 and P = 0.018, respectively). In addition, a significant reduction was observed in vertical trefoil aberration at 6 mm (ΔTrefoil vertical, P = 0.031). No significant intergroup differences were found in other aberration or keratometric parameters.

Conclusions: The brassiere suture technique demonstrated statistically significant improvements in corneal symmetry (SIR) and regularity (TSI) compared to conventional blepharoplasty. These findings indicate that the surgical approach may influence corneal surface characteristics. Further prospective studies are warranted to assess the clinical relevance of these optical changes.

上睑成形术常规与胸罩缝合术后角膜表面对称性及光学像差的比较。
目的:比较常规眼睑成形术与胸罩缝合术对角膜地形图和光学像差的影响。方法:本回顾性比较研究纳入了2023年至2025年间因皮肤松弛而接受上眼睑成形术的140例患者的右眼数据。根据手术方法将患者分为两组:常规眼睑成形术组(80例)和胸罩缝合组(60例)。术前和术后3个月使用Sirius地形图系统评估角膜地形图和像差。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验分析40个参数的术前和术后变化,并使用Mann-Whitney u检验进行组间Δ值比较(Δ)。结果:两种方法对角膜地形图和像差测量参数的影响均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。然而,胸罩缝合组在优越不均匀率(ΔSIR)和总对称指数(ΔTSI)方面有显著改善(P = 0.006和P = 0.018)。此外,垂直三叶像差在6 mm处显著降低(ΔTrefoil垂直,P = 0.031)。其他像差或角膜测量参数组间无显著差异。结论:与传统的眼睑成形术相比,胸罩缝合技术在角膜对称性(SIR)和规律性(TSI)方面有统计学意义的改善。这些结果表明手术入路可能会影响角膜表面特征。进一步的前瞻性研究需要评估这些光学变化的临床相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
45
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Peer Review under the responsibility of Iranian Society of Ophthalmology Journal of Current Ophthalmology, the official publication of the Iranian Society of Ophthalmology, is a peer-reviewed, open-access, scientific journal that welcomes high quality original articles related to vision science and all fields of ophthalmology. Journal of Current Ophthalmology is the continuum of Iranian Journal of Ophthalmology published since 1969.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书