Comparison of subtrochanteric varus osteotomy and shelf acetabuloplasty in fragmentation-stage (Waldenström stage II) Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease: a prospective randomized study.
Hazem Abd El-Hameed, Karim Ibrahim Okasha, Mohamed Mahmoud Hegazy, Hassan Magdy El-Barbary, Mohamed Youness Ali, Ahmed Morsy Ahmed
{"title":"Comparison of subtrochanteric varus osteotomy and shelf acetabuloplasty in fragmentation-stage (Waldenström stage II) Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease: a prospective randomized study.","authors":"Hazem Abd El-Hameed, Karim Ibrahim Okasha, Mohamed Mahmoud Hegazy, Hassan Magdy El-Barbary, Mohamed Youness Ali, Ahmed Morsy Ahmed","doi":"10.1007/s00264-026-06932-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Optimal containment in fragmentation stage (Waldenström stage II) of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD) remains controversial. This study compared the clinical and radiographic outcomes of subtrochanteric femoral varus osteotomy (STVO) versus shelf acetabuloplasty in children with fragmentation stage (Waldenström stage II) of LCPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective randomized clinical trial included 32 children (32 hips) with LCPD in fragmentation stage (Waldenström stage II), treated between April 2022 and June 2024. Patients were randomized into two groups: STVO (n = 16) and shelf acetabuloplasty (n = 16). The primary outcome was clinical outcome at final follow-up assessed using the modified Sundt criteria. Secondary outcomes included containment radiographic parameters, interim femoral head sphericity using the Stulberg classification, leg length discrepancy (LLD), and complications. Mean follow-up duration was 25.1 ± 1.8 months in the STVO group and 26.1 ± 2.0 months in the shelf acetabuloplasty group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both procedures resulted in significant clinical and radiographic improvement. Good clinical outcomes were achieved in 81.2% of hips in each group, with no poor outcomes. At final follow-up, the mean center-edge angle (CEA) increased significantly in both groups, reflecting improved lateral femoral head coverage. Sharp's angle decreased significantly in both groups, indicating improved acetabular morphology. Both groups demonstrated a significant reduction in the medial joint space ratio, indicating improved containment. After adjustment for baseline values using ANCOVA, no statistically significant between-group differences were identified. Among hips that had reached the remodeling stage, exploratory analysis suggested a higher proportion of favorable interim Stulberg outcomes (I-II) in the STVO group; however, interpretation is limited by the small subgroup size, differential progression to remodeling, and the use of a classification system originally intended for assessment at skeletal maturity. Clinically significant LLD (> 1.5 cm) occurred in 43.8% of STVO patients and in none of the shelf group. Complications were minor and comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>STVO and shelf acetabuloplasty yield comparable short- to mid-term clinical outcomes in fragmentation stage (Waldenström stage II) of LCPD. However, STVO was associated with a substantially higher incidence of clinically significant leg length discrepancy, whereas shelf acetabuloplasty preserved limb length. Exploratory analyses suggested a possible advantage of STVO regarding interim femoral head sphericity. These findings should not be interpreted as evidence of superiority, and require confirmation at skeletal maturity.</p>","PeriodicalId":14450,"journal":{"name":"International Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":"2543-2557"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-026-06932-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Optimal containment in fragmentation stage (Waldenström stage II) of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD) remains controversial. This study compared the clinical and radiographic outcomes of subtrochanteric femoral varus osteotomy (STVO) versus shelf acetabuloplasty in children with fragmentation stage (Waldenström stage II) of LCPD.
Methods: This prospective randomized clinical trial included 32 children (32 hips) with LCPD in fragmentation stage (Waldenström stage II), treated between April 2022 and June 2024. Patients were randomized into two groups: STVO (n = 16) and shelf acetabuloplasty (n = 16). The primary outcome was clinical outcome at final follow-up assessed using the modified Sundt criteria. Secondary outcomes included containment radiographic parameters, interim femoral head sphericity using the Stulberg classification, leg length discrepancy (LLD), and complications. Mean follow-up duration was 25.1 ± 1.8 months in the STVO group and 26.1 ± 2.0 months in the shelf acetabuloplasty group.
Results: Both procedures resulted in significant clinical and radiographic improvement. Good clinical outcomes were achieved in 81.2% of hips in each group, with no poor outcomes. At final follow-up, the mean center-edge angle (CEA) increased significantly in both groups, reflecting improved lateral femoral head coverage. Sharp's angle decreased significantly in both groups, indicating improved acetabular morphology. Both groups demonstrated a significant reduction in the medial joint space ratio, indicating improved containment. After adjustment for baseline values using ANCOVA, no statistically significant between-group differences were identified. Among hips that had reached the remodeling stage, exploratory analysis suggested a higher proportion of favorable interim Stulberg outcomes (I-II) in the STVO group; however, interpretation is limited by the small subgroup size, differential progression to remodeling, and the use of a classification system originally intended for assessment at skeletal maturity. Clinically significant LLD (> 1.5 cm) occurred in 43.8% of STVO patients and in none of the shelf group. Complications were minor and comparable.
Conclusion: STVO and shelf acetabuloplasty yield comparable short- to mid-term clinical outcomes in fragmentation stage (Waldenström stage II) of LCPD. However, STVO was associated with a substantially higher incidence of clinically significant leg length discrepancy, whereas shelf acetabuloplasty preserved limb length. Exploratory analyses suggested a possible advantage of STVO regarding interim femoral head sphericity. These findings should not be interpreted as evidence of superiority, and require confirmation at skeletal maturity.
期刊介绍:
International Orthopaedics, the Official Journal of the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) , publishes original papers from all over the world. The articles deal with clinical orthopaedic surgery or basic research directly connected with orthopaedic surgery. International Orthopaedics will also link all the members of SICOT by means of an insert that will be concerned with SICOT matters.
Finally, it is expected that news and information regarding all aspects of orthopaedic surgery, including meetings, panels, instructional courses, etc. will be brought to the attention of the readers.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
Reports of animal experiments must state that the "Principles of laboratory animal care" (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1985) were followed, as well as specific national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals) where applicable.
The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfil the above-mentioned requirements.