Predictors of Urinary Neopterin Concentration in Primates: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis

IF 1.7 3区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY
Verónica Torres-Solórzano, Ariadna Rangel-Negrín, Pedro A. D. Dias
{"title":"Predictors of Urinary Neopterin Concentration in Primates: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis","authors":"Verónica Torres-Solórzano,&nbsp;Ariadna Rangel-Negrín,&nbsp;Pedro A. D. Dias","doi":"10.1002/ajp.70189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Ecoimmunological research in primates increasingly uses urinary neopterin as a noninvasive biomarker of cell-mediated immune activation, but primary studies often disagree on the magnitude and sometimes direction of neopterin-predictor associations, and modest sample sizes limit single-study inferences. We synthesized this literature through a systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis, extracting 83 effect sizes from 13 studies encompassing eight species and 12 populations. Effects were modeled as partial correlations using a three-level random-effects structure with effect sizes nested within studies and species as a crossed random effect, and assigned to six predictor categories (environment, individual characteristics, health, behavior, storage, and individual-by-environment), four individual predictor labels (age, sex, seasonality, infection), and two study designs (naturalistic vs. structured). The overall pooled effect was small but statistically significant. All heterogeneity resided at the effect-size level; the between-study and between-species variance components were estimated at zero. Predictor category moderated the association: environmental predictors yielded the largest effect, followed by individual characteristics, while health, behavior, and storage effects did not differ from zero. The age-specific estimate was consistent in direction across 10 studies, supporting urinary neopterin's value for studying immunosenescence. Naturalistic and structured designs returned similar estimates. A collapsed-population sensitivity analysis confirmed that no single population drove the results, and no evidence of publication bias was detected. Ecological context is the primary aggregate-level predictor of urinary neopterin variation, and neopterin-predictor relationships are consistent across primate species, supporting its utility as a standardized comparative biomarker for primate ecoimmunology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7662,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Primatology","volume":"88 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Primatology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajp.70189","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecoimmunological research in primates increasingly uses urinary neopterin as a noninvasive biomarker of cell-mediated immune activation, but primary studies often disagree on the magnitude and sometimes direction of neopterin-predictor associations, and modest sample sizes limit single-study inferences. We synthesized this literature through a systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis, extracting 83 effect sizes from 13 studies encompassing eight species and 12 populations. Effects were modeled as partial correlations using a three-level random-effects structure with effect sizes nested within studies and species as a crossed random effect, and assigned to six predictor categories (environment, individual characteristics, health, behavior, storage, and individual-by-environment), four individual predictor labels (age, sex, seasonality, infection), and two study designs (naturalistic vs. structured). The overall pooled effect was small but statistically significant. All heterogeneity resided at the effect-size level; the between-study and between-species variance components were estimated at zero. Predictor category moderated the association: environmental predictors yielded the largest effect, followed by individual characteristics, while health, behavior, and storage effects did not differ from zero. The age-specific estimate was consistent in direction across 10 studies, supporting urinary neopterin's value for studying immunosenescence. Naturalistic and structured designs returned similar estimates. A collapsed-population sensitivity analysis confirmed that no single population drove the results, and no evidence of publication bias was detected. Ecological context is the primary aggregate-level predictor of urinary neopterin variation, and neopterin-predictor relationships are consistent across primate species, supporting its utility as a standardized comparative biomarker for primate ecoimmunology.

Abstract Image

灵长类动物尿新蝶呤浓度的预测因素:一项多水平荟萃分析。
灵长类动物的生态免疫学研究越来越多地使用尿新蝶呤作为细胞介导的免疫激活的非侵入性生物标志物,但初步研究往往在新蝶呤预测关联的程度和方向上存在分歧,而且适度的样本量限制了单项研究的推断。我们通过系统回顾和多水平荟萃分析综合了这些文献,从13项研究中提取了83个效应值,涉及8个物种和12个种群。使用三层随机效应结构将效应大小嵌套在研究中,将物种作为交叉随机效应,将效应建模为偏相关性,并将其分配到六个预测类别(环境,个体特征,健康,行为,储存和个体环境),四个个体预测标签(年龄,性别,季节性,感染)和两个研究设计(自然与结构化)。总的综合效应很小,但具有统计学意义。所有异质性均存在于效应量水平;研究间和物种间方差分量估计为零。预测因素类别缓和了这种关联:环境预测因素产生的影响最大,其次是个人特征,而健康、行为和储存的影响几乎为零。年龄特异性估计在10项研究的方向上是一致的,支持尿新蝶呤在研究免疫衰老方面的价值。自然主义和结构化的设计得到了类似的估计。坍缩群体敏感性分析证实,没有单一群体驱动结果,也没有发现发表偏倚的证据。生态环境是尿新蝶呤变异的主要综合水平预测因子,新蝶呤预测因子关系在灵长类动物物种中是一致的,支持其作为灵长类动物生态免疫学标准化比较生物标志物的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
103
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The objective of the American Journal of Primatology is to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas and findings among primatologists and to convey our increasing understanding of this order of animals to specialists and interested readers alike. Primatology is an unusual science in that its practitioners work in a wide variety of departments and institutions, live in countries throughout the world, and carry out a vast range of research procedures. Whether we are anthropologists, psychologists, biologists, or medical researchers, whether we live in Japan, Kenya, Brazil, or the United States, whether we conduct naturalistic observations in the field or experiments in the lab, we are united in our goal of better understanding primates. Our studies of nonhuman primates are of interest to scientists in many other disciplines ranging from entomology to sociology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书