Rostral lesion shift and tract-specific degeneration drive functional heterogeneity in degenerative cervical myelopathy.

IF 7.4 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Fauziyya Muhammad, Dario Pfyffer, Nicholas Dobson, Todd Parrish, Serena S Hu, John Ratliff, Nathaniel D Stetson, Yasin Dhaher, Andrew C Smith, Kenneth A Weber, Zachary A Smith
{"title":"Rostral lesion shift and tract-specific degeneration drive functional heterogeneity in degenerative cervical myelopathy.","authors":"Fauziyya Muhammad, Dario Pfyffer, Nicholas Dobson, Todd Parrish, Serena S Hu, John Ratliff, Nathaniel D Stetson, Yasin Dhaher, Andrew C Smith, Kenneth A Weber, Zachary A Smith","doi":"10.1038/s43856-026-01764-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the leading cause of spinal cord impairment worldwide, yet conventional magnetic resonance imaging metrics of canal stenosis fail to explain the remarkable heterogeneity in patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied automated deep-learning segmentation to map the topography of intramedullary lesions in 73 patients and determine their tract-specific functional impact. Functional measures included the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, comprising upper- and lower-body motor dysfunction, sensory function, and sphincter function domains; the Nine-Hole Peg Test for dexterity; and the Standing Balance Test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Here we show presence of T2-hyperintense lesions in 45% of the cohort, defining a biologically distinct phenotype associated with greater neurological disability. Spatially, lesion density peaked at C4, rostral to the site of maximal compression (C5), implicating venous congestion and ascending degeneration as key pathophysiological drivers. Multivariate modeling revealed that balance impairment represents a systems-level failure, predicted independently by combined damage to the dorsal columns (P = 0.032) and lateral reticulospinal tract (P = 0.011). In contrast, dexterity deficits were not attributable to any single tract, suggesting reliance on global cord integrity. Importantly, we found that unlike in traumatic spinal cord injury, residual tissue bridges (spared tissue) did not universally predict function; they conferred protective benefit for balance (P = 0.044) only when reticulospinal tract integrity was accounted for.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings establish tract-specific lesion profiling as a mechanistic biomarker, shifting the clinical framework from measuring global compression to characterizing biological vulnerability.</p>","PeriodicalId":72646,"journal":{"name":"Communications medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13714257/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-026-01764-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the leading cause of spinal cord impairment worldwide, yet conventional magnetic resonance imaging metrics of canal stenosis fail to explain the remarkable heterogeneity in patient outcomes.

Methods: We applied automated deep-learning segmentation to map the topography of intramedullary lesions in 73 patients and determine their tract-specific functional impact. Functional measures included the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, comprising upper- and lower-body motor dysfunction, sensory function, and sphincter function domains; the Nine-Hole Peg Test for dexterity; and the Standing Balance Test.

Results: Here we show presence of T2-hyperintense lesions in 45% of the cohort, defining a biologically distinct phenotype associated with greater neurological disability. Spatially, lesion density peaked at C4, rostral to the site of maximal compression (C5), implicating venous congestion and ascending degeneration as key pathophysiological drivers. Multivariate modeling revealed that balance impairment represents a systems-level failure, predicted independently by combined damage to the dorsal columns (P = 0.032) and lateral reticulospinal tract (P = 0.011). In contrast, dexterity deficits were not attributable to any single tract, suggesting reliance on global cord integrity. Importantly, we found that unlike in traumatic spinal cord injury, residual tissue bridges (spared tissue) did not universally predict function; they conferred protective benefit for balance (P = 0.044) only when reticulospinal tract integrity was accounted for.

Conclusions: These findings establish tract-specific lesion profiling as a mechanistic biomarker, shifting the clinical framework from measuring global compression to characterizing biological vulnerability.

在退行性颈椎病中,吻侧病变移位和束特异性变性驱动功能异质性。
背景:退行性颈椎病(DCM)是世界范围内脊髓损伤的主要原因,然而传统的椎管狭窄的磁共振成像指标无法解释患者结果的显著异质性。方法:我们应用自动深度学习分割技术绘制73例患者髓内病变的地形图,并确定其对神经束特异性功能的影响。功能测量包括修改后的日本骨科协会评分,包括上半身和下半身运动功能障碍、感觉功能和括约肌功能域;九孔钉测试灵巧度;站立平衡测试。结果:在这里,我们显示45%的队列中存在t2高强度病变,定义了与更大的神经功能障碍相关的生物学上独特的表型。在空间上,病变密度在C4,吻侧至最大压迫部位(C5)达到峰值,暗示静脉充血和上升变性是关键的病理生理驱动因素。多变量模型显示,平衡障碍代表一种系统层面的故障,可以通过背柱(P = 0.032)和外侧网状脊髓束(P = 0.011)的联合损伤独立预测。相比之下,灵巧性缺陷不能归因于任何单个束,这表明依赖于整体脐带完整性。重要的是,我们发现与创伤性脊髓损伤不同,残余组织桥(备用组织)并不能普遍预测功能;只有当网状脊髓束完整性被考虑时,它们才具有平衡的保护作用(P = 0.044)。结论:这些发现确立了导管特异性病变谱作为一种机制生物标志物,将临床框架从测量全局压缩转变为表征生物脆弱性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书