Sensor technologies to monitor sedentary behaviour in the workplace: a scoping review.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 ERGONOMICS
Anjia Ye, Matthew Schmidt, Ananda Maiti, Scott J Pedersen
{"title":"Sensor technologies to monitor sedentary behaviour in the workplace: a scoping review.","authors":"Anjia Ye, Matthew Schmidt, Ananda Maiti, Scott J Pedersen","doi":"10.1080/10803548.2026.2688645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objectives</i>. Prolonged sitting is now recognized as a major health risk for office workers and is a common target for workplace health interventions that encourage movement. The purpose of this scoping review is to identify and describe sensors that can be used to design responsive interventions targeting prolonged sitting and to evaluate them objectively. <i>Methods</i>. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and IEEE databases were searched. A total of 8520 articles were identified and screened for inclusion. A large language model tool was used to extract predefined data fields that were confirmed by the authors. <i>Results.</i> A total of 282 sensors were used in the 197 articles that met the inclusion criteria. The majority of these were accelerometer-based wearables; activPAL (<i>n</i> = 118) and ActiGraph (<i>n</i> = 60). Custom-made prototypes (<i>n</i> = 25) and non-wearable devices (<i>n</i> = 14) that measure behavioural variables (e.g., sitting and standing time, stepping, activity intensity and ergonomics) were identified. <i>Conclusions</i>. These findings highlight the dependence of most studies on accelerometer-based wearable sensors with their well-known characteristics. The use of non-wearable and emerging prototype sensors remains limited but offers potential advantages to the future studies. Relevant sensor considerations include user experience, cost, scalability and privacy concerns to facilitate broader adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":47704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2026.2688645","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. Prolonged sitting is now recognized as a major health risk for office workers and is a common target for workplace health interventions that encourage movement. The purpose of this scoping review is to identify and describe sensors that can be used to design responsive interventions targeting prolonged sitting and to evaluate them objectively. Methods. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and IEEE databases were searched. A total of 8520 articles were identified and screened for inclusion. A large language model tool was used to extract predefined data fields that were confirmed by the authors. Results. A total of 282 sensors were used in the 197 articles that met the inclusion criteria. The majority of these were accelerometer-based wearables; activPAL (n = 118) and ActiGraph (n = 60). Custom-made prototypes (n = 25) and non-wearable devices (n = 14) that measure behavioural variables (e.g., sitting and standing time, stepping, activity intensity and ergonomics) were identified. Conclusions. These findings highlight the dependence of most studies on accelerometer-based wearable sensors with their well-known characteristics. The use of non-wearable and emerging prototype sensors remains limited but offers potential advantages to the future studies. Relevant sensor considerations include user experience, cost, scalability and privacy concerns to facilitate broader adoption.

监测工作场所久坐行为的传感器技术:范围审查。
目标。久坐现在被认为是办公室工作人员的主要健康风险,也是鼓励运动的工作场所健康干预措施的共同目标。本综述的目的是识别和描述可用于设计针对久坐的响应性干预措施的传感器,并对其进行客观评估。方法。检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和IEEE数据库。共有8520篇文章被确定并筛选纳入。使用大型语言模型工具提取作者确认的预定义数据字段。结果。在符合纳入标准的197篇文章中,共使用了282个传感器。其中大多数是基于加速度计的可穿戴设备;actipal (n = 118)和ActiGraph (n = 60)。定制原型(n = 25)和非可穿戴设备(n = 14)测量行为变量(如坐下和站立时间、步行、活动强度和人体工程学)。结论。这些发现突出了大多数研究对基于加速度计的可穿戴传感器的依赖,这些传感器具有众所周知的特性。非可穿戴和新兴原型传感器的使用仍然有限,但为未来的研究提供了潜在的优势。相关的传感器考虑因素包括用户体验、成本、可扩展性和隐私问题,以促进更广泛的采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
152
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书