Deep learning for contrast-enhanced MRI in pediatric brain imaging.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-04 DOI:10.1007/s00234-026-04073-x
Anna Macula, Giovanni Morana, Fiorenza Coppola, Andrea Garnero, Andrea Rossi, Alberto Fringuello Mingo, Stefano Tambalo, Giovanni Valbusa, Fabio Tedoldi, Sonia Colombo Serra, Angelo Bifone
{"title":"Deep learning for contrast-enhanced MRI in pediatric brain imaging.","authors":"Anna Macula, Giovanni Morana, Fiorenza Coppola, Andrea Garnero, Andrea Rossi, Alberto Fringuello Mingo, Stefano Tambalo, Giovanni Valbusa, Fabio Tedoldi, Sonia Colombo Serra, Angelo Bifone","doi":"10.1007/s00234-026-04073-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A deep learning algorithm for contrast amplification in brain MRI, trained exclusively on adult data, was tested for cross-population generalization to pediatric patients, including subjects aged 0-2 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective monocentric dataset (n = 22 cases) comprising pediatric patients (0-17 years old) diagnosed with various brain tumors was used to evaluate the algorithm, which takes T1-weighted pre- and standard post-contrast images as input and generates an output image with amplified contrast, further post-processed with an HDR algorithm. Quantitative comparisons between standard and amplified images were performed using contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), contrast enhancement percentage (CEP), and lesion-to-background ratio (LBR). Three neuroradiologists performed qualitative assessment using a 4-point Likert scale, focusing on lesion contrast and delineation. Anatomical similarity was assessed using SSIM and log-Jacobian range. Statistical significance was evaluated using two-tailed paired t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to standard-dose images, contrast-amplified images showed significantly higher values for CNR (+ 186.5%), LBR (+ 61.9%), and CEP (+ 110.4%). Qualitative assessments demonstrated comparable lesion visualization, with improvements observed in selected cases. Reader 1 preferred the contrast-amplified image in 12 of 22 cases (54.5%), reader 2 favored it in 18 of 22 cases (81.8%) and reader 3 in 13/22 cases (59.1%). One reader reported improved overall image quality (mean score: 3.95 vs. 3.73). The average SSIM between amplified and standard-dose images was 0.98, and any significant anatomical differences were highlighted by the log-Jacobian range (p-value = 0.556).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An algorithm for contrast amplification based on deep learning, trained with adult data, significantly enhances quantitative contrast metrics in images from pediatric patients. It is preferred over standard-dose images in the majority of cases when used for pediatric brain MRI, indicating its promising application for cross-population applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":19422,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"3059-3069"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13680331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-026-04073-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: A deep learning algorithm for contrast amplification in brain MRI, trained exclusively on adult data, was tested for cross-population generalization to pediatric patients, including subjects aged 0-2 years.

Methods: A retrospective monocentric dataset (n = 22 cases) comprising pediatric patients (0-17 years old) diagnosed with various brain tumors was used to evaluate the algorithm, which takes T1-weighted pre- and standard post-contrast images as input and generates an output image with amplified contrast, further post-processed with an HDR algorithm. Quantitative comparisons between standard and amplified images were performed using contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), contrast enhancement percentage (CEP), and lesion-to-background ratio (LBR). Three neuroradiologists performed qualitative assessment using a 4-point Likert scale, focusing on lesion contrast and delineation. Anatomical similarity was assessed using SSIM and log-Jacobian range. Statistical significance was evaluated using two-tailed paired t-tests.

Results: Compared to standard-dose images, contrast-amplified images showed significantly higher values for CNR (+ 186.5%), LBR (+ 61.9%), and CEP (+ 110.4%). Qualitative assessments demonstrated comparable lesion visualization, with improvements observed in selected cases. Reader 1 preferred the contrast-amplified image in 12 of 22 cases (54.5%), reader 2 favored it in 18 of 22 cases (81.8%) and reader 3 in 13/22 cases (59.1%). One reader reported improved overall image quality (mean score: 3.95 vs. 3.73). The average SSIM between amplified and standard-dose images was 0.98, and any significant anatomical differences were highlighted by the log-Jacobian range (p-value = 0.556).

Conclusion: An algorithm for contrast amplification based on deep learning, trained with adult data, significantly enhances quantitative contrast metrics in images from pediatric patients. It is preferred over standard-dose images in the majority of cases when used for pediatric brain MRI, indicating its promising application for cross-population applicability.

儿童脑成像对比增强MRI的深度学习。
目的:对一种专门针对成人数据进行训练的用于脑MRI对比度放大的深度学习算法进行了跨人群推广测试,以适用于儿童患者,包括0-2岁的受试者。方法:采用回顾性单中心数据集(n = 22例),包括0-17岁诊断为各种脑肿瘤的儿童患者,对该算法进行评估。该算法以t1加权的前对比图像和标准后对比图像作为输入,生成对比度放大的输出图像,并通过HDR算法进行后处理。通过对比噪声比(CNR)、对比度增强百分比(CEP)和病灶背景比(LBR)对标准图像和放大图像进行定量比较。三名神经放射学家使用4点李克特量表进行定性评估,重点是病变对比和描绘。使用SSIM和对数雅可比矩阵范围评估解剖相似性。采用双尾配对t检验评估统计学显著性。结果:与标准剂量图像相比,对比放大图像的CNR(+ 186.5%)、LBR(+ 61.9%)和CEP(+ 110.4%)值显著升高。定性评估显示病变可见性相当,在选定病例中观察到改善。读者1 22例中有12例(54.5%)偏爱对比放大图像,读者2 22例中有18例(81.8%)偏爱对比放大图像,读者3 13例(59.1%)偏爱对比放大图像。一位读者报告了整体图像质量的提高(平均得分:3.95比3.73)。放大和标准剂量图像之间的平均SSIM为0.98,任何显著的解剖差异都被log-Jacobian范围突出(p值= 0.556)。结论:一种基于深度学习的对比度放大算法,经过成人数据的训练,可以显著增强儿科患者图像的定量对比度指标。在大多数情况下,它比标准剂量图像更适合用于儿童脑MRI,这表明它在跨人群适用性方面的应用前景广阔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroradiology
Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
214
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuroradiology aims to provide state-of-the-art medical and scientific information in the fields of Neuroradiology, Neurosciences, Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and related medical specialities. Neuroradiology as the official Journal of the European Society of Neuroradiology receives submissions from all parts of the world and publishes peer-reviewed original research, comprehensive reviews, educational papers, opinion papers, and short reports on exceptional clinical observations and new technical developments in the field of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention. The journal has subsections for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Advanced Neuroimaging, Paediatric Neuroradiology, Head-Neck-ENT Radiology, Spine Neuroradiology, and for submissions from Japan. Neuroradiology aims to provide new knowledge about and insights into the function and pathology of the human nervous system that may help to better diagnose and treat nervous system diseases. Neuroradiology is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follows the COPE core practices. Neuroradiology prefers articles that are free of bias, self-critical regarding limitations, transparent and clear in describing study participants, methods, and statistics, and short in presenting results. Before peer-review all submissions are automatically checked by iThenticate to assess for potential overlap in prior publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书