The Metacognitive Basis of Writing Strategies Used by English as a Foreign Language Students

IF 4.9 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Saiwaroon Chumpavan, Tanisaya Jiriyasin, Adel Al-Bataineh, John R. Baker, Sirawich Tampanich
{"title":"The Metacognitive Basis of Writing Strategies Used by English as a Foreign Language Students","authors":"Saiwaroon Chumpavan,&nbsp;Tanisaya Jiriyasin,&nbsp;Adel Al-Bataineh,&nbsp;John R. Baker,&nbsp;Sirawich Tampanich","doi":"10.1155/hbe2/6863923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recognizing that metacognition—the ability to monitor, understand, and regulate one′s thinking—is critical in the writing process, this study explored the metacognitive strategies (MCS) employed by undergraduate English majors of varying skill levels studying English composition in Thailand. Through qualitative analysis, the study investigated the specific types of MCS students utilize when writing in English and examined how they are applied throughout the writing process. Findings indicated that writers employ various strategies linked to their proficiency. Skilled writers effectively utilized MCS, whereas those with average or lower proficiency exhibited varying levels of ability and limitations. Additionally, variations linked to proficiency were observed in how participants employed MCS to plan, monitor, and refine their writing, including consulting external resources, simplifying ideas, and drawing on their L1. In line with this, it is recommended that teachers at all levels prioritize strategy instruction. It is also hoped that these findings will offer practical and theoretical insights for pedagogy and future research in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":36408,"journal":{"name":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hbe2/6863923","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hbe2/6863923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recognizing that metacognition—the ability to monitor, understand, and regulate one′s thinking—is critical in the writing process, this study explored the metacognitive strategies (MCS) employed by undergraduate English majors of varying skill levels studying English composition in Thailand. Through qualitative analysis, the study investigated the specific types of MCS students utilize when writing in English and examined how they are applied throughout the writing process. Findings indicated that writers employ various strategies linked to their proficiency. Skilled writers effectively utilized MCS, whereas those with average or lower proficiency exhibited varying levels of ability and limitations. Additionally, variations linked to proficiency were observed in how participants employed MCS to plan, monitor, and refine their writing, including consulting external resources, simplifying ideas, and drawing on their L1. In line with this, it is recommended that teachers at all levels prioritize strategy instruction. It is also hoped that these findings will offer practical and theoretical insights for pedagogy and future research in this area.

对外英语学生写作策略的元认知基础
认识到元认知——监控、理解和调节思维的能力——在写作过程中至关重要,本研究探讨了泰国不同技能水平的英语专业本科生学习英语作文时使用的元认知策略(MCS)。通过定性分析,本研究调查了学生在英语写作时使用的MCS的具体类型,并考察了它们在整个写作过程中的应用情况。研究结果表明,作者采用了与他们的熟练程度相关的各种策略。熟练的作家有效地利用了MCS,而熟练程度一般或较低的人则表现出不同程度的能力和局限性。此外,在参与者如何使用MCS来计划、监督和改进他们的写作方面,包括咨询外部资源、简化想法和利用他们的母语,观察到与熟练程度相关的变化。与此一致,建议各级教师优先考虑策略教学。同时也希望这些发现能够为该领域的教育学和未来的研究提供实践和理论的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
17.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-impact research that enhances understanding of the complex interactions between diverse human behavior and emerging digital technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书