Social Representations of the Therapeutic Relationship with a Transgender Person Among Psychologists

IF 1.5 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Luce Descudet, Loé Arnaud, Solenne Roux, Alexandre Pascual, Grégory Gouyet, Katia M'bailara
{"title":"Social Representations of the Therapeutic Relationship with a Transgender Person Among Psychologists","authors":"Luce Descudet,&nbsp;Loé Arnaud,&nbsp;Solenne Roux,&nbsp;Alexandre Pascual,&nbsp;Grégory Gouyet,&nbsp;Katia M'bailara","doi":"10.1002/capr.70179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>The therapeutic relationship is a central component of psychotherapy and a well-established predictor of treatment outcomes. However, despite extensive research in this area, the therapeutic relationship in psychological care for minority populations, particularly transgender clients, remains largely unexplored. This study aims to explore French psychologists' social representations of the therapeutic relationship with a transgender person. To do so, we relied on Abric's Central Core Theory as our theoretical framework.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The data were collected from a sample of 55 psychologists. We used prototypical analysis to identify the structuration of social representations and their central core element.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, psychologists view this relationship as grounded in empathic and compassionate listening, while emphasising the importance of alliance and respectful posture. Furthermore, the social representations appeared multidimensional. Notably, no elements appeared in the first periphery, suggesting a weak or insufficiently stabilised structuring of this concept.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These findings highlight the ongoing conceptual challenges in defining and operationalising the therapeutic relationship in this context, underscoring the need for more precise clinical guidelines and training to support work with stigmatised populations, in particular transgender clients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46997,"journal":{"name":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","volume":"26 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.70179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

The therapeutic relationship is a central component of psychotherapy and a well-established predictor of treatment outcomes. However, despite extensive research in this area, the therapeutic relationship in psychological care for minority populations, particularly transgender clients, remains largely unexplored. This study aims to explore French psychologists' social representations of the therapeutic relationship with a transgender person. To do so, we relied on Abric's Central Core Theory as our theoretical framework.

Methods

The data were collected from a sample of 55 psychologists. We used prototypical analysis to identify the structuration of social representations and their central core element.

Results

Overall, psychologists view this relationship as grounded in empathic and compassionate listening, while emphasising the importance of alliance and respectful posture. Furthermore, the social representations appeared multidimensional. Notably, no elements appeared in the first periphery, suggesting a weak or insufficiently stabilised structuring of this concept.

Conclusions

These findings highlight the ongoing conceptual challenges in defining and operationalising the therapeutic relationship in this context, underscoring the need for more precise clinical guidelines and training to support work with stigmatised populations, in particular transgender clients.

心理学家与跨性别者治疗关系的社会表征
背景和目的治疗关系是心理治疗的核心组成部分,也是治疗结果的一个公认的预测指标。然而,尽管在这一领域进行了广泛的研究,但在少数群体,特别是跨性别客户的心理护理中,治疗关系仍在很大程度上未被探索。本研究旨在探讨法国心理学家对跨性别者治疗关系的社会表征。为此,我们依靠Abric的中央核心理论作为我们的理论框架。方法对55名心理学家进行问卷调查。我们使用原型分析来确定社会表征的结构及其核心要素。总的来说,心理学家认为这种关系是建立在移情和富有同情心的倾听基础上的,同时强调了联盟和尊重姿态的重要性。此外,社会表征呈现多维度。值得注意的是,没有元素出现在第一个外围,这表明这一概念的结构薄弱或不够稳定。这些发现突出了在这种情况下,在定义和操作治疗关系方面持续存在的概念挑战,强调需要更精确的临床指南和培训,以支持对污名化人群,特别是跨性别客户的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Counselling and Psychotherapy Research is an innovative international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to linking research with practice. Pluralist in orientation, the journal recognises the value of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods strategies of inquiry and aims to promote high-quality, ethical research that informs and develops counselling and psychotherapy practice. CPR is a journal of the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy, promoting reflexive research strongly linked to practice. The journal has its own website: www.cprjournal.com. The aim of this site is to further develop links between counselling and psychotherapy research and practice by offering accessible information about both the specific contents of each issue of CPR, as well as wider developments in counselling and psychotherapy research. The aims are to ensure that research remains relevant to practice, and for practice to continue to inform research development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书