Analyzing travel time efficiency over long distance railway services throughout Europe

IF 6.8 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Journal of Transport Geography Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2026.104750
Matthias Benjamín Andrews García, Lucas Meyer de Freitas, Bernardo Martin-Iradi, Francesco Corman
{"title":"Analyzing travel time efficiency over long distance railway services throughout Europe","authors":"Matthias Benjamín Andrews García,&nbsp;Lucas Meyer de Freitas,&nbsp;Bernardo Martin-Iradi,&nbsp;Francesco Corman","doi":"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2026.104750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Long-distance railway transport is central to Europe’s sustainability and policy targets; however, long-distance railway trips are subject to inefficiently synchronized services, requiring long transfers and running at slow average speeds. We propose a metric that estimates the timetable-induced travel time efficiency, i.e., how much travel time is actually spent moving, compared to the time lost to badly synchronized transfers, excessive dwell times or suboptimal routing of services. We analyze this metric for the connections between 31,616 stations throughout Europe towards 25 main transit hubs. This metric reaches an average of around 75%: by providing better and seamless connections between fast trains along major corridors, end-to-end travel times could be 25% faster than current schedules without any specific construction of faster infrastructure. We consider 169 infrastructure projects — many of which form part of the planned Trans-European Network (TEN-T) network completion by 2050. Once the expected travel time reductions stemming from those improvements are taken into account, we anticipate a combined timetable-induced travel time efficiency of 68% compared to today, representing a future expectation of one-third shorter travel times. A corridor analysis evaluates the travel time savings along the expected high-speed core TEN-T planned to be concluded by 2050, and estimates comparable values. This analysis provides quantitative support, at a network scale and based on real-life data, to the hypothesis that a better coordination of Europe’s various national railway systems is needed and can be similarly effective for long-distance passengers as much more costly infrastructure development. The biggest policy implication from those findings is the need for increase in international collaboration and harmonization of timetabling processes to exploit the underused potential.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48413,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport Geography","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 104750"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport Geography","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692326002048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Long-distance railway transport is central to Europe’s sustainability and policy targets; however, long-distance railway trips are subject to inefficiently synchronized services, requiring long transfers and running at slow average speeds. We propose a metric that estimates the timetable-induced travel time efficiency, i.e., how much travel time is actually spent moving, compared to the time lost to badly synchronized transfers, excessive dwell times or suboptimal routing of services. We analyze this metric for the connections between 31,616 stations throughout Europe towards 25 main transit hubs. This metric reaches an average of around 75%: by providing better and seamless connections between fast trains along major corridors, end-to-end travel times could be 25% faster than current schedules without any specific construction of faster infrastructure. We consider 169 infrastructure projects — many of which form part of the planned Trans-European Network (TEN-T) network completion by 2050. Once the expected travel time reductions stemming from those improvements are taken into account, we anticipate a combined timetable-induced travel time efficiency of 68% compared to today, representing a future expectation of one-third shorter travel times. A corridor analysis evaluates the travel time savings along the expected high-speed core TEN-T planned to be concluded by 2050, and estimates comparable values. This analysis provides quantitative support, at a network scale and based on real-life data, to the hypothesis that a better coordination of Europe’s various national railway systems is needed and can be similarly effective for long-distance passengers as much more costly infrastructure development. The biggest policy implication from those findings is the need for increase in international collaboration and harmonization of timetabling processes to exploit the underused potential.
分析整个欧洲长途铁路服务的旅行时间效率
长途铁路运输是欧洲可持续发展和政策目标的核心;然而,长途铁路旅行受到同步服务效率低下的影响,需要长时间换乘,平均速度较慢。我们提出了一个度量来估计由时间表引起的旅行时间效率,即实际花费在移动上的旅行时间,与由于不同步的传输、过多的停留时间或次优的服务路由所损失的时间相比。我们分析了整个欧洲31,616个车站与25个主要交通枢纽之间的连接。这一指标平均达到75%左右:通过在主要走廊上的快速列车之间提供更好和无缝的连接,端到端旅行时间可能比目前的时间表快25%,而无需任何特定的快速基础设施建设。我们考虑了169个基础设施项目,其中许多是计划到2050年完成的跨欧洲网络(TEN-T)网络的一部分。一旦考虑到这些改进所带来的预期旅行时间减少,我们预计与目前相比,综合时间表导致的旅行时间效率将提高68%,这意味着未来的旅行时间预计将缩短三分之一。走廊分析评估了预计到2050年完成的高铁核心TEN-T沿线的旅行时间节省,并估计了可比值。该分析以网络规模和真实数据为基础,为以下假设提供了定量支持:需要更好地协调欧洲各个国家的铁路系统,对于长途乘客来说,这与成本更高的基础设施开发同样有效。这些调查结果对政策的最大影响是需要加强国际合作和统一时间表进程,以开发未充分利用的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: A major resurgence has occurred in transport geography in the wake of political and policy changes, huge transport infrastructure projects and responses to urban traffic congestion. The Journal of Transport Geography provides a central focus for developments in this rapidly expanding sub-discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书