Looking at the back of a document: a case of repurposing swastikas into creating Polish statehood in bureaucratic practices in the formerly German lands (1945–1948)

IF 1.2 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Karolina Ćwiek-Rogalska, Izabela Mrzygłód
{"title":"Looking at the back of a document: a case of repurposing swastikas into creating Polish statehood in bureaucratic practices in the formerly German lands (1945–1948)","authors":"Karolina Ćwiek-Rogalska,&nbsp;Izabela Mrzygłód","doi":"10.1007/s10502-026-09554-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Traditionally, the reverse sides of archival documents have attracted little attention from either archivists or historians, except in cases of palimpsests. What remains understudied is that they are material surfaces that might influence the circulation of documents. To challenge this conventional understanding, we propose a close analysis of the repurposing of documents bearing swastikas within the bureaucratic practices of post-1945 Poland. The redrawing of Poland’s borders after 1945 and the incorporation of formerly German territories confronted Polish officials with an overwhelming presence of German material culture, including a substantial number of Nazi documents marked with the swastika. As a symbol of the brutal German occupation of 1939–45 and of the detested Nazi ideology, the swastika carried considerable emotional weight. Despite this, Polish officials reused these documents, writing on their reverse sides and thereby reintroducing them into circulation. We argue that this practice is possible to be interpreted not merely as a pragmatic response to post-war paper shortages but a deliberate act: a form of symbolic retribution against German symbols and, by extension, against the Germans and their state. Drawing on Alison Wiggins’ approach to the materiality of documents, we interpret the turning over of the swastika as a performative act of resistance. Thus, this analysis uncovers the post-war emotions and meanings embedded within these documents. By foregrounding the performative dimensions of documentary practice, along with its temporality and material entanglements in processes of information exchange, our theoretical framework offers a potential of a novel lens for examining the role of documents in post-conflict bureaucratic and archival contexts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46131,"journal":{"name":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","volume":"26 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10502-026-09554-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-026-09554-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditionally, the reverse sides of archival documents have attracted little attention from either archivists or historians, except in cases of palimpsests. What remains understudied is that they are material surfaces that might influence the circulation of documents. To challenge this conventional understanding, we propose a close analysis of the repurposing of documents bearing swastikas within the bureaucratic practices of post-1945 Poland. The redrawing of Poland’s borders after 1945 and the incorporation of formerly German territories confronted Polish officials with an overwhelming presence of German material culture, including a substantial number of Nazi documents marked with the swastika. As a symbol of the brutal German occupation of 1939–45 and of the detested Nazi ideology, the swastika carried considerable emotional weight. Despite this, Polish officials reused these documents, writing on their reverse sides and thereby reintroducing them into circulation. We argue that this practice is possible to be interpreted not merely as a pragmatic response to post-war paper shortages but a deliberate act: a form of symbolic retribution against German symbols and, by extension, against the Germans and their state. Drawing on Alison Wiggins’ approach to the materiality of documents, we interpret the turning over of the swastika as a performative act of resistance. Thus, this analysis uncovers the post-war emotions and meanings embedded within these documents. By foregrounding the performative dimensions of documentary practice, along with its temporality and material entanglements in processes of information exchange, our theoretical framework offers a potential of a novel lens for examining the role of documents in post-conflict bureaucratic and archival contexts.

从文件的背面看:在原德国土地上的官僚实践中,重新利用纳粹标志创建波兰国家的案例(1945-1948)
传统上,档案文件的反面很少引起档案工作者或历史学家的注意,除非是在重写的情况下。尚未得到充分研究的是,它们是可能影响文件流通的材料表面。为了挑战这种传统的理解,我们建议仔细分析1945年后波兰官僚实践中带有纳粹标志的文件的重新用途。1945年后,波兰重新划定边界,合并前德国领土,波兰官员面临着德国物质文化的压倒性存在,包括大量标有纳粹十字记号的纳粹文件。作为1939年至1945年德国残酷占领和令人憎恶的纳粹意识形态的象征,卐字具有相当大的情感分量。尽管如此,波兰官员还是重新使用了这些文件,在它们的反面写字,从而使它们重新进入流通。我们认为,这种做法不仅可以被解释为对战后纸张短缺的务实回应,而且可以被解释为一种蓄意行为:一种针对德国象征的象征性报复,进而针对德国人和他们的国家。借鉴艾莉森·威金斯(Alison Wiggins)对文件物质性的处理方法,我们将纳粹十字记号的翻转解释为一种抵抗的表演行为。因此,这一分析揭示了这些文件中蕴含的战后情感和意义。通过突出文献实践的表现性维度,以及它在信息交换过程中的时间性和物质纠缠,我们的理论框架为研究冲突后官僚和档案背景下文献的作用提供了一个潜在的新视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ARCHIVAL SCIENCE
ARCHIVAL SCIENCE INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.20%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Archival Science promotes the development of archival science as an autonomous scientific discipline. The journal covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practice. Moreover, it investigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and data. It also seeks to promote the exchange and comparison of concepts, views and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the world.Archival Science''s approach is integrated, interdisciplinary, and intercultural. Its scope encompasses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context. To meet its objectives, the journal draws from scientific disciplines that deal with the function of records and the way they are created, preserved, and retrieved; the context in which information is generated, managed, and used; and the social and cultural environment of records creation at different times and places.Covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practiceInvestigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and dataPromotes the exchange and comparison of concepts, views, and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the worldAddresses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书