Neural responses to conflicting self- and partner-directed feedback correlate with trait emotion regulation and daily support.

IF 6.4
Shanshan Ma, Erin L Maresh, Andrea M Coppola, Katherine E Richard, Leonie Koban, Diego Guevara Beltran, David A Sbarra, Jessica R Andrews-Hanna
{"title":"Neural responses to conflicting self- and partner-directed feedback correlate with trait emotion regulation and daily support.","authors":"Shanshan Ma, Erin L Maresh, Andrea M Coppola, Katherine E Richard, Leonie Koban, Diego Guevara Beltran, David A Sbarra, Jessica R Andrews-Hanna","doi":"10.1038/s44271-026-00493-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Empathy lies at the core of social interactions, particularly in intimate relationships, yet few laboratory tasks are designed to capture empathy in interpersonal contexts-especially those requiring individuals to simultaneously process social information directed toward both the self and a romantic partner. In this exploratory study, 131 adults (from 71 romantic couples) completed a neuroimaging paradigm that manipulated whether positive or negative partner-directed feedback was presented alone or alongside self-directed feedback. The partner-alone feedback contrasts (partner-directed feedback alone versus a neutral control condition) robustly engaged brain regions associated with empathic responding, including the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and temporoparietal junction. Notably, during the incongruent feedback contrasts-simultaneous conflicting self- and partner-directed feedback versus self-directed feedback alone-participants exhibited diminished affective and brain responses but evidenced unique brain activity in frontoparietal areas frequently associated with cognitive control (e.g., dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and supramarginal gyrus). Furthermore, when responding to positive partner-directed feedback in the presence of negative self-directed feedback, enhanced activity in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex was associated with lower self-reported difficulties in emotion regulation and more partner-rated support provided in everyday life. Taken together, these findings suggest that salient self-focused information may dampen individuals' emotional and neural responses to their partners' uplifting and critical feedback, that emotion regulation tendencies may be an important between-subjects moderator of this effect, and that individual differences in spontaneous neural responses during this task were associated with meaningful real-world outcomes, although further validation and replication are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":501698,"journal":{"name":"Communications Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-026-00493-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Empathy lies at the core of social interactions, particularly in intimate relationships, yet few laboratory tasks are designed to capture empathy in interpersonal contexts-especially those requiring individuals to simultaneously process social information directed toward both the self and a romantic partner. In this exploratory study, 131 adults (from 71 romantic couples) completed a neuroimaging paradigm that manipulated whether positive or negative partner-directed feedback was presented alone or alongside self-directed feedback. The partner-alone feedback contrasts (partner-directed feedback alone versus a neutral control condition) robustly engaged brain regions associated with empathic responding, including the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and temporoparietal junction. Notably, during the incongruent feedback contrasts-simultaneous conflicting self- and partner-directed feedback versus self-directed feedback alone-participants exhibited diminished affective and brain responses but evidenced unique brain activity in frontoparietal areas frequently associated with cognitive control (e.g., dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and supramarginal gyrus). Furthermore, when responding to positive partner-directed feedback in the presence of negative self-directed feedback, enhanced activity in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex was associated with lower self-reported difficulties in emotion regulation and more partner-rated support provided in everyday life. Taken together, these findings suggest that salient self-focused information may dampen individuals' emotional and neural responses to their partners' uplifting and critical feedback, that emotion regulation tendencies may be an important between-subjects moderator of this effect, and that individual differences in spontaneous neural responses during this task were associated with meaningful real-world outcomes, although further validation and replication are warranted.

神经反应相互冲突的自我和伴侣指导反馈与特质情绪调节和日常支持相关。
同理心是社会互动的核心,尤其是在亲密关系中,然而很少有实验室任务是设计来捕捉人际关系背景下的同理心——尤其是那些要求个人同时处理针对自我和浪漫伴侣的社会信息的实验。在这项探索性研究中,131名成年人(来自71对恋人)完成了一项神经成像范式,该范式控制了积极或消极的伴侣导向反馈是单独呈现还是与自我导向反馈一起呈现。单独的伴侣反馈对比(单独的伴侣定向反馈与中性对照条件)强有力地激活了与共情反应相关的大脑区域,包括背前扣带皮层、岛叶前部、背内侧前额叶皮层和颞顶叶连接。值得注意的是,在不一致反馈对比中——同时相互冲突的自我和伴侣导向反馈与单独的自我导向反馈——参与者表现出减少的情感和大脑反应,但在经常与认知控制相关的额顶叶区域(例如,背外侧前额叶皮层和边缘上回)显示出独特的大脑活动。此外,当在消极的自我反馈中对积极的伴侣指导反馈做出反应时,背内侧前额叶皮层的活动增强与自我报告的情绪调节困难较低和在日常生活中提供更多伴侣评价的支持有关。综上所述,这些发现表明,显著的自我关注信息可能会抑制个体对其伴侣的振奋和批评反馈的情绪和神经反应,情绪调节倾向可能是这种效应的重要受试者之间的调节因素,并且在该任务中自发神经反应的个体差异与有意义的现实世界结果有关,尽管进一步的验证和复制是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书