How the introduction of a specialist triage tool in a community palliative care setting impacts referral to review time and staff wellbeing.

International journal of palliative nursing Pub Date : 2026-06-02 Epub Date: 2026-07-02 DOI:10.12968/ijpn.2026.0005
Sara Smith, Katy Menear
{"title":"How the introduction of a specialist triage tool in a community palliative care setting impacts referral to review time and staff wellbeing.","authors":"Sara Smith, Katy Menear","doi":"10.12968/ijpn.2026.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>At Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust, high referral volumes were overwhelming the community palliative care team, leading to delays in triage and patient contact alongside existing workloads. To improve this, a triage nurse role was introduced to assess and allocate new referrals, supported by a triage tool. This streamlined the review of clinical information and enabled timely telephone contact and appropriate clinical nurse specialist visits.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To enhance patient care by systematically evaluating clinical performance and attitudes towards the newly implemented triage tool, as well as assessing the team's wellbeing with a focus on reducing team pressure and redirecting the triage process.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This clinical audit evaluated a service improvement initiative using a mixed-methods approach. An anonymous questionnaire was sent to the clinical nurse specialist and administrative teams to gather views on the triage tool. An audit of referral-to-first-contact times was also conducted using 20 randomly selected patient records (10 pre- and 10 post-implementation) from the team database. The audit was carried out by the care group quality nurse to reduce bias. Pre- and post-implementation groups were comparable, with no other significant service changes during the period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that using the triage tool improved the time from referral received to first patient contact, and supported team wellbeing through the process of clearly defining roles and responsibilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of a triage tool has enabled a more efficient and systematic method for prioritising patient referrals and allocating workload and resources equitably.</p>","PeriodicalId":94055,"journal":{"name":"International journal of palliative nursing","volume":"32 6","pages":"270-274"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of palliative nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2026.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: At Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust, high referral volumes were overwhelming the community palliative care team, leading to delays in triage and patient contact alongside existing workloads. To improve this, a triage nurse role was introduced to assess and allocate new referrals, supported by a triage tool. This streamlined the review of clinical information and enabled timely telephone contact and appropriate clinical nurse specialist visits.

Aims: To enhance patient care by systematically evaluating clinical performance and attitudes towards the newly implemented triage tool, as well as assessing the team's wellbeing with a focus on reducing team pressure and redirecting the triage process.

Method: This clinical audit evaluated a service improvement initiative using a mixed-methods approach. An anonymous questionnaire was sent to the clinical nurse specialist and administrative teams to gather views on the triage tool. An audit of referral-to-first-contact times was also conducted using 20 randomly selected patient records (10 pre- and 10 post-implementation) from the team database. The audit was carried out by the care group quality nurse to reduce bias. Pre- and post-implementation groups were comparable, with no other significant service changes during the period.

Results: Results showed that using the triage tool improved the time from referral received to first patient contact, and supported team wellbeing through the process of clearly defining roles and responsibilities.

Conclusion: The implementation of a triage tool has enabled a more efficient and systematic method for prioritising patient referrals and allocating workload and resources equitably.

在社区姑息治疗环境中引入专业分诊工具如何影响转诊审查时间和员工福利。
背景:在沃尔索尔医疗保健NHS信托,高转诊量压倒了社区姑息治疗团队,导致分流和患者接触的延误以及现有的工作量。为了改善这一点,引入了一个分诊护士的角色来评估和分配新的转诊,由分诊工具支持。这简化了对临床信息的审查,并使及时的电话联系和适当的临床护士专家访问成为可能。目的:通过系统地评估临床表现和对新实施的分诊工具的态度,以及评估团队的健康,重点是减少团队压力和重新定向分诊过程,从而提高患者护理水平。方法:本临床审计评估的服务改进倡议使用混合方法的方法。向临床护理专家和行政团队发送了一份匿名问卷,以收集对分诊工具的意见。还使用从团队数据库中随机选择的20例患者记录(10例实施前和10例实施后)对转诊至首次接触时间进行了审计。审计由护理组质量护士进行,以减少偏见。实施前组和实施后组具有可比性,在此期间没有其他重大的服务变化。结果:结果表明,使用分诊工具缩短了从收到转诊到首次患者接触的时间,并通过明确定义角色和责任的过程支持团队幸福感。结论:分诊工具的实施为优先安排患者转诊和公平分配工作量和资源提供了更有效和系统的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书