Practices and perceptions of advanced endoscopic imaging techniques for colorectal neoplasia detection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: report of a survey among Canadian inflammatory bowel disease specialists

iGIE Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-14 DOI:10.1016/j.igie.2026.02.006
Lisa M.A. van Lierop MD, PhD, Rebecca Dang MSc, Talat Bessissow MD, MSc, Neeraj Narula MD, MPH, Timothy Ramsay PhD, Peter Greenstreet PhD, Frank Hoentjen MD, PhD, Sanjay K. Murthy MD, MSc
{"title":"Practices and perceptions of advanced endoscopic imaging techniques for colorectal neoplasia detection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: report of a survey among Canadian inflammatory bowel disease specialists","authors":"Lisa M.A. van Lierop MD, PhD,&nbsp;Rebecca Dang MSc,&nbsp;Talat Bessissow MD, MSc,&nbsp;Neeraj Narula MD, MPH,&nbsp;Timothy Ramsay PhD,&nbsp;Peter Greenstreet PhD,&nbsp;Frank Hoentjen MD, PhD,&nbsp;Sanjay K. Murthy MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.igie.2026.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>This study surveyed Canadian inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) specialists to understand their perceptions, preferences, and practices regarding image-enhancement modalities (including dye-spray chromoendoscopy [DCE], virtual chromoendoscopy [VCE], and artificial intelligence [AI]-aided endoscopy) for colorectal neoplasia (CRN) detection in IBD, to inform future studies and recommendations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Developed collaboratively by IBD experts and methodologists, the survey assessed physicians' attitudes toward colonoscopy image-enhancement modalities for CRN surveillance in IBD, evaluating 5 domains: current practices, familiarity with advanced techniques, perceptions of AI-assisted endoscopy, barriers to adoption, and research priorities. It was distributed to IBD specialists affiliated with the Canadian IBD Research Consortium and conducted per The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 82 specialists invited, 33 responded (40.2%). Most worked in academic centers (90%); 39.4% managed large IBD practices. VCE was the most used advanced imaging modality (84.8%), followed by DCE (33.3%), high-definition white-light endoscopy (HD-WLE) plus nontargeted biopsies (33.3%), AI-assisted colonoscopy (18.2%), and HD-WLE alone (6.1%). Although 60.6% considered DCE and VCE similarly effective, drawbacks included bowel preparation (VCE: 26.6%; DCE: 24.1%) and poor visualization with inflammation (VCE: 26.6%; DCE: 12%). AI-assisted colonoscopy was seen as promising for CRN detection; 78.8% agreed randomized controlled trials are needed, and 39.4% would adopt AI if it improved CRN detection by 5% over HD-WLE.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This survey highlights a shift toward VCE over DCE, perceived drawbacks of chromoendoscopy, limited availability and uncertainty about AI-assisted colonoscopy, and a desire for research to demonstrate AI's utility for CRN detection in IBD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100652,"journal":{"name":"iGIE","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 173-181.e6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13324128/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iGIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949708626000294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

This study surveyed Canadian inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) specialists to understand their perceptions, preferences, and practices regarding image-enhancement modalities (including dye-spray chromoendoscopy [DCE], virtual chromoendoscopy [VCE], and artificial intelligence [AI]-aided endoscopy) for colorectal neoplasia (CRN) detection in IBD, to inform future studies and recommendations.

Methods

Developed collaboratively by IBD experts and methodologists, the survey assessed physicians' attitudes toward colonoscopy image-enhancement modalities for CRN surveillance in IBD, evaluating 5 domains: current practices, familiarity with advanced techniques, perceptions of AI-assisted endoscopy, barriers to adoption, and research priorities. It was distributed to IBD specialists affiliated with the Canadian IBD Research Consortium and conducted per The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines.

Results

Of 82 specialists invited, 33 responded (40.2%). Most worked in academic centers (90%); 39.4% managed large IBD practices. VCE was the most used advanced imaging modality (84.8%), followed by DCE (33.3%), high-definition white-light endoscopy (HD-WLE) plus nontargeted biopsies (33.3%), AI-assisted colonoscopy (18.2%), and HD-WLE alone (6.1%). Although 60.6% considered DCE and VCE similarly effective, drawbacks included bowel preparation (VCE: 26.6%; DCE: 24.1%) and poor visualization with inflammation (VCE: 26.6%; DCE: 12%). AI-assisted colonoscopy was seen as promising for CRN detection; 78.8% agreed randomized controlled trials are needed, and 39.4% would adopt AI if it improved CRN detection by 5% over HD-WLE.

Conclusions

This survey highlights a shift toward VCE over DCE, perceived drawbacks of chromoendoscopy, limited availability and uncertainty about AI-assisted colonoscopy, and a desire for research to demonstrate AI's utility for CRN detection in IBD.
炎性肠病患者结肠肿瘤检测的先进内镜成像技术的实践和认知:加拿大炎性肠病专家的一项调查报告。
背景和目的:本研究调查了加拿大炎症性肠病(IBD)专家,了解他们对图像增强方式(包括染料喷雾染色内镜[DCE]、虚拟染色内镜[VCE]和人工智能[AI]辅助内镜)检测IBD结肠直肠癌(CRN)的看法、偏好和实践,为未来的研究和建议提供信息。方法:该调查由IBD专家和方法学家共同开发,评估了医生对IBD中用于CRN监测的结肠镜图像增强模式的态度,评估了5个领域:当前实践、对先进技术的熟悉程度、对人工智能辅助内窥镜的认知、采用障碍和研究重点。它被分发给隶属于加拿大IBD研究联盟的IBD专家,并根据加强流行病学观察性研究报告指南进行。结果:在邀请的82名专家中,回复33名(40.2%)。大多数在学术中心工作(90%);39.4%管理大型IBD实践。VCE是使用最多的先进成像方式(84.8%),其次是DCE(33.3%)、高清白光内镜(HD-WLE)加非靶向活检(33.3%)、人工智能辅助结肠镜检查(18.2%)和单独使用HD-WLE(6.1%)。尽管60.6%的人认为DCE和VCE同样有效,但缺点包括肠道准备(VCE: 26.6%; DCE: 24.1%)和炎症表现不佳(VCE: 26.6%; DCE: 12%)。人工智能辅助结肠镜检查被视为有希望检测CRN;78.8%的人认为有必要进行随机对照试验,如果人工智能比HD-WLE提高5%的CRN检测能力,39.4%的人会采用人工智能。结论:该调查强调了从DCE到VCE的转变,色素内窥镜的缺点,人工智能辅助结肠镜的有限可用性和不确定性,以及研究证明人工智能在IBD中用于CRN检测的实用性的愿望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书