Beyond distance and heart rate: Reading 6-minute walk test via blood pressure variability in chronic heart failure.

Wen-Lu Xing, Tong Liu
{"title":"Beyond distance and heart rate: Reading 6-minute walk test <i>via</i> blood pressure variability in chronic heart failure.","authors":"Wen-Lu Xing, Tong Liu","doi":"10.5493/wjem.v16.i2.116315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The six-minute walk test (6MWT) remains a tool for assessing exercise capacity in heart failure, with six-minute walk distance as the endpoint. To enhance interpretability, vital signs such as heart rate and blood pressure may also be recorded in accordance with technical statements. However, beta-blockers often blunt heart-rate-based readouts during the 6MWT, thereby reducing the interpretability of six-minute walk distance. Akimova <i>et al</i> recently published a study in <i>World Journal of Experimental Medicine</i>, which identified blood pressure variability (BPV) as a minutes-scale recovery signal during a paired 6MWT. The index targets the 20-minute post-exercise recovery window and uses point-to-point systolic blood pressure change to help characterize cardiac reserve and to enhance interpretation of the 6MWT. The measure is low cost and easy to implement, and BPV remains associated with imaging indices such as left ventricular ejection fraction in beta-blocked heart failure populations. Importantly, this should be viewed as an early, proof-of-concept insight. Future work should confirm these findings in multicenter prospective studies, define operational protocols and thresholds for BPV, and explore relationships with clinical outcomes, thereby further enhancing the value of minutes-scale BPV.</p>","PeriodicalId":75340,"journal":{"name":"World journal of experimental medicine","volume":"16 2","pages":"116315"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13323935/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of experimental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5493/wjem.v16.i2.116315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The six-minute walk test (6MWT) remains a tool for assessing exercise capacity in heart failure, with six-minute walk distance as the endpoint. To enhance interpretability, vital signs such as heart rate and blood pressure may also be recorded in accordance with technical statements. However, beta-blockers often blunt heart-rate-based readouts during the 6MWT, thereby reducing the interpretability of six-minute walk distance. Akimova et al recently published a study in World Journal of Experimental Medicine, which identified blood pressure variability (BPV) as a minutes-scale recovery signal during a paired 6MWT. The index targets the 20-minute post-exercise recovery window and uses point-to-point systolic blood pressure change to help characterize cardiac reserve and to enhance interpretation of the 6MWT. The measure is low cost and easy to implement, and BPV remains associated with imaging indices such as left ventricular ejection fraction in beta-blocked heart failure populations. Importantly, this should be viewed as an early, proof-of-concept insight. Future work should confirm these findings in multicenter prospective studies, define operational protocols and thresholds for BPV, and explore relationships with clinical outcomes, thereby further enhancing the value of minutes-scale BPV.

超越距离和心率:阅读6分钟步行测试通过血压变异性慢性心力衰竭。
6分钟步行试验(6MWT)仍然是评估心力衰竭患者运动能力的工具,以6分钟步行距离为终点。为了提高可解释性,心率和血压等生命体征也可以根据技术声明进行记录。然而,β受体阻滞剂通常会在6MWT期间使基于心率的读数变钝,从而降低了6分钟步行距离的可解释性。Akimova等人最近在《世界实验医学杂志》上发表了一项研究,该研究将血压变异性(BPV)确定为配对6MWT期间的分钟级恢复信号。该指数以运动后20分钟的恢复窗口为目标,使用点对点收缩压变化来帮助表征心脏储备,并增强对6MWT的解释。该方法成本低且易于实施,并且在β -阻滞性心力衰竭人群中,BPV仍与左心室射血分数等成像指标相关。重要的是,这应该被视为早期的概念验证。未来的工作应该在多中心前瞻性研究中证实这些发现,定义BPV的操作方案和阈值,并探索与临床结果的关系,从而进一步提高分量表BPV的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书