Detection of intracellular bacterial communities and biofilms in urinary tract infections with Escherichia coli using staining protocols.

Swathi Pandey, Arul Senghor Kadalangudi Aravaanan, Emmanuel Bhaskar, Santhi Silambanan
{"title":"Detection of intracellular bacterial communities and biofilms in urinary tract infections with <i>Escherichia coli</i> using staining protocols.","authors":"Swathi Pandey, Arul Senghor Kadalangudi Aravaanan, Emmanuel Bhaskar, Santhi Silambanan","doi":"10.5493/wjem.v16.i2.119306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are prevalent worldwide, and <i>Escherichia coli</i> (<i>E. coli</i>) is the most common causative agent. The ability of the bacteria to form intracellular bacterial communities (IBCs) and biofilm is a major reason for UTIs. Studies have indicated that the persistence of uropathogenic <i>E. coli</i> as IBCs and biofilms has been implicated in UTIs. However, IBCs are not routinely identified by standard diagnostic methods.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the various staining techniques for the detection of IBCs in urine samples from <i>E. coli</i> culture-positive UTI patients with the biofilm-forming capability of the isolates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 73 patients with <i>E. coli</i> culture-confirmed UTI. Before antibiotic treatment midstream urine sample was collected, and the sediment was obtained by centrifugation. The samples were visualized using Sternheimer-Malbin, Wright-Giemsa, Safranin, and immunofluorescence staining to detect IBCs. Formation of biofilms was analyzed by the tube method. Descriptive statistics were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><i>E. coli</i> clusters were seen by light microscopy using various stains. However, immunofluorescence staining showed a better picture in the form of bright intracellular signals, which indicate bacterial aggregates. Biofilm assay showed an association with intracellular colonization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The various staining techniques help in the identification of uropathogenic <i>E. coli</i> as IBCs inside superficial epithelial cells. These bacteria are also capable of forming biofilms, which resists action of antibiotics. Thus, IBCs and biofilms are rich reservoirs of organisms in the urinary bladder, paving the way for chronic treatment-resistant UTIs. This study requires further larger studies to substantiate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":75340,"journal":{"name":"World journal of experimental medicine","volume":"16 2","pages":"119306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13323932/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of experimental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5493/wjem.v16.i2.119306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are prevalent worldwide, and Escherichia coli (E. coli) is the most common causative agent. The ability of the bacteria to form intracellular bacterial communities (IBCs) and biofilm is a major reason for UTIs. Studies have indicated that the persistence of uropathogenic E. coli as IBCs and biofilms has been implicated in UTIs. However, IBCs are not routinely identified by standard diagnostic methods.

Aim: To compare the various staining techniques for the detection of IBCs in urine samples from E. coli culture-positive UTI patients with the biofilm-forming capability of the isolates.

Methods: The study included 73 patients with E. coli culture-confirmed UTI. Before antibiotic treatment midstream urine sample was collected, and the sediment was obtained by centrifugation. The samples were visualized using Sternheimer-Malbin, Wright-Giemsa, Safranin, and immunofluorescence staining to detect IBCs. Formation of biofilms was analyzed by the tube method. Descriptive statistics were used.

Results: E. coli clusters were seen by light microscopy using various stains. However, immunofluorescence staining showed a better picture in the form of bright intracellular signals, which indicate bacterial aggregates. Biofilm assay showed an association with intracellular colonization.

Conclusion: The various staining techniques help in the identification of uropathogenic E. coli as IBCs inside superficial epithelial cells. These bacteria are also capable of forming biofilms, which resists action of antibiotics. Thus, IBCs and biofilms are rich reservoirs of organisms in the urinary bladder, paving the way for chronic treatment-resistant UTIs. This study requires further larger studies to substantiate these findings.

尿路感染大肠杆菌细胞内细菌群落和生物膜的染色检测。
背景:尿路感染(uti)在世界范围内普遍存在,大肠杆菌(E. coli)是最常见的病原体。细菌形成细胞内细菌群落(IBCs)和生物膜的能力是uti的主要原因。研究表明,尿路致病性大肠杆菌作为IBCs和生物膜的持久性与尿路感染有关。然而,IBCs并不能通过标准诊断方法进行常规诊断。目的:比较不同染色技术对尿路感染大肠杆菌培养阳性患者尿液中IBCs的检测及分离物的生物膜形成能力。方法:本研究纳入73例大肠杆菌培养确诊的尿路感染患者。抗生素治疗前采集中游尿样,离心取沉淀物。使用Sternheimer-Malbin、Wright-Giemsa、Safranin和免疫荧光染色检测IBCs,对样品进行可视化。用试管法分析了生物膜的形成。采用描述性统计。结果:光镜下不同染色方法均可见大肠杆菌聚集。然而,免疫荧光染色以明亮的细胞内信号的形式显示了更好的图像,这表明细菌聚集。生物膜测定显示与细胞内定植有关。结论:各种染色技术有助于将尿路致病性大肠杆菌鉴定为浅表上皮细胞内的IBCs。这些细菌还能形成生物膜,抵抗抗生素的作用。因此,IBCs和生物膜是膀胱中丰富的生物体储存库,为慢性耐药uti铺平了道路。这项研究需要进一步的更大规模的研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书