Indications and Limits of Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches in Pediatric Neurosurgery.

José Hinojosa Mena-Bernal, María Victoria Becerra Castro, Mariana Alamar Abril, Diego Culebras Palao, Carlos Justo Valencia Calderón, Paula Casano Sancho, Cristóbal Langdon Montero
{"title":"Indications and Limits of Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches in Pediatric Neurosurgery.","authors":"José Hinojosa Mena-Bernal, María Victoria Becerra Castro, Mariana Alamar Abril, Diego Culebras Palao, Carlos Justo Valencia Calderón, Paula Casano Sancho, Cristóbal Langdon Montero","doi":"10.1007/978-3-032-22008-0_11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) are a safe and effective method for treating skull base lesions, including those in the sellar and parasellar areas. Pioneered initially for the treatment of skull base pathology in adults, these approaches have shown clear advantages including cost-effectiveness, limited blood loss, and improved visualization allowing for a better plane of dissection and clearing anatomical landmarks. However, in younger patients, this approach could be limited due to their developing anatomy, small anatomical corridors, or peculiarities of specific lesions which could not be amenable for a simple approach.The width of the piriform aperture, sphenoid bone pneumatization, and intercarotid distances at different coronal planes should all be considered during preoperative evaluation of pediatric patients for EEAs. EEAs below the age of 2 years at parasellar ICA level and below 4 years at paraclinoid ICA level should deserve particular attention. As children grow, the progressive pneumatization of paranasal sinuses expands the anatomy of these corridors and it is generally assumed that anatomical factors would not restrict an endoscopic transsphenoidal approach in children older than 5 years of age.The pediatric population offers unique challenges because of the smaller working spaces and the smaller size of the skull base involved.</p>","PeriodicalId":72077,"journal":{"name":"Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery","volume":"56 ","pages":"241-267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-22008-0_11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) are a safe and effective method for treating skull base lesions, including those in the sellar and parasellar areas. Pioneered initially for the treatment of skull base pathology in adults, these approaches have shown clear advantages including cost-effectiveness, limited blood loss, and improved visualization allowing for a better plane of dissection and clearing anatomical landmarks. However, in younger patients, this approach could be limited due to their developing anatomy, small anatomical corridors, or peculiarities of specific lesions which could not be amenable for a simple approach.The width of the piriform aperture, sphenoid bone pneumatization, and intercarotid distances at different coronal planes should all be considered during preoperative evaluation of pediatric patients for EEAs. EEAs below the age of 2 years at parasellar ICA level and below 4 years at paraclinoid ICA level should deserve particular attention. As children grow, the progressive pneumatization of paranasal sinuses expands the anatomy of these corridors and it is generally assumed that anatomical factors would not restrict an endoscopic transsphenoidal approach in children older than 5 years of age.The pediatric population offers unique challenges because of the smaller working spaces and the smaller size of the skull base involved.

小儿神经外科内鼻内镜入路的适应症和局限性。
内镜下鼻内入路(EEAs)是治疗颅底病变(包括鞍区和鞍旁区病变)安全有效的方法。这些方法最初用于治疗成人颅底病变,显示出明显的优势,包括成本效益,出血量有限,以及改善的可视化,允许更好的解剖平面和清除解剖标志。然而,在年轻患者中,由于其发育中的解剖结构,小的解剖走廊或特定病变的特殊性,这种方法可能受到限制,这些特征不能适用于简单的方法。梨状孔宽度、蝶骨通气、不同冠状面颈动脉间距均应在儿童EEAs患者术前评估中考虑。2岁以下的鞍旁ICA和4岁以下的斜旁ICA应特别注意。随着儿童的成长,鼻窦的渐进性气化扩大了这些通道的解剖结构,通常认为解剖因素不会限制5岁以上儿童的经蝶窦内镜入路。儿科人群提供了独特的挑战,因为较小的工作空间和较小的颅底。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书