Meraj Neyazi, Jan P Bremer, Jan Brederecke, Marius S Knorr, Ferdinand Seum, Carla Reinbold, Stefan Gross, Dora Csengeri, Stefan Blankenberg, Marcus Dörr, Marcus Vollmer, Renate Bonin-Schnabel
{"title":"Deep learning analysis of single-lead electrocardiograms enables pragmatic heart failure risk assessment in the general population.","authors":"Meraj Neyazi, Jan P Bremer, Jan Brederecke, Marius S Knorr, Ferdinand Seum, Carla Reinbold, Stefan Gross, Dora Csengeri, Stefan Blankenberg, Marcus Dörr, Marcus Vollmer, Renate Bonin-Schnabel","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztag099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Effective heart failure (HF) prevention requires early identification of high-risk individuals, yet population-wide stratification remains difficult. We evaluated whether deep learning using single-lead (lead I) electrocardiograms (ECGs), obtainable from medical systems and wearables, enables population-scale risk assessment. We developed AI-HF to estimate incident clinical HF risk using UK Biobank (UKB) data, validating in the prospective SHIP-START and SHIP-TREND cohorts.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The analysis included 31 740 UKB participants (median age 64, 5.2 year follow-up, 243 events), 3025 SHIP-START participants (age 50, 15 year follow-up, 166 events), and 1342 SHIP-TREND participants (age 51, 9 year follow-up, 84 events). Participants with prevalent HF were excluded. Performance was evaluated at a harmonized 5-year prediction horizon. C-indices for incident clinical HF were 0.693 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.654-0.732] in UKB, 0.715 (0.652-0.777) in SHIP-START, and 0.791 (0.749-0.833) in SHIP-TREND. Hazard ratios per standard deviation increase in AI-HF output were 1.67 (1.56-1.79), 1.43 (1.25-1.65), and 1.46 (1.34-1.59), respectively (all <i>P</i> < 0.001). Adding biometric variables improved discrimination modestly (C-indices: 0.714, 0.718, and 0.77).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Across cohorts, AI-HF identified individuals at elevated 5-year incident clinical HF risk using single-lead ECGs. Given the ubiquity of wearables, this method may enable population-scale assessment to support targeted prevention and early intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"7 6","pages":"ztag099"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13326632/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztag099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: Effective heart failure (HF) prevention requires early identification of high-risk individuals, yet population-wide stratification remains difficult. We evaluated whether deep learning using single-lead (lead I) electrocardiograms (ECGs), obtainable from medical systems and wearables, enables population-scale risk assessment. We developed AI-HF to estimate incident clinical HF risk using UK Biobank (UKB) data, validating in the prospective SHIP-START and SHIP-TREND cohorts.
Methods and results: The analysis included 31 740 UKB participants (median age 64, 5.2 year follow-up, 243 events), 3025 SHIP-START participants (age 50, 15 year follow-up, 166 events), and 1342 SHIP-TREND participants (age 51, 9 year follow-up, 84 events). Participants with prevalent HF were excluded. Performance was evaluated at a harmonized 5-year prediction horizon. C-indices for incident clinical HF were 0.693 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.654-0.732] in UKB, 0.715 (0.652-0.777) in SHIP-START, and 0.791 (0.749-0.833) in SHIP-TREND. Hazard ratios per standard deviation increase in AI-HF output were 1.67 (1.56-1.79), 1.43 (1.25-1.65), and 1.46 (1.34-1.59), respectively (all P < 0.001). Adding biometric variables improved discrimination modestly (C-indices: 0.714, 0.718, and 0.77).
Conclusion: Across cohorts, AI-HF identified individuals at elevated 5-year incident clinical HF risk using single-lead ECGs. Given the ubiquity of wearables, this method may enable population-scale assessment to support targeted prevention and early intervention.