Anterior Odontoid Screw Fixation: Current Advances in Indications and Techniques.

Gianpaolo Jannelli, Benedetta Fazzolari, Andrea Brunori, Aria Nouri, Enrico Tessitore, Alberto Delitala
{"title":"Anterior Odontoid Screw Fixation: Current Advances in Indications and Techniques.","authors":"Gianpaolo Jannelli, Benedetta Fazzolari, Andrea Brunori, Aria Nouri, Enrico Tessitore, Alberto Delitala","doi":"10.1007/978-3-032-22008-0_12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Odontoid fractures (OFs) are one of the most common fractures of the upper cervical spine, estimated to represent 9-15% of all cervical fractures. Although their relative frequency, its optimal management is still debated. When surgery is required, anterior odontoid screw fixation (AOSF) offers several advantages, such as preservation of neck rotation, reduced surgical risk, and shorter hospital stay. However, only well-selected patients are eligible for this procedure, and an accurate interpretation of imaging as well as an optimal surgical timing should be taken into account to identify who may be the \"best candidates\".</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The aim of this narrative review is to report the current advances in the treatment of OFs by AOSF. We will focus on surgical details, including minimally invasive surgery, as well as on pre- and postoperative critical aspects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With regard to preoperative imaging, type II b OFs (with fracture line oriented from anterior superior to posterior inferior) typically present favourable configuration to be treated by AOSF. Furthermore, a fracture gap >2 mm, an angulation >11° and a displacement >2 mm as well as timing duration from injury to surgery >7 days are predictors of non-union after AOSF. With regard to surgical technique, compared to traditional open technique, MIS procedures are more and more reported. This approach can be performed percutaneously under fluoroscopy or navigation guidance. Finally, the use of a single, bicortical lag screw is strongly suggested to compress the fractured bone surfaces, to reduce the fracture gap and to obtain the best mechanical stability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our review suggests that AOSF is an effective option in the treatment of type II OFs. However, a meticulous assessment of preoperative images is mandatory, and particular attention has to be paid to fracture configuration, gap, angulation, displacement and ligament integrity. With regard to elderly population, the possibility of wearing rigid collar should be considered, and recent literature reports encouraging results even without any treatment. If a surgical intervention is required, the timing from injury to the operation represents a crucial parameter, making early decisions an important element in the management of type II OFs. Compared to the traditional open approach, minimally invasive AOSF is reliable, promotes faster recovery and in select cases can be performed even under sedation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72077,"journal":{"name":"Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery","volume":"56 ","pages":"269-282"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-22008-0_12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Odontoid fractures (OFs) are one of the most common fractures of the upper cervical spine, estimated to represent 9-15% of all cervical fractures. Although their relative frequency, its optimal management is still debated. When surgery is required, anterior odontoid screw fixation (AOSF) offers several advantages, such as preservation of neck rotation, reduced surgical risk, and shorter hospital stay. However, only well-selected patients are eligible for this procedure, and an accurate interpretation of imaging as well as an optimal surgical timing should be taken into account to identify who may be the "best candidates".

Methods: The aim of this narrative review is to report the current advances in the treatment of OFs by AOSF. We will focus on surgical details, including minimally invasive surgery, as well as on pre- and postoperative critical aspects.

Results: With regard to preoperative imaging, type II b OFs (with fracture line oriented from anterior superior to posterior inferior) typically present favourable configuration to be treated by AOSF. Furthermore, a fracture gap >2 mm, an angulation >11° and a displacement >2 mm as well as timing duration from injury to surgery >7 days are predictors of non-union after AOSF. With regard to surgical technique, compared to traditional open technique, MIS procedures are more and more reported. This approach can be performed percutaneously under fluoroscopy or navigation guidance. Finally, the use of a single, bicortical lag screw is strongly suggested to compress the fractured bone surfaces, to reduce the fracture gap and to obtain the best mechanical stability.

Conclusion: Our review suggests that AOSF is an effective option in the treatment of type II OFs. However, a meticulous assessment of preoperative images is mandatory, and particular attention has to be paid to fracture configuration, gap, angulation, displacement and ligament integrity. With regard to elderly population, the possibility of wearing rigid collar should be considered, and recent literature reports encouraging results even without any treatment. If a surgical intervention is required, the timing from injury to the operation represents a crucial parameter, making early decisions an important element in the management of type II OFs. Compared to the traditional open approach, minimally invasive AOSF is reliable, promotes faster recovery and in select cases can be performed even under sedation.

齿状突前路螺钉固定:适应证和技术的最新进展。
齿状突骨折(OFs)是上颈椎最常见的骨折之一,估计占所有颈椎骨折的9-15%。虽然它们相对频繁,但其最佳管理仍存在争议。当需要手术时,前齿状突螺钉固定(AOSF)有几个优点,如保持颈部旋转,降低手术风险,缩短住院时间。然而,只有经过精心挑选的患者才有资格进行该手术,并且应该考虑到准确的成像解释以及最佳手术时机,以确定谁可能是“最佳候选人”。方法:这篇叙述性综述的目的是报道AOSF治疗OFs的最新进展。我们将专注于手术细节,包括微创手术,以及术前和术后的关键方面。结果:在术前影像学方面,II型b型OFs(骨折线从前上向后下)通常表现出良好的结构,适合AOSF治疗。此外,骨折间隙> 2mm、角度>11°和移位> 2mm以及从受伤到手术的时间>7天是AOSF术后不愈合的预测因素。在手术技术方面,与传统的开放式手术相比,MIS手术的报道越来越多。这种方法可以在透视或导航引导下经皮进行。最后,强烈建议使用单双皮质拉力螺钉来压缩骨折骨面,减少骨折间隙,获得最佳的力学稳定性。结论:我们的综述表明AOSF是治疗II型OFs的有效选择。然而,对术前图像进行细致的评估是必须的,必须特别注意骨折形态、间隙、成角、移位和韧带完整性。对于老年人群,应考虑佩戴硬领的可能性,最近的文献报道了即使不进行任何治疗也有令人鼓舞的结果。如果需要手术干预,从受伤到手术的时间是一个关键参数,在II型OFs的治疗中,早期决策是一个重要因素。与传统的开放入路相比,微创AOSF是可靠的,促进更快的恢复,在某些情况下甚至可以在镇静下进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书