Students' Experiences of Presence and Learning Across Simulated and Virtual Patient Formats: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Hanna Brecheisen, Joy Backhaus, Nina Zerban, Tobias Mühling, Alexander Hann, Sarah König
{"title":"Students' Experiences of Presence and Learning Across Simulated and Virtual Patient Formats: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Hanna Brecheisen, Joy Backhaus, Nina Zerban, Tobias Mühling, Alexander Hann, Sarah König","doi":"10.1177/23821205261446855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While traditional medical education emphasizes real patient interactions, practical and ethical constraints require alternatives, such as simulated patients (SPs) or virtual patients (VPs) in virtual reality. This study investigates medical students' experiential perceptions across different simulation formats within the same undergraduate medical curriculum, using a newly developed modality-spanning questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted with 486 medical students across four curricular courses with differing educational content and objectives (two SP-based and two VP-based courses). A study-specific questionnaire applicable across both simulation formats captured \"experience of presence\" ('embodiment', 'involvement', 'coherence') and \"experience of learning\" ('experience of competence', 'tension', 'acquisition of skills', 'enthusiasm'). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to examine internal structure and psychometric properties of the questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses indicated a stable internal structure with good sampling adequacy (Cronbach's α = 0.82 for \"experience of presence\" and α = 0.66 for \"experience of learning\"). While overall perceived learning did not differ between simulation formats, format-specific experiential profiles emerged. SPs were rated higher for \"experience of presence\", particularly regarding 'involvement' (M = 4.05 vs. 2.62), whereas VPs scored higher for 'coherence' (M = 4.50 vs. 3.98). Within learning-related dimensions, SPs were associated with greater 'tension' (M = 3.57 vs. 2.71) and 'acquisition of skills' (M = 4.66 vs. 4.24), while VPs elicited higher levels of 'enthusiasm' (M = 4.57 vs. 4.03; all p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides insights into how medical students experience presence and learning across different simulation formats within an authentic curricular setting. While SPs appear to foster emotional engagement and perceived skill acquisition, VPs may particularly support spatial orientation and motivational aspects. Applying a single questionnaire across content-diverse courses and modalities may support educators in strategically aligning simulation formats with specific educational objectives and guiding the targeted development of curricula.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"13 ","pages":"23821205261446855"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13323649/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205261446855","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: While traditional medical education emphasizes real patient interactions, practical and ethical constraints require alternatives, such as simulated patients (SPs) or virtual patients (VPs) in virtual reality. This study investigates medical students' experiential perceptions across different simulation formats within the same undergraduate medical curriculum, using a newly developed modality-spanning questionnaire.

Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted with 486 medical students across four curricular courses with differing educational content and objectives (two SP-based and two VP-based courses). A study-specific questionnaire applicable across both simulation formats captured "experience of presence" ('embodiment', 'involvement', 'coherence') and "experience of learning" ('experience of competence', 'tension', 'acquisition of skills', 'enthusiasm'). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to examine internal structure and psychometric properties of the questionnaire.

Results: Analyses indicated a stable internal structure with good sampling adequacy (Cronbach's α = 0.82 for "experience of presence" and α = 0.66 for "experience of learning"). While overall perceived learning did not differ between simulation formats, format-specific experiential profiles emerged. SPs were rated higher for "experience of presence", particularly regarding 'involvement' (M = 4.05 vs. 2.62), whereas VPs scored higher for 'coherence' (M = 4.50 vs. 3.98). Within learning-related dimensions, SPs were associated with greater 'tension' (M = 3.57 vs. 2.71) and 'acquisition of skills' (M = 4.66 vs. 4.24), while VPs elicited higher levels of 'enthusiasm' (M = 4.57 vs. 4.03; all p < 0.001).

Conclusion: This study provides insights into how medical students experience presence and learning across different simulation formats within an authentic curricular setting. While SPs appear to foster emotional engagement and perceived skill acquisition, VPs may particularly support spatial orientation and motivational aspects. Applying a single questionnaire across content-diverse courses and modalities may support educators in strategically aligning simulation formats with specific educational objectives and guiding the targeted development of curricula.

学生在模拟和虚拟病人模式下的存在和学习体验:一项横断面研究。
目的:虽然传统医学教育强调真实的患者互动,但实际和道德约束需要替代方案,例如虚拟现实中的模拟患者(SPs)或虚拟患者(vp)。本研究使用新开发的模态跨越问卷,调查医学生在同一本科医学课程中不同模拟格式的体验感知。方法:采用前瞻性横断面研究方法,对486名医学生进行四门课程(两门以sp为基础的课程和两门以vp为基础的课程)的研究。一份适用于两种模拟格式的研究特定问卷记录了“在场体验”(“体现”、“参与”、“连贯”)和“学习体验”(“能力体验”、“紧张感”、“技能获取”、“热情”)。采用探索性和验证性因子分析来检验问卷的内部结构和心理测量特性。结果:内部结构稳定,抽样充分性好(“存在经验”的Cronbach α = 0.82,“学习经验”的Cronbach α = 0.66)。虽然整体感知学习在模拟格式之间没有差异,但格式特定的经验概况出现了。sp在“在场体验”方面得分更高,特别是在“参与”方面(M = 4.05 vs. 2.62),而vp在“连贯性”方面得分更高(M = 4.50 vs. 3.98)。在与学习相关的维度中,SPs与更大的“紧张”(M = 3.57 vs. 2.71)和“获得技能”(M = 4.66 vs. 4.24)相关,而副总裁引发了更高水平的“热情”(M = 4.57 vs. 4.03;均p < 0.001)。结论:本研究提供了医学生在真实课程设置中如何体验不同模拟格式的存在和学习的见解。虽然sp似乎促进情感投入和感知技能习得,但vp可能特别支持空间定向和动机方面。在内容多样的课程和模式中应用单一问卷可以帮助教育工作者在战略上将模拟格式与特定的教育目标结合起来,并指导有针对性的课程开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书