[A comparative study of four deep learning instance segmentation models for tooth segmentation and tooth numbering identification in intraoral occlusal images].

Q4 Medicine
X Z Liu, X Zhou, L T Yu, Q Chen, L Wu
{"title":"[A comparative study of four deep learning instance segmentation models for tooth segmentation and tooth numbering identification in intraoral occlusal images].","authors":"X Z Liu, X Zhou, L T Yu, Q Chen, L Wu","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20260225-00130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To compare the performance of four deep learning instance segmentation models in tooth contour segmentation and Fédération Dentaire Internationale (FDI) tooth numbering recognition on intraoral occlusal images, and to preliminarily evaluate the clinical acceptability of the best-performing model. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 700 adult participants, comprising 343 males and 357 females aged 35-87 years, including individuals with complete dentition and those with dentition defects, who attended the Department of Prosthodontics, Hospital of Stomatology, China Medical University, between March 2022 and October 2024 and underwent standardized intraoral occlusal photography were enrolled, yielding 1 400 images; after quality screening, 1 300 images from 650 participants were finally included. The dataset was divided by images into a training set (910 images), a validation set (195 images), and a test set (195 images) at a ratio of 7.0∶1.5∶1.5, and only the training set was augmented to 2 730 images. Twenty-eight tooth categories, excluding third molars, were annotated according to the FDI two-digit notation system. Under unified training conditions, four models: Mask R-CNN, RTMDet, YOLOv8-seg, and YOLOv11-seg were compared, and test-set performance was evaluated using segmentation mean average precision at an IoU threshold of 0.5 (seg_mAP@50), precision, recall, and F1-score, while five attending prosthodontists were recruited to compare tooth numbering accuracy with that of the best-performing model and to assess its practical applicability. <b>Results:</b> YOLOv11-seg outperformed the other models across all metrics, achieving a seg_mAP@50 of 98.2%, a precision of 96.3%, a recall of 96.8%, and an F1-score of 96.5%. The tooth numbering accuracy of this model was 97.5% (2 145/2 200), showing no statistically significant difference from the mean accuracy of the five attending prosthodontists (98.6%±1.3%) (<i>t</i>=1.89, <i>P</i>=0.130), and 98.6% of the model outputs were rated as clinically acceptable. <b>Conclusions:</b> YOLOv11-seg achieved highly accurate tooth segmentation and tooth numbering recognition on intraoral occlusal images, with performance comparable to that of attending prosthodontists, thus providing a technical basis for subsequent dentition-defect analysis based on tooth-level information.</p>","PeriodicalId":23965,"journal":{"name":"中华口腔医学杂志","volume":"61 7","pages":"972-978"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华口腔医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20260225-00130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the performance of four deep learning instance segmentation models in tooth contour segmentation and Fédération Dentaire Internationale (FDI) tooth numbering recognition on intraoral occlusal images, and to preliminarily evaluate the clinical acceptability of the best-performing model. Methods: A total of 700 adult participants, comprising 343 males and 357 females aged 35-87 years, including individuals with complete dentition and those with dentition defects, who attended the Department of Prosthodontics, Hospital of Stomatology, China Medical University, between March 2022 and October 2024 and underwent standardized intraoral occlusal photography were enrolled, yielding 1 400 images; after quality screening, 1 300 images from 650 participants were finally included. The dataset was divided by images into a training set (910 images), a validation set (195 images), and a test set (195 images) at a ratio of 7.0∶1.5∶1.5, and only the training set was augmented to 2 730 images. Twenty-eight tooth categories, excluding third molars, were annotated according to the FDI two-digit notation system. Under unified training conditions, four models: Mask R-CNN, RTMDet, YOLOv8-seg, and YOLOv11-seg were compared, and test-set performance was evaluated using segmentation mean average precision at an IoU threshold of 0.5 (seg_mAP@50), precision, recall, and F1-score, while five attending prosthodontists were recruited to compare tooth numbering accuracy with that of the best-performing model and to assess its practical applicability. Results: YOLOv11-seg outperformed the other models across all metrics, achieving a seg_mAP@50 of 98.2%, a precision of 96.3%, a recall of 96.8%, and an F1-score of 96.5%. The tooth numbering accuracy of this model was 97.5% (2 145/2 200), showing no statistically significant difference from the mean accuracy of the five attending prosthodontists (98.6%±1.3%) (t=1.89, P=0.130), and 98.6% of the model outputs were rated as clinically acceptable. Conclusions: YOLOv11-seg achieved highly accurate tooth segmentation and tooth numbering recognition on intraoral occlusal images, with performance comparable to that of attending prosthodontists, thus providing a technical basis for subsequent dentition-defect analysis based on tooth-level information.

[四种深度学习实例分割模型在口腔内咬合图像中牙齿分割和牙齿编号识别的比较研究]。
目的:比较4种深度学习实例分割模型在牙槽内咬合图像的牙齿轮廓分割和外国牙科医生(FDI)牙齿编号识别方面的性能,并初步评价表现最佳的模型的临床可接受性。方法:选取2022年3月至2024年10月在中国医科大学口腔医院口腔修复科接受标准化口腔内咬合摄影的成人受试者700人,其中男性343人,女性357人,年龄35-87岁,包括牙列完整者和牙列缺损者;经过高质量筛选,最终纳入650名参与者的1300张图像。按照7.0∶1.5∶1.5的比例将数据集分成训练集(910张)、验证集(195张)和测试集(195张),仅训练集扩充到2730张。28个牙齿类别,不包括第三磨牙,根据FDI两位数符号系统进行注释。在统一的训练条件下,对Mask R-CNN、RTMDet、YOLOv8-seg、YOLOv11-seg四种模型进行比较,并采用IoU阈值0.5 (seg_mAP@50)下的分割平均精度、精度、召回率、f1评分对测试集性能进行评价,同时招募5名主治义齿医师与表现最好的模型进行牙齿编号精度比较,评估其实际适用性。结果:YOLOv11-seg在所有指标上都优于其他模型,达到seg_mAP@50的98.2%,精度为96.3%,召回率为96.8%,f1得分为96.5%。该模型的牙齿编号准确率为97.5%(2 145/2 200),与5位主治义齿医师的平均准确率(98.6%±1.3%)差异无统计学意义(t=1.89, P=0.130), 98.6%的模型输出被评为临床可接受。结论:YOLOv11-seg在口腔内咬合图像上实现了高度精确的牙齿分割和牙齿编号识别,其性能可与牙科主治医师媲美,为后续基于牙位信息的牙列缺损分析提供了技术依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华口腔医学杂志
中华口腔医学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9692
期刊介绍: Founded in August 1953, Chinese Journal of Stomatology is a monthly academic journal of stomatology published publicly at home and abroad, sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association and co-sponsored by the Chinese Stomatology Association. It mainly reports the leading scientific research results and clinical diagnosis and treatment experience in the field of oral medicine, as well as the basic theoretical research that has a guiding role in oral clinical practice and is closely combined with oral clinical practice. Chinese Journal of Over the years, Stomatology has been published in Medline, Scopus database, Toxicology Abstracts Database, Chemical Abstracts Database, American Cancer database, Russian Abstracts database, China Core Journal of Science and Technology, Peking University Core Journal, CSCD and other more than 20 important journals at home and abroad Physical medicine database and retrieval system included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书