Clinician decision-making in non-functioning pituitary adenomas: an Australian and New Zealand interdisciplinary survey study.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Edward Mignone, Frank Saran, Alkis Psaltis, Alistair Jukes, Ryan Paul, Richard W Carroll, Peter Gorayski, Lauren Cooper, Ian Chapman, David J Torpy, Sunita Mc De Sousa
{"title":"Clinician decision-making in non-functioning pituitary adenomas: an Australian and New Zealand interdisciplinary survey study.","authors":"Edward Mignone, Frank Saran, Alkis Psaltis, Alistair Jukes, Ryan Paul, Richard W Carroll, Peter Gorayski, Lauren Cooper, Ian Chapman, David J Torpy, Sunita Mc De Sousa","doi":"10.1007/s11102-026-01716-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPA) are one of the most frequent pituitary adenoma subtypes, yet dedicated management guidelines do not exist. This study aimed to characterise real-world clinical decision-making across the spectrum of NFPA presentations and to identify areas of practice conformity versus heterogeneity within and between specialty groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, anonymous electronic survey was administered to endocrinologists, neurosurgeons, ENT surgeons, and radiation oncologists involved in pituitary adenoma care in Australia and New Zealand between January and April 2025. Three clinical scenarios were presented: an incidental microadenoma, an incidental asymptomatic macroadenoma, and a symptomatic macroadenoma with visual compromise. Concordance was defined as greater than 70% agreement on a single response within any group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 145 clinicians completed the survey (99 endocrinologists, 31 surgeons, 15 radiation oncologists). Areas of conformity included broad anterior pituitary hormonal evaluation, conservative management of incidental asymptomatic macroadenomas, and active intervention for symptomatic disease with visual loss. Significant heterogeneity was identified in ophthalmological assessment, repeat imaging intervals, post-operative MRI and visual field timing, and multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting referral rates. Compared to general endocrinologists, pituitary subspecialty endocrinologists were significantly more likely to refer patients for MDT discussion and know the caseload of the surgeon to whom they were referring, and less likely to measure serum cortisol immediately post-operatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This survey identifies clinically important variation in NFPA management, concentrated in domains lacking guideline recommendations. These findings highlight the need for dedicated NFPA guidelines spanning the full spectrum of NFPA presentations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20202,"journal":{"name":"Pituitary","volume":"29 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13331897/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pituitary","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-026-01716-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPA) are one of the most frequent pituitary adenoma subtypes, yet dedicated management guidelines do not exist. This study aimed to characterise real-world clinical decision-making across the spectrum of NFPA presentations and to identify areas of practice conformity versus heterogeneity within and between specialty groups.

Methods: A cross-sectional, anonymous electronic survey was administered to endocrinologists, neurosurgeons, ENT surgeons, and radiation oncologists involved in pituitary adenoma care in Australia and New Zealand between January and April 2025. Three clinical scenarios were presented: an incidental microadenoma, an incidental asymptomatic macroadenoma, and a symptomatic macroadenoma with visual compromise. Concordance was defined as greater than 70% agreement on a single response within any group.

Results: A total of 145 clinicians completed the survey (99 endocrinologists, 31 surgeons, 15 radiation oncologists). Areas of conformity included broad anterior pituitary hormonal evaluation, conservative management of incidental asymptomatic macroadenomas, and active intervention for symptomatic disease with visual loss. Significant heterogeneity was identified in ophthalmological assessment, repeat imaging intervals, post-operative MRI and visual field timing, and multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting referral rates. Compared to general endocrinologists, pituitary subspecialty endocrinologists were significantly more likely to refer patients for MDT discussion and know the caseload of the surgeon to whom they were referring, and less likely to measure serum cortisol immediately post-operatively.

Conclusion: This survey identifies clinically important variation in NFPA management, concentrated in domains lacking guideline recommendations. These findings highlight the need for dedicated NFPA guidelines spanning the full spectrum of NFPA presentations.

无功能垂体腺瘤的临床医生决策:澳大利亚和新西兰的跨学科调查研究。
目的:无功能垂体腺瘤(NFPA)是最常见的垂体腺瘤亚型之一,但没有专门的治疗指南。本研究旨在描述NFPA表现范围内的真实临床决策特征,并确定专科组内部和专科组之间的实践一致性与异质性。方法:在2025年1月至4月期间,对澳大利亚和新西兰参与垂体腺瘤治疗的内分泌学家、神经外科医生、耳鼻喉外科医生和放射肿瘤学家进行横断面匿名电子调查。三种临床情况提出:偶发微腺瘤,偶发无症状大腺瘤,和症状大腺瘤视力损害。一致性定义为在任何组内对单个反应的一致性大于70%。结果:共145名临床医生完成调查,其中内分泌科医生99名,外科医生31名,放射肿瘤科医生15名。符合的领域包括广泛的垂体前叶激素评估,偶发无症状大腺瘤的保守治疗,以及对伴有视力丧失的症状性疾病的积极干预。在眼科评估、重复成像间隔、术后MRI和视野时间以及多学科团队(MDT)会议转诊率方面发现了显著的异质性。与普通内分泌学家相比,垂体亚专科内分泌学家更有可能推荐患者进行MDT讨论,并了解他们所推荐的外科医生的病例量,而不太可能在术后立即测量血清皮质醇。结论:该调查确定了NFPA管理的临床重要变化,集中在缺乏指南建议的领域。这些发现强调了制定专门的NFPA指南的必要性,该指南涵盖了NFPA的所有介绍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pituitary
Pituitary 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
7.90%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Pituitary is an international publication devoted to basic and clinical aspects of the pituitary gland. It is designed to publish original, high quality research in both basic and pituitary function as well as clinical pituitary disease. The journal considers: Biology of Pituitary Tumors Mechanisms of Pituitary Hormone Secretion Regulation of Pituitary Function Prospective Clinical Studies of Pituitary Disease Critical Basic and Clinical Reviews Pituitary is directed at basic investigators, physiologists, clinical adult and pediatric endocrinologists, neurosurgeons and reproductive endocrinologists interested in the broad field of the pituitary and its disorders. The Editorial Board has been drawn from international experts in basic and clinical endocrinology. The journal offers a rapid turnaround time for review of manuscripts, and the high standard of the journal is maintained by a selective peer-review process which aims to publish only the highest quality manuscripts. Pituitary will foster the publication of creative scholarship as it pertains to the pituitary and will provide a forum for basic scientists and clinicians to publish their high quality pituitary-related work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书