Sámi psoriatic arthritis patients in northern Norway receive less conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment and have more arthritis, axial symptoms, and joint damage.
N Panagiotopoulos, M I Rosic, A R Broderstad, G Haugeberg, G Ø Eilertsen
{"title":"Sámi psoriatic arthritis patients in northern Norway receive less conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment and have more arthritis, axial symptoms, and joint damage.","authors":"N Panagiotopoulos, M I Rosic, A R Broderstad, G Haugeberg, G Ø Eilertsen","doi":"10.1080/03009742.2026.2687239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare Sámi and non-Sámi patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and evaluate potential differences in treatment and joint damage.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 424 adult PsA patients meeting the ClASsification for Psoriatic ARthritis (CASPAR) criteria were recruited from the Norwegian Arthritis Registry and hospitals in northern Norway. A questionnaire from the SAMINOR (a study in regions with Sámi and Norwegian populations) was used to identify Sámi and non-Sámi patients. Demographic and clinical characteristics, joint damage, and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment data were compared between the groups. Binary logistic regression was used to adjust for age and gender differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty Sámi and 364 non-Sámi patients were identified, and the groups were comparable in demographic characteristics and disease activity measurements. Sámi patients experienced more joint damage than non-Sámi patients (42% vs 26%, p = 0.010), and the highest rate was observed among Sámi men (p = 0.005). Sámi patients also had a higher prevalence of arthritis and axial involvement (92% vs 76%, p = 0.007 vs 32% vs 20%, p = 0.033). In addition, Sámi men showed significant underutilization of conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) (83% vs 92%, p = 0.031), particularly methotrexate (68% vs 90%, p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sámi PsA patients show higher rates of axial involvement, arthritis, and joint damage than their non-Sámi peers. Furthermore, Sámi patients demonstrate underutilization of csDMARDs. These findings underscore the importance of implementing culturally adapted healthcare strategies to improve treatment outcomes for Sámi patients with PsA.</p>","PeriodicalId":21424,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03009742.2026.2687239","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To compare Sámi and non-Sámi patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and evaluate potential differences in treatment and joint damage.
Method: A total of 424 adult PsA patients meeting the ClASsification for Psoriatic ARthritis (CASPAR) criteria were recruited from the Norwegian Arthritis Registry and hospitals in northern Norway. A questionnaire from the SAMINOR (a study in regions with Sámi and Norwegian populations) was used to identify Sámi and non-Sámi patients. Demographic and clinical characteristics, joint damage, and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment data were compared between the groups. Binary logistic regression was used to adjust for age and gender differences.
Results: Sixty Sámi and 364 non-Sámi patients were identified, and the groups were comparable in demographic characteristics and disease activity measurements. Sámi patients experienced more joint damage than non-Sámi patients (42% vs 26%, p = 0.010), and the highest rate was observed among Sámi men (p = 0.005). Sámi patients also had a higher prevalence of arthritis and axial involvement (92% vs 76%, p = 0.007 vs 32% vs 20%, p = 0.033). In addition, Sámi men showed significant underutilization of conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) (83% vs 92%, p = 0.031), particularly methotrexate (68% vs 90%, p = 0.002).
Conclusion: Sámi PsA patients show higher rates of axial involvement, arthritis, and joint damage than their non-Sámi peers. Furthermore, Sámi patients demonstrate underutilization of csDMARDs. These findings underscore the importance of implementing culturally adapted healthcare strategies to improve treatment outcomes for Sámi patients with PsA.
目的:比较Sámi和non-Sámi银屑病关节炎(PsA)患者,并评估治疗和关节损伤的潜在差异。方法:从挪威关节炎登记处和挪威北部的医院招募了424名符合银屑病关节炎分类(CASPAR)标准的成人PsA患者。SAMINOR(在Sámi和挪威人口地区进行的一项研究)的问卷调查用于确定Sámi和non-Sámi患者。比较两组间的人口统计学和临床特征、关节损伤和改善疾病的抗风湿药物治疗数据。采用二元逻辑回归对年龄和性别差异进行校正。结果:确定了60例Sámi和364例non-Sámi患者,两组在人口统计学特征和疾病活动度测量方面具有可比性。Sámi患者比non-Sámi患者有更多的关节损伤(42% vs 26%, p = 0.010), Sámi男性患者的关节损伤率最高(p = 0.005)。Sámi患者也有较高的关节炎患病率和轴向受累(92% vs 76%, p = 0.007 vs 32% vs 20%, p = 0.033)。此外,Sámi男性对常规合成疾病缓解抗风湿药物(csDMARDs)的利用明显不足(83%对92%,p = 0.031),特别是甲氨蝶呤(68%对90%,p = 0.002)。结论:Sámi PsA患者轴向受累、关节炎和关节损伤的发生率高于non-Sámi患者。此外,Sámi患者未充分利用csDMARDs。这些发现强调了实施适应文化的医疗保健策略以改善Sámi PsA患者治疗结果的重要性。
期刊介绍:
Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology is the official journal of the Scandinavian Society for Rheumatology, a non-profit organization following the statutes of the Scandinavian Society for Rheumatology/Scandinavian Research Foundation. The main objective of the Foundation is to support research and promote information and knowledge about rheumatology and related fields. The annual surplus by running the Journal is awarded to young, talented, researchers within the field of rheumatology.pasting
The Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology is an international scientific journal covering clinical and experimental aspects of rheumatic diseases. The journal provides essential reading for rheumatologists as well as general practitioners, orthopaedic surgeons, radiologists, pharmacologists, pathologists and other health professionals with an interest in patients with rheumatic diseases.
The journal publishes original articles as well as reviews, editorials, letters and supplements within the various fields of clinical and experimental rheumatology, including;
Epidemiology
Aetiology and pathogenesis
Treatment and prophylaxis
Laboratory aspects including genetics, biochemistry, immunology, immunopathology, microbiology, histopathology, pathophysiology and pharmacology
Radiological aspects including X-ray, ultrasonography, CT, MRI and other forms of imaging.