Prebiotic xylo-oligosaccharides cause modest taxonomic shifts in the gut microbiota but do not increase insulin sensitivity in insulin resistant individuals.
Anastasiia Driuchina, Jenni Hekkala, Jukka Hintikka, Perttu Permi, Ella Hellsten, Sanna Lensu, Viktor Bielik, Jari Laukkanen, Satu Pekkala
{"title":"Prebiotic xylo-oligosaccharides cause modest taxonomic shifts in the gut microbiota but do not increase insulin sensitivity in insulin resistant individuals.","authors":"Anastasiia Driuchina, Jenni Hekkala, Jukka Hintikka, Perttu Permi, Ella Hellsten, Sanna Lensu, Viktor Bielik, Jari Laukkanen, Satu Pekkala","doi":"10.1186/s12986-026-01168-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Overweight increases the risk of Type 2 Diabetes (T2D), and insulin resistance (IR) precedes development of T2D. Besides lifestyle factors, gut microbes and their metabolites contribute to IR. Gut microbiota could be modulated by probiotics and prebiotics to improve IR, but current research results from interventions are controversial. We aimed at exploring the effects of prebiotic xylo-oligosaccharides (XOS) on the structure and metabolites of gut microbiota, IR, body composition and inflammatory response in humans with overweight.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this within-subjects study design the participants had a 1-month baseline control period without changing their lifestyle and then, they were subjected to 4-months of dietary XOS supplementation. Based on baseline HOMA-IR, we divided study participants into insulin sensitive (< 3, IS, n = 11) and insulin resistant (> 3, IR, n = 38) groups. The gut microbiota were analyzed using 16 S rRNA gene sequencing. Fecal metabolomes were quantified using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR). Additionally, blood clinical variables, serum cytokines, body composition and diet were studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified clear differences between insulin-resistant (IR) and insulin-sensitive (IS) participants in gut microbiome, body composition, and glucose-insulin profiles, along with modest variations in proinflammatory cytokines. Although four months of XOS supplementation did not alter insulin sensitivity or most other measured outcomes, it slightly reduced the levels of total cholesterol and increased HDL cholesterol in IR participants. However, it should be noted that during control period HDL first decreased in that group. Interestingly, XOS treatment decreased fecal galactose, isobutyrate, and isovalerate levels in IS participants, whereas shifts in microbial abundances (20 different microbial taxa) were observed only in IR participants with no changes in diversity. Isobutyrate, isovalerate and phenylacetate levels were lower in the IR group at baseline compared to IS. Across the study from baseline to post-treatment, body weight and BMI declined in IR individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>XOS supplementation altered gut microbiota composition in IR participants, while changing fecal metabolome in IS participants. XOS modestly improved lipid parameters, such as HDL cholesterol, but did not improve insulin sensitivity, body composition, or inflammatory markers. More and larger studies are needed to show that prebiotic XOS can consistently improve insulin sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was retrospectively registered at ISRCTN under the number ISRCTN86495943.</p>","PeriodicalId":19196,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13621562/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12986-026-01168-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Overweight increases the risk of Type 2 Diabetes (T2D), and insulin resistance (IR) precedes development of T2D. Besides lifestyle factors, gut microbes and their metabolites contribute to IR. Gut microbiota could be modulated by probiotics and prebiotics to improve IR, but current research results from interventions are controversial. We aimed at exploring the effects of prebiotic xylo-oligosaccharides (XOS) on the structure and metabolites of gut microbiota, IR, body composition and inflammatory response in humans with overweight.
Methods: In this within-subjects study design the participants had a 1-month baseline control period without changing their lifestyle and then, they were subjected to 4-months of dietary XOS supplementation. Based on baseline HOMA-IR, we divided study participants into insulin sensitive (< 3, IS, n = 11) and insulin resistant (> 3, IR, n = 38) groups. The gut microbiota were analyzed using 16 S rRNA gene sequencing. Fecal metabolomes were quantified using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR). Additionally, blood clinical variables, serum cytokines, body composition and diet were studied.
Results: We identified clear differences between insulin-resistant (IR) and insulin-sensitive (IS) participants in gut microbiome, body composition, and glucose-insulin profiles, along with modest variations in proinflammatory cytokines. Although four months of XOS supplementation did not alter insulin sensitivity or most other measured outcomes, it slightly reduced the levels of total cholesterol and increased HDL cholesterol in IR participants. However, it should be noted that during control period HDL first decreased in that group. Interestingly, XOS treatment decreased fecal galactose, isobutyrate, and isovalerate levels in IS participants, whereas shifts in microbial abundances (20 different microbial taxa) were observed only in IR participants with no changes in diversity. Isobutyrate, isovalerate and phenylacetate levels were lower in the IR group at baseline compared to IS. Across the study from baseline to post-treatment, body weight and BMI declined in IR individuals.
Conclusions: XOS supplementation altered gut microbiota composition in IR participants, while changing fecal metabolome in IS participants. XOS modestly improved lipid parameters, such as HDL cholesterol, but did not improve insulin sensitivity, body composition, or inflammatory markers. More and larger studies are needed to show that prebiotic XOS can consistently improve insulin sensitivity.
Trial registration: The study was retrospectively registered at ISRCTN under the number ISRCTN86495943.
背景:超重增加2型糖尿病(T2D)的风险,而胰岛素抵抗(IR)先于T2D的发展。除了生活方式因素外,肠道微生物及其代谢物也会导致IR。益生菌和益生元可以调节肠道菌群以改善IR,但目前的研究结果存在争议。我们旨在探讨益生元低聚木糖(XOS)对超重人群肠道微生物群结构和代谢产物、IR、身体成分和炎症反应的影响。方法:在受试者内研究设计中,参与者有1个月的基线对照期,没有改变他们的生活方式,然后他们进行了4个月的饮食补充XOS。基于基线HOMA-IR,我们将研究参与者分为胰岛素敏感组(3人,IR, n = 38)。采用16s rRNA基因测序分析肠道菌群。采用核磁共振光谱(NMR)对粪便代谢组进行定量分析。此外,还研究了血液临床指标、血清细胞因子、体成分和饮食。结果:我们确定了胰岛素抵抗(IR)和胰岛素敏感(IS)参与者在肠道微生物组、身体组成和葡萄糖-胰岛素谱方面的明显差异,以及促炎细胞因子的适度变化。虽然四个月的XOS补充没有改变胰岛素敏感性或大多数其他测量结果,但它略微降低了IR参与者的总胆固醇水平并增加了高密度脂蛋白胆固醇。然而,应该注意的是,在对照组期间,该组HDL首先下降。有趣的是,XOS治疗降低了IS参与者的粪便半乳糖、异丁酸和异戊酸水平,而微生物丰度(20种不同的微生物分类群)的变化仅在IR参与者中观察到,多样性没有变化。与IS组相比,IR组在基线时异丁酸、异戊酸和苯乙酸水平较低。在整个研究过程中,从基线到治疗后,IR个体的体重和BMI都有所下降。结论:补充XOS改变了IR参与者的肠道菌群组成,同时改变了IS参与者的粪便代谢组。XOS适度改善脂质参数,如HDL胆固醇,但没有改善胰岛素敏感性、身体成分或炎症标志物。需要更多更大规模的研究来证明益生元XOS可以持续改善胰岛素敏感性。试验注册:该研究在ISRCTN回顾性注册,编号为ISRCTN86495943。
期刊介绍:
Nutrition & Metabolism publishes studies with a clear focus on nutrition and metabolism with applications ranging from nutrition needs, exercise physiology, clinical and population studies, as well as the underlying mechanisms in these aspects.
The areas of interest for Nutrition & Metabolism encompass studies in molecular nutrition in the context of obesity, diabetes, lipedemias, metabolic syndrome and exercise physiology. Manuscripts related to molecular, cellular and human metabolism, nutrient sensing and nutrient–gene interactions are also in interest, as are submissions that have employed new and innovative strategies like metabolomics/lipidomics or other omic-based biomarkers to predict nutritional status and metabolic diseases.
Key areas we wish to encourage submissions from include:
-how diet and specific nutrients interact with genes, proteins or metabolites to influence metabolic phenotypes and disease outcomes;
-the role of epigenetic factors and the microbiome in the pathogenesis of metabolic diseases and their influence on metabolic responses to diet and food components;
-how diet and other environmental factors affect epigenetics and microbiota; the extent to which genetic and nongenetic factors modify personal metabolic responses to diet and food compositions and the mechanisms involved;
-how specific biologic networks and nutrient sensing mechanisms attribute to metabolic variability.