Mechanism-guided biomaterial strategies for intervertebral disc degeneration: Pathological heterogeneity, functional classification, and translational perspectives.

IF 10.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Journal of Tissue Engineering Pub Date : 2026-07-01 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20417314261464764
Jianpeng Chen, Wenhao Deng, Shiran Zhou, Jun Yan, Kai Chen, Qianliang Wang, Shujun Lv
{"title":"Mechanism-guided biomaterial strategies for intervertebral disc degeneration: Pathological heterogeneity, functional classification, and translational perspectives.","authors":"Jianpeng Chen, Wenhao Deng, Shiran Zhou, Jun Yan, Kai Chen, Qianliang Wang, Shujun Lv","doi":"10.1177/20417314261464764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) is a multifactorial and clinically heterogeneous condition involving disturbances in oxidative balance, mitochondrial homeostasis, inflammatory signaling, susceptibility to regulated cell death, extracellular matrix integrity, and biomechanical function. Although biomaterial-based strategies have shown significant promise in preclinical studies, their clinical translation remains hindered by pathological heterogeneity, insufficient mechanistic validation, and frequent reliance on simplified experimental models. These models often fail to fully replicate the chronic, mechanically complex, and clinically diverse nature of human disc degeneration. In addition, current biomaterial strategies are commonly classified according to material composition or isolated molecular targets, potentially obscuring their functional objectives and limiting mechanistic comparisons across therapeutic platforms. This review presents a mechanism-guided framework for interpreting biomaterial interventions in IVDD. Biomaterial strategies are discussed based on their primary pathological targets and therapeutic intentions, including inflammatory regulation, restoration of redox homeostasis, mitochondrial protection, ferroptosis modulation, extracellular matrix preservation, and multifunctional microenvironment-responsive interventions. This framework acknowledges that these pathological processes are interconnected and vary in their relative dominance across clinical and pathological contexts and patient populations. We further analyze current biomaterial strategies according to mechanistic intervention layers, including upstream sensing and initiation-level control, restraint of intracellular amplification, organelle stabilization, regulation of execution checkpoints, and integration with higher-order structural organization. This layered perspective emphasizes that the efficacy of biomaterials depends not only on their composition but also on the pathological context, depth of regulatory influence, mechanistic specificity, and compatibility across intervention layers. Collectively, this review provides an integrated, mechanism-oriented framework for biomaterial design, preclinical evaluation, and translational development in IVDD therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tissue Engineering","volume":"17 ","pages":"20417314261464764"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13323677/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tissue Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20417314261464764","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) is a multifactorial and clinically heterogeneous condition involving disturbances in oxidative balance, mitochondrial homeostasis, inflammatory signaling, susceptibility to regulated cell death, extracellular matrix integrity, and biomechanical function. Although biomaterial-based strategies have shown significant promise in preclinical studies, their clinical translation remains hindered by pathological heterogeneity, insufficient mechanistic validation, and frequent reliance on simplified experimental models. These models often fail to fully replicate the chronic, mechanically complex, and clinically diverse nature of human disc degeneration. In addition, current biomaterial strategies are commonly classified according to material composition or isolated molecular targets, potentially obscuring their functional objectives and limiting mechanistic comparisons across therapeutic platforms. This review presents a mechanism-guided framework for interpreting biomaterial interventions in IVDD. Biomaterial strategies are discussed based on their primary pathological targets and therapeutic intentions, including inflammatory regulation, restoration of redox homeostasis, mitochondrial protection, ferroptosis modulation, extracellular matrix preservation, and multifunctional microenvironment-responsive interventions. This framework acknowledges that these pathological processes are interconnected and vary in their relative dominance across clinical and pathological contexts and patient populations. We further analyze current biomaterial strategies according to mechanistic intervention layers, including upstream sensing and initiation-level control, restraint of intracellular amplification, organelle stabilization, regulation of execution checkpoints, and integration with higher-order structural organization. This layered perspective emphasizes that the efficacy of biomaterials depends not only on their composition but also on the pathological context, depth of regulatory influence, mechanistic specificity, and compatibility across intervention layers. Collectively, this review provides an integrated, mechanism-oriented framework for biomaterial design, preclinical evaluation, and translational development in IVDD therapy.

机制导向的椎间盘退变生物材料策略:病理异质性、功能分类和翻译观点。
椎间盘退变(IVDD)是一种多因素和临床异质性疾病,涉及氧化平衡、线粒体稳态、炎症信号、细胞死亡易感性、细胞外基质完整性和生物力学功能紊乱。尽管基于生物材料的策略在临床前研究中显示出巨大的前景,但它们的临床转化仍然受到病理异质性、机制验证不足以及频繁依赖简化的实验模型的阻碍。这些模型往往不能完全复制人类椎间盘退变的慢性、机械复杂性和临床多样性。此外,目前的生物材料策略通常根据材料组成或分离的分子靶点进行分类,这可能模糊了它们的功能目标,并限制了跨治疗平台的机制比较。这篇综述提出了一个解释IVDD中生物材料干预的机制指导框架。生物材料策略基于其主要病理目标和治疗目的进行讨论,包括炎症调节,氧化还原稳态恢复,线粒体保护,铁凋亡调节,细胞外基质保存和多功能微环境响应干预。该框架承认这些病理过程是相互关联的,并且在临床和病理背景以及患者群体中其相对优势各不相同。我们进一步根据机制干预层分析了当前生物材料的策略,包括上游传感和启动水平控制、细胞内扩增的抑制、细胞器的稳定、执行检查点的调节以及与高阶结构组织的整合。这种分层视角强调,生物材料的功效不仅取决于其组成,还取决于病理背景、调控影响的深度、机制特异性和跨干预层的相容性。总之,这篇综述为IVDD治疗的生物材料设计、临床前评估和转化开发提供了一个完整的、以机制为导向的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Tissue Engineering
Journal of Tissue Engineering Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
52
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Tissue Engineering (JTE) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal dedicated to scientific research in the field of tissue engineering and its clinical applications. Our journal encompasses a wide range of interests, from the fundamental aspects of stem cells and progenitor cells, including their expansion to viable numbers, to an in-depth understanding of their differentiation processes. Join us in exploring the latest advancements in tissue engineering and its clinical translation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书