Alterations in cognitive function among reproductive-age women with polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 5 4区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Samantha Rogers, Bailey Milne, Jennifer Carpenter
{"title":"Alterations in cognitive function among reproductive-age women with polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Samantha Rogers,&nbsp;Bailey Milne,&nbsp;Jennifer Carpenter","doi":"10.1111/jne.70225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome (PMOS) is a common endocrine disorder affecting 1.55 million women of reproductive age worldwide. While its physical and reproductive impacts are well-documented, the cognitive effects of PMOS remain under-researched and poorly understood. This systematic review aims to investigate existing literature on cognitive function in women with PMOS. The objective of this review is to identify specific cognitive differences between women with PMOS and those without, highlight gaps in current research and clinical care, and inform the development of more comprehensive care frameworks for individuals with PMOS. A systematic search was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) for studies published up to June 23, 2025. Eligible studies underwent data extraction and risk of bias assessment in accordance with standard systematic review protocols. Out of 2887 articles screened, 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-two studies involving 136,008 women with PMOS and 333,895 without PMOS were included. Across cognitive domains, pooled correlations generally indicated small, non-significant negative associations, including executive function (<i>r</i> = −0.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] –0.26 to 0.02), attention (<i>r</i> = −0.13, 95% CI –0.38 to 0.14), and working memory (<i>r</i> = −0.14, 95% CI –0.31 to 0.05). Substantial heterogeneity was observed in several domains, often driven by individual outlying studies. Risk of bias was generally low, and funnel plots with Egger's regression provided no evidence of publication bias. This review underscores the need for further research into the cognitive aspects of PMOS. Addressing this gap is essential for developing a more comprehensive approach to PMOS treatment and support beyond its traditional focus on physical and reproductive health.</p>","PeriodicalId":16535,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroendocrinology","volume":"38 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jne.70225","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroendocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jne.70225","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome (PMOS) is a common endocrine disorder affecting 1.55 million women of reproductive age worldwide. While its physical and reproductive impacts are well-documented, the cognitive effects of PMOS remain under-researched and poorly understood. This systematic review aims to investigate existing literature on cognitive function in women with PMOS. The objective of this review is to identify specific cognitive differences between women with PMOS and those without, highlight gaps in current research and clinical care, and inform the development of more comprehensive care frameworks for individuals with PMOS. A systematic search was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) for studies published up to June 23, 2025. Eligible studies underwent data extraction and risk of bias assessment in accordance with standard systematic review protocols. Out of 2887 articles screened, 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-two studies involving 136,008 women with PMOS and 333,895 without PMOS were included. Across cognitive domains, pooled correlations generally indicated small, non-significant negative associations, including executive function (r = −0.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] –0.26 to 0.02), attention (r = −0.13, 95% CI –0.38 to 0.14), and working memory (r = −0.14, 95% CI –0.31 to 0.05). Substantial heterogeneity was observed in several domains, often driven by individual outlying studies. Risk of bias was generally low, and funnel plots with Egger's regression provided no evidence of publication bias. This review underscores the need for further research into the cognitive aspects of PMOS. Addressing this gap is essential for developing a more comprehensive approach to PMOS treatment and support beyond its traditional focus on physical and reproductive health.

Abstract Image

多内分泌代谢性卵巢综合征育龄妇女认知功能的改变:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
卵巢多内分泌代谢综合征(PMOS)是一种常见的内分泌疾病,影响全球155万育龄妇女。虽然经前症候群对身体和生殖的影响有充分的文献记载,但其对认知的影响仍未得到充分的研究和理解。本系统综述旨在对经前症候群女性认知功能的现有文献进行研究。本综述的目的是确定PMOS患者与非PMOS患者之间的特定认知差异,突出当前研究和临床护理中的差距,并为PMOS患者制定更全面的护理框架提供信息。使用Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid EMBASE和CINAHL(护理和相关健康文献累积索引)对截至2025年6月23日发表的研究进行了系统检索。符合条件的研究按照标准的系统评价方案进行数据提取和偏倚风险评估。在筛选的2887篇文章中,有22篇研究符合纳入标准。22项研究包括136,008名PMOS患者和333,895名非PMOS患者。在认知领域,汇总相关性通常表明小的、不显著的负相关,包括执行功能(r = -0.12, 95%可信区间[CI] -0.26至0.02)、注意力(r = -0.13, 95% CI -0.38至0.14)和工作记忆(r = -0.14, 95% CI -0.31至0.05)。在几个领域观察到实质性的异质性,通常是由个别的外围研究驱动的。偏倚风险普遍较低,Egger回归的漏斗图没有提供发表偏倚的证据。这一综述强调了对PMOS认知方面的进一步研究的必要性。解决这一差距对于制定一种更全面的方法来治疗和支持经前期综合症至关重要,而不是传统上以身体和生殖健康为重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroendocrinology
Journal of Neuroendocrinology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
137
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Neuroendocrinology provides the principal international focus for the newest ideas in classical neuroendocrinology and its expanding interface with the regulation of behavioural, cognitive, developmental, degenerative and metabolic processes. Through the rapid publication of original manuscripts and provocative review articles, it provides essential reading for basic scientists and clinicians researching in this rapidly expanding field. In determining content, the primary considerations are excellence, relevance and novelty. While Journal of Neuroendocrinology reflects the broad scientific and clinical interests of the BSN membership, the editorial team, led by Professor Julian Mercer, ensures that the journal’s ethos, authorship, content and purpose are those expected of a leading international publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书