Compliance With NICE Guidance for Cervical Spine Trauma Imaging: A Single Centre Retrospective Evaluation.

IF 2.1 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Nikoll Walker, Jas Sawhney, Beverly Snaith
{"title":"Compliance With NICE Guidance for Cervical Spine Trauma Imaging: A Single Centre Retrospective Evaluation.","authors":"Nikoll Walker, Jas Sawhney, Beverly Snaith","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.70105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 2016 the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) published guidance in England recommending computed tomography (CT) as the first line imaging for cervical spine (C-spine) injury in adults. However anecdotal evidence suggests that X-rays are still being performed. The aim of this evaluation was to determine the imaging referral patterns following C-spine trauma and compare with national guidance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Within a single English organisation emergency department patient attendance data, X-ray and CT referral criteria and acquisition information for patients ≥ 16 years undergoing imaging of the C-spine was collated from a 12-month period (01.01.23-31.12.23).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort contained 302 females and 301 males, with a median age of 55 years. According to the clinical information 12.1% (n = 73/603) of the patients had no risk of C-spine injury and therefore should not have required diagnostic imaging. Almost two thirds of patients (n = 395/603; 65.5%) had first line CT imaging consistent with national guidance. Of those where imaging was justified, 135 patients had the incorrect initial diagnostic test (X-ray as opposed to CT) with 26 also having a subsequent CT. The quality of all of the X-rays were reviewed and only 39.5% (n = 73/185) of cases were diagnostic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In 2023, the organisation was 65.5% compliant with the guidance, with a number of patients referred for unjustified imaging examinations and/or the wrong initial imaging modality. The consequences of this included treatment delays, prolonged immobilisation, over-irradiation and impact upon resources, along with potentially missed pathology due to inconclusive X-rays.</p>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13398799/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.70105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In 2016 the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) published guidance in England recommending computed tomography (CT) as the first line imaging for cervical spine (C-spine) injury in adults. However anecdotal evidence suggests that X-rays are still being performed. The aim of this evaluation was to determine the imaging referral patterns following C-spine trauma and compare with national guidance.

Methods: Within a single English organisation emergency department patient attendance data, X-ray and CT referral criteria and acquisition information for patients ≥ 16 years undergoing imaging of the C-spine was collated from a 12-month period (01.01.23-31.12.23).

Results: The cohort contained 302 females and 301 males, with a median age of 55 years. According to the clinical information 12.1% (n = 73/603) of the patients had no risk of C-spine injury and therefore should not have required diagnostic imaging. Almost two thirds of patients (n = 395/603; 65.5%) had first line CT imaging consistent with national guidance. Of those where imaging was justified, 135 patients had the incorrect initial diagnostic test (X-ray as opposed to CT) with 26 also having a subsequent CT. The quality of all of the X-rays were reviewed and only 39.5% (n = 73/185) of cases were diagnostic.

Conclusions: In 2023, the organisation was 65.5% compliant with the guidance, with a number of patients referred for unjustified imaging examinations and/or the wrong initial imaging modality. The consequences of this included treatment delays, prolonged immobilisation, over-irradiation and impact upon resources, along with potentially missed pathology due to inconclusive X-rays.

依从NICE颈椎创伤成像指南:单中心回顾性评价。
2016年,英国国家健康与护理卓越研究所(NICE)在英国发布了指南,推荐计算机断层扫描(CT)作为成人颈椎(C-spine)损伤的一线成像。然而,坊间证据表明,人们仍在进行x光检查。本评估的目的是确定颈椎外伤后的影像学转诊模式,并与国家指南进行比较。方法:在一个英国机构内,整理了12个月(01.1.23 -31.12.23)的急诊就诊数据、≥16岁的c -脊柱影像学患者的x线和CT转诊标准和获取信息。结果:该队列包括302名女性和301名男性,中位年龄为55岁。根据临床资料,12.1% (n = 73/603)的患者不存在颈椎损伤的风险,因此不需要进行诊断性影像学检查。几乎三分之二的患者(n = 395/603; 65.5%)进行了符合国家指导的一线CT成像。在那些需要进行影像学检查的患者中,135名患者的初始诊断测试(x射线与CT相反)不正确,26名患者随后又进行了CT检查。对所有x线片的质量进行了检查,诊断率仅为39.5% (n = 73/185)。结论:2023年,该组织65.5%的患者符合指南,有许多患者转诊进行了不合理的影像学检查和/或错误的初始影像学方式。其后果包括治疗延误、长时间固定、过度照射和对资源的影响,以及由于x射线不确定而可能遗漏的病理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
69
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences (JMRS) is an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal that accepts manuscripts related to medical imaging / diagnostic radiography, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, medical ultrasound / sonography, and the complementary disciplines of medical physics, radiology, radiation oncology, nursing, psychology and sociology. Manuscripts may take the form of: original articles, review articles, commentary articles, technical evaluations, case series and case studies. JMRS promotes excellence in international medical radiation science by the publication of contemporary and advanced research that encourages the adoption of the best clinical, scientific and educational practices in international communities. JMRS is the official professional journal of the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) and the New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology (NZIMRT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书