Sunaina T Karna, Manvinder Tejpal, Pooja Singh, Amit Agrawal, Virendra K Verma, Rehan Ul Haq
{"title":"Viscoelastic Hemostatic Assays in Spine Surgery: A Scoping Review of Perioperative Transfusion Practices and Coagulation Assessment.","authors":"Sunaina T Karna, Manvinder Tejpal, Pooja Singh, Amit Agrawal, Virendra K Verma, Rehan Ul Haq","doi":"10.1097/ANA.0000000000001147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Major spine surgery is associated with substantial blood loss and dynamic perioperative coagulation disturbances. Conventional coagulation tests may not adequately assess whole-blood clot formation, platelet contribution, or fibrinolysis. Viscoelastic hemostatic assays (VHAs), including thromboelastography and rotational thromboelastometry, have been explored for point-of-care coagulation assessment in spine surgery. This scoping review systematically mapped the literature evaluating VHA-guided transfusion practices and perioperative coagulation assessment in spine surgery, focusing on devices used, timing of testing, and reported clinical outcomes. The primary objective was evidence mapping rather than quantitative effect estimation or meta-analysis. The review followed a Population-Concept-Context framework and was reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Electronic databases and gray literature were searched from inception to August 29, 2025. Eligible studies included patients undergoing spine surgery in whom VHAs were used perioperatively, evaluating system-level outcomes (devices, timing, algorithms, cost-effectiveness) and clinical outcomes (blood loss, transfusion composition and volume, pharmacotherapy, hypercoagulability, and hospital length of stay). Twenty-one studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 3 randomized controlled trials, 9 prospective observational studies, 8 retrospective cohort studies, and 1 case-control study. Most studies were observational with marked heterogeneity in design, patient populations, and surgical settings. Several studies reported targeted blood product administration with VHA-guided management. Evidence regarding reductions in blood loss and hospital stay was inconsistent, while data on hypercoagulability, thromboembolic events, and cost-effectiveness were limited. Though studies suggest that VHA may guide patient blood management in spine surgery, the evidence is predominantly observational, limiting causal inference and underscoring the need for well-designed, spine-specific studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000001147","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Major spine surgery is associated with substantial blood loss and dynamic perioperative coagulation disturbances. Conventional coagulation tests may not adequately assess whole-blood clot formation, platelet contribution, or fibrinolysis. Viscoelastic hemostatic assays (VHAs), including thromboelastography and rotational thromboelastometry, have been explored for point-of-care coagulation assessment in spine surgery. This scoping review systematically mapped the literature evaluating VHA-guided transfusion practices and perioperative coagulation assessment in spine surgery, focusing on devices used, timing of testing, and reported clinical outcomes. The primary objective was evidence mapping rather than quantitative effect estimation or meta-analysis. The review followed a Population-Concept-Context framework and was reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Electronic databases and gray literature were searched from inception to August 29, 2025. Eligible studies included patients undergoing spine surgery in whom VHAs were used perioperatively, evaluating system-level outcomes (devices, timing, algorithms, cost-effectiveness) and clinical outcomes (blood loss, transfusion composition and volume, pharmacotherapy, hypercoagulability, and hospital length of stay). Twenty-one studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 3 randomized controlled trials, 9 prospective observational studies, 8 retrospective cohort studies, and 1 case-control study. Most studies were observational with marked heterogeneity in design, patient populations, and surgical settings. Several studies reported targeted blood product administration with VHA-guided management. Evidence regarding reductions in blood loss and hospital stay was inconsistent, while data on hypercoagulability, thromboembolic events, and cost-effectiveness were limited. Though studies suggest that VHA may guide patient blood management in spine surgery, the evidence is predominantly observational, limiting causal inference and underscoring the need for well-designed, spine-specific studies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology (JNA) is a peer-reviewed publication directed to an audience of neuroanesthesiologists, neurosurgeons, neurosurgical monitoring specialists, neurosurgical support staff, and Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit personnel. The journal publishes original peer-reviewed studies in the form of Clinical Investigations, Laboratory Investigations, Clinical Reports, Review Articles, Journal Club synopses of current literature from related journals, presentation of Points of View on controversial issues, Book Reviews, Correspondence, and Abstracts from affiliated neuroanesthesiology societies.
JNA is the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care, the Neuroanaesthesia and Critical Care Society of Great Britain and Ireland, the Association de Neuro-Anesthésiologie Réanimation de langue Française, the Wissenschaftlicher Arbeitskreis Neuroanästhesie der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizen, the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutschsprachiger Neuroanästhesisten und Neuro-Intensivmediziner, the Korean Society of Neuroanesthesia, the Japanese Society of Neuroanesthesia and Critical Care, the Neuroanesthesiology Chapter of the Colegio Mexicano de Anesthesiología, the Indian Society of Neuroanesthesiology and Critical Care, and the Thai Society for Neuroanesthesia.