Viscoelastic Hemostatic Assays in Spine Surgery: A Scoping Review of Perioperative Transfusion Practices and Coagulation Assessment.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Sunaina T Karna, Manvinder Tejpal, Pooja Singh, Amit Agrawal, Virendra K Verma, Rehan Ul Haq
{"title":"Viscoelastic Hemostatic Assays in Spine Surgery: A Scoping Review of Perioperative Transfusion Practices and Coagulation Assessment.","authors":"Sunaina T Karna, Manvinder Tejpal, Pooja Singh, Amit Agrawal, Virendra K Verma, Rehan Ul Haq","doi":"10.1097/ANA.0000000000001147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Major spine surgery is associated with substantial blood loss and dynamic perioperative coagulation disturbances. Conventional coagulation tests may not adequately assess whole-blood clot formation, platelet contribution, or fibrinolysis. Viscoelastic hemostatic assays (VHAs), including thromboelastography and rotational thromboelastometry, have been explored for point-of-care coagulation assessment in spine surgery. This scoping review systematically mapped the literature evaluating VHA-guided transfusion practices and perioperative coagulation assessment in spine surgery, focusing on devices used, timing of testing, and reported clinical outcomes. The primary objective was evidence mapping rather than quantitative effect estimation or meta-analysis. The review followed a Population-Concept-Context framework and was reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Electronic databases and gray literature were searched from inception to August 29, 2025. Eligible studies included patients undergoing spine surgery in whom VHAs were used perioperatively, evaluating system-level outcomes (devices, timing, algorithms, cost-effectiveness) and clinical outcomes (blood loss, transfusion composition and volume, pharmacotherapy, hypercoagulability, and hospital length of stay). Twenty-one studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 3 randomized controlled trials, 9 prospective observational studies, 8 retrospective cohort studies, and 1 case-control study. Most studies were observational with marked heterogeneity in design, patient populations, and surgical settings. Several studies reported targeted blood product administration with VHA-guided management. Evidence regarding reductions in blood loss and hospital stay was inconsistent, while data on hypercoagulability, thromboembolic events, and cost-effectiveness were limited. Though studies suggest that VHA may guide patient blood management in spine surgery, the evidence is predominantly observational, limiting causal inference and underscoring the need for well-designed, spine-specific studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000001147","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Major spine surgery is associated with substantial blood loss and dynamic perioperative coagulation disturbances. Conventional coagulation tests may not adequately assess whole-blood clot formation, platelet contribution, or fibrinolysis. Viscoelastic hemostatic assays (VHAs), including thromboelastography and rotational thromboelastometry, have been explored for point-of-care coagulation assessment in spine surgery. This scoping review systematically mapped the literature evaluating VHA-guided transfusion practices and perioperative coagulation assessment in spine surgery, focusing on devices used, timing of testing, and reported clinical outcomes. The primary objective was evidence mapping rather than quantitative effect estimation or meta-analysis. The review followed a Population-Concept-Context framework and was reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Electronic databases and gray literature were searched from inception to August 29, 2025. Eligible studies included patients undergoing spine surgery in whom VHAs were used perioperatively, evaluating system-level outcomes (devices, timing, algorithms, cost-effectiveness) and clinical outcomes (blood loss, transfusion composition and volume, pharmacotherapy, hypercoagulability, and hospital length of stay). Twenty-one studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 3 randomized controlled trials, 9 prospective observational studies, 8 retrospective cohort studies, and 1 case-control study. Most studies were observational with marked heterogeneity in design, patient populations, and surgical settings. Several studies reported targeted blood product administration with VHA-guided management. Evidence regarding reductions in blood loss and hospital stay was inconsistent, while data on hypercoagulability, thromboembolic events, and cost-effectiveness were limited. Though studies suggest that VHA may guide patient blood management in spine surgery, the evidence is predominantly observational, limiting causal inference and underscoring the need for well-designed, spine-specific studies.

脊柱外科粘弹性止血试验:围手术期输血实践和凝血评估的范围回顾。
大脊柱手术与大量失血和动态围手术期凝血障碍有关。常规凝血试验可能不能充分评估全血凝块形成、血小板贡献或纤维蛋白溶解。粘弹性止血试验(VHAs),包括血栓弹性成像和旋转血栓弹性测量,已经探索了在脊柱外科护理点凝血评估。本综述系统地回顾了评估vha指导的输血实践和脊柱外科围手术期凝血评估的文献,重点关注使用的设备、测试时间和报告的临床结果。主要目标是证据映射,而不是定量效应估计或荟萃分析。审查遵循人口-概念-环境框架,并根据PRISMA-ScR指南进行报告。从开始到2025年8月29日,检索了电子数据库和灰色文献。符合条件的研究包括围手术期使用vha的脊柱手术患者,评估系统水平的结果(设备、时间、算法、成本效益)和临床结果(出血量、输血成分和输血量、药物治疗、高凝性和住院时间)。21项研究符合纳入标准,包括3项随机对照试验、9项前瞻性观察性研究、8项回顾性队列研究和1项病例对照研究。大多数研究是观察性的,在设计、患者群体和手术环境方面具有明显的异质性。几项研究报道了vha指导下的靶向血液制品管理。关于减少失血量和住院时间的证据不一致,而关于高凝性、血栓栓塞事件和成本效益的数据有限。尽管研究表明VHA可以指导脊柱外科患者的血液管理,但证据主要是观察性的,限制了因果推理,并强调需要精心设计的脊柱特异性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.80%
发文量
119
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology (JNA) is a peer-reviewed publication directed to an audience of neuroanesthesiologists, neurosurgeons, neurosurgical monitoring specialists, neurosurgical support staff, and Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit personnel. The journal publishes original peer-reviewed studies in the form of Clinical Investigations, Laboratory Investigations, Clinical Reports, Review Articles, Journal Club synopses of current literature from related journals, presentation of Points of View on controversial issues, Book Reviews, Correspondence, and Abstracts from affiliated neuroanesthesiology societies. JNA is the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care, the Neuroanaesthesia and Critical Care Society of Great Britain and Ireland, the Association de Neuro-Anesthésiologie Réanimation de langue Française, the Wissenschaftlicher Arbeitskreis Neuroanästhesie der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizen, the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutschsprachiger Neuroanästhesisten und Neuro-Intensivmediziner, the Korean Society of Neuroanesthesia, the Japanese Society of Neuroanesthesia and Critical Care, the Neuroanesthesiology Chapter of the Colegio Mexicano de Anesthesiología, the Indian Society of Neuroanesthesiology and Critical Care, and the Thai Society for Neuroanesthesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书