{"title":"Contemporary perceptions of ginseng among individuals with health needs: A nationwide questionnaire survey","authors":"Yinger Gu, Zheng Yao, Keyi Shi, Lei Huang, Pingchun Yang, Qiaoping Zhao, Ting Lu, Yaping Meng, Ji Jin, Xiaoteng Chen, Nv Xia, Yingchun Zhang, Fangfang Wang, Lijuan Ma, Yangqing Zheng, Haifeng Huang, Cheng Wang, Lingling Lou, Longlong Fan, Jue Zhou, Fan Qu","doi":"10.1016/j.jgr.2026.101027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>As market interest and consumer demand for ginseng increase, there remains a limited understanding of ginseng among individuals with health needs. This study investigated these perceptions and their influencing factors through a nationwide survey in China.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multicenter, cross-sectional questionnaire survey was carried out from September 26 to October 10, 2025, across 15 medical institutions in China, involving a total of 5041 patients.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Individuals with health needs showed different ginseng perceptions based on their health status. Those without chronic diseases demonstrated higher awareness of traditional ginseng benefits such as boosting immunity (89.05%) and combating fatigue (76.22%), greater familiarity with American ginseng (77.18%), and primarily relied on family/friends (70.22%) for information. Individuals with chronic conditions demonstrated a diminished awareness of traditional benefits but a heightened recognition of mood and mental state improvement (61.84%), and an increased familiarity with ginseng cultivated in Korea (71.41%) and mountain-cultivated ginseng (73.45%). Their information sources were predominantly from physicians, pharmacists, and nutritionists (63.26%). Medical professionals demonstrated limited awareness of niche varieties like mountain-cultivated ginseng (23.94%) and specific disease-management benefits like blood sugar regulation (26.02%). Regarding safety perception, 69.56% held neutral or unaware views on potential side effects, and 20.99% incorrectly believed ginseng was suitable for everyone.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There exists heterogeneity in the understanding of ginseng across various groups, and the public health education should employ targeted strategies for people with different health statuses to encourage rational use of ginseng.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ginseng Research","volume":"50 4","pages":"Article 101027"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13324102/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ginseng Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1226845326000539","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
As market interest and consumer demand for ginseng increase, there remains a limited understanding of ginseng among individuals with health needs. This study investigated these perceptions and their influencing factors through a nationwide survey in China.
Methods
A multicenter, cross-sectional questionnaire survey was carried out from September 26 to October 10, 2025, across 15 medical institutions in China, involving a total of 5041 patients.
Results
Individuals with health needs showed different ginseng perceptions based on their health status. Those without chronic diseases demonstrated higher awareness of traditional ginseng benefits such as boosting immunity (89.05%) and combating fatigue (76.22%), greater familiarity with American ginseng (77.18%), and primarily relied on family/friends (70.22%) for information. Individuals with chronic conditions demonstrated a diminished awareness of traditional benefits but a heightened recognition of mood and mental state improvement (61.84%), and an increased familiarity with ginseng cultivated in Korea (71.41%) and mountain-cultivated ginseng (73.45%). Their information sources were predominantly from physicians, pharmacists, and nutritionists (63.26%). Medical professionals demonstrated limited awareness of niche varieties like mountain-cultivated ginseng (23.94%) and specific disease-management benefits like blood sugar regulation (26.02%). Regarding safety perception, 69.56% held neutral or unaware views on potential side effects, and 20.99% incorrectly believed ginseng was suitable for everyone.
Conclusion
There exists heterogeneity in the understanding of ginseng across various groups, and the public health education should employ targeted strategies for people with different health statuses to encourage rational use of ginseng.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Ginseng Research (JGR) is an official, open access journal of the Korean Society of Ginseng and is the only international journal publishing scholarly reports on ginseng research in the world. The journal is a bimonthly peer-reviewed publication featuring high-quality studies related to basic, pre-clinical, and clinical researches on ginseng to reflect recent progresses in ginseng research.
JGR publishes papers, either experimental or theoretical, that advance our understanding of ginseng science, including plant sciences, biology, chemistry, pharmacology, toxicology, pharmacokinetics, veterinary medicine, biochemistry, manufacture, and clinical study of ginseng since 1976. It also includes the new paradigm of integrative research, covering alternative medicinal approaches. Article types considered for publication include review articles, original research articles, and brief reports.
JGR helps researchers to understand mechanisms for traditional efficacy of ginseng and to put their clinical evidence together. It provides balanced information on basic science and clinical applications to researchers, manufacturers, practitioners, teachers, scholars, and medical doctors.